Re: [討論] 想問版上所謂的糞作在日本的評價?已回收
※ 引述《evolution907 (Davis)》之銘言:
: 如題 前陣子有人列了一堆糞作
: 像是罪惡王冠 A/Z 艦隊收藏...甚至是還沒演完的夏洛特之類
: 突然覺得好奇 不曉得這些在日本的評價是如何?
: 搞不好他們不管劇情 覺得畫風美、人設棒、長的可愛就是好作?
: 我有些朋友就覺得有一些還不錯 畫風美設定棒
: 像是罪惡王冠 雖然我也覺得不錯 撇開劇情啦
: 我自己是很在意結局啦 結局我不能接受的對我來說通通都叫糞作
: 還有賣肉也算 不過這其實算性質!?
: 有沒有人知道這些作品在日本人的眼裡是如何?
日本的我不清楚 來分享歐美這邊的
以下評分來自MYANIMELIST
ANGEL BEATS 8.48
罪惡王冠 7.89
ALDNOAH ZERO 第一季 7.79
第二季 7.25
艦隊收藏 7.11
CHARLOTTE 8.01
GLASSLIP 5.58
魔法戰爭 6.19
看起來只有玻璃唇和魔法戰爭是中外公認的ㄈㄣ ˋ作
其他好像都沒想像中慘嘛(?) ANGEL BEATS的評分甚至是100多名哩
所以到底為啥AB在這裡負評會這麼多哩(歪頭)
好了 火種我丟下去了 接下來我要脫離戰場了(逃)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 116.4.64.123
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1443019449.A.CB3.html
※ 編輯: blaze520 (116.4.64.123), 09/23/2015 22:44:42
→
09/23 22:44, , 1F
09/23 22:44, 1F
→
09/23 22:46, , 2F
09/23 22:46, 2F
推
09/23 22:46, , 3F
09/23 22:46, 3F
→
09/23 22:47, , 4F
09/23 22:47, 4F
→
09/23 22:47, , 5F
09/23 22:47, 5F
→
09/23 22:47, , 6F
09/23 22:47, 6F
→
09/23 22:48, , 7F
09/23 22:48, 7F
推
09/23 22:49, , 8F
09/23 22:49, 8F
→
09/23 22:49, , 9F
09/23 22:49, 9F
→
09/23 22:49, , 10F
09/23 22:49, 10F
→
09/23 22:49, , 11F
09/23 22:49, 11F
→
09/23 22:49, , 12F
09/23 22:49, 12F
→
09/23 22:49, , 13F
09/23 22:49, 13F
→
09/23 22:50, , 14F
09/23 22:50, 14F
推
09/23 22:50, , 15F
09/23 22:50, 15F
推
09/23 22:51, , 16F
09/23 22:51, 16F
→
09/23 22:52, , 17F
09/23 22:52, 17F
→
09/23 22:52, , 18F
09/23 22:52, 18F
推
09/23 22:53, , 19F
09/23 22:53, 19F
→
09/23 22:54, , 20F
09/23 22:54, 20F
推
09/23 22:54, , 21F
09/23 22:54, 21F
推
09/23 22:55, , 22F
09/23 22:55, 22F
→
09/23 22:55, , 23F
09/23 22:55, 23F
→
09/23 22:56, , 24F
09/23 22:56, 24F
推
09/23 22:56, , 25F
09/23 22:56, 25F
推
09/23 22:57, , 26F
09/23 22:57, 26F
推
09/23 22:58, , 27F
09/23 22:58, 27F
推
09/23 23:02, , 28F
09/23 23:02, 28F
→
09/23 23:03, , 29F
09/23 23:03, 29F
→
09/23 23:03, , 30F
09/23 23:03, 30F
推
09/23 23:03, , 31F
09/23 23:03, 31F
→
09/23 23:05, , 32F
09/23 23:05, 32F
推
09/23 23:05, , 33F
09/23 23:05, 33F
推
09/23 23:06, , 34F
09/23 23:06, 34F
→
09/23 23:06, , 35F
09/23 23:06, 35F
→
09/23 23:06, , 36F
09/23 23:06, 36F
→
09/23 23:07, , 37F
09/23 23:07, 37F
→
09/23 23:07, , 38F
09/23 23:07, 38F
推
09/23 23:08, , 39F
09/23 23:08, 39F
→
09/23 23:08, , 40F
09/23 23:08, 40F
→
09/23 23:09, , 41F
09/23 23:09, 41F
→
09/23 23:09, , 42F
09/23 23:09, 42F
→
09/23 23:09, , 43F
09/23 23:09, 43F
→
09/23 23:10, , 44F
09/23 23:10, 44F
推
09/23 23:11, , 45F
09/23 23:11, 45F
→
09/23 23:13, , 46F
09/23 23:13, 46F
推
09/23 23:16, , 47F
09/23 23:16, 47F
→
09/23 23:16, , 48F
09/23 23:16, 48F
→
09/23 23:16, , 49F
09/23 23:16, 49F
推
09/23 23:17, , 50F
09/23 23:17, 50F
→
09/23 23:32, , 51F
09/23 23:32, 51F
推
09/23 23:38, , 52F
09/23 23:38, 52F
→
09/23 23:38, , 53F
09/23 23:38, 53F
推
09/23 23:45, , 54F
09/23 23:45, 54F
推
09/23 23:55, , 55F
09/23 23:55, 55F
→
09/23 23:55, , 56F
09/23 23:55, 56F
推
09/24 00:16, , 57F
09/24 00:16, 57F
推
09/24 01:22, , 58F
09/24 01:22, 58F
推
09/24 09:35, , 59F
09/24 09:35, 59F
→
09/24 09:36, , 60F
09/24 09:36, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):