Re: [15春] 食戟之靈 05消失
應s38...(後略)大的要求
來解釋一下erina是必取的理由好了
還是先防雷一下
先說本人非原作黨
只有看動畫跟部份貼文
所以erina往後萬一有什麼扶老太太過馬路或捐錢給紫衣妙禪
或是對相撲有什麼創傷後心理壓力症候群(PTSD)
這些高尚行為或洗百原因恕不在本人認知範圍
=======================
首先
s38...(下略)大說了
遠月規則就是雙方提出等價賭注比賽輸了不得怨言
阿是哪個智障會把一生家當賭一個遙不可及的可能性
你會跟愛因斯坦比賽算物理賭上自己的房子
就算贏了可以當上帝我也不幹
所以合理推論,這比試是被erina逼的
或者學長除了這樣沒有別的選擇
後來有板友也證實這個想法
(漫畫雷)erina先用十傑議會砍他社團預算
逼他接受食戟
如果這不叫必取,什麼才叫做必取?
你當然可以說遠月規則就是強者壓迫弱者
99%是1%的墊腳石
那希特勒也可以說根據納粹德國的規則
猶太人是雅利安人的墊腳石啊
再舉一個例子
玩大逃殺的學生
消滅同學是符合規則,也是為了活下去
但這不會改變他們殺人的事實
正因很多人屈服於規則
反抗規則的三村信史他們才更顯得高尚不是嗎
更何況erina可以選擇
他可以選擇容忍那些社團
就算相撲火鍋社存在她還是高高在上的神之舌
當她百年難得一見的天才
但她沒有
她像踩死螞蟻一樣毀了這些社團
為了自己的料理樓
毀了無數學生的唯一的依靠
得證:erina是必取
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.46.236
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1430577062.A.0DB.html
→
05/02 22:33, , 1F
05/02 22:33, 1F
推
05/02 22:34, , 2F
05/02 22:34, 2F
推
05/02 22:34, , 3F
05/02 22:34, 3F
→
05/02 22:34, , 4F
05/02 22:34, 4F
→
05/02 22:35, , 5F
05/02 22:35, 5F
推
05/02 22:35, , 6F
05/02 22:35, 6F
→
05/02 22:35, , 7F
05/02 22:35, 7F
→
05/02 22:35, , 8F
05/02 22:35, 8F
推
05/02 22:35, , 9F
05/02 22:35, 9F
推
05/02 22:36, , 10F
05/02 22:36, 10F
→
05/02 22:36, , 11F
05/02 22:36, 11F
→
05/02 22:36, , 12F
05/02 22:36, 12F
推
05/02 22:36, , 13F
05/02 22:36, 13F
→
05/02 22:37, , 14F
05/02 22:37, 14F
→
05/02 22:37, , 15F
05/02 22:37, 15F
→
05/02 22:37, , 16F
05/02 22:37, 16F
→
05/02 22:37, , 17F
05/02 22:37, 17F
→
05/02 22:38, , 18F
05/02 22:38, 18F
推
05/02 22:38, , 19F
05/02 22:38, 19F
推
05/02 22:38, , 20F
05/02 22:38, 20F
推
05/02 22:39, , 21F
05/02 22:39, 21F
→
05/02 22:39, , 22F
05/02 22:39, 22F
→
05/02 22:39, , 23F
05/02 22:39, 23F
→
05/02 22:39, , 24F
05/02 22:39, 24F
推
05/02 22:40, , 25F
05/02 22:40, 25F
推
05/02 22:41, , 26F
05/02 22:41, 26F
→
05/02 22:41, , 27F
05/02 22:41, 27F
推
05/02 22:41, , 28F
05/02 22:41, 28F
推
05/02 22:42, , 29F
05/02 22:42, 29F
→
05/02 22:42, , 30F
05/02 22:42, 30F
→
05/02 22:42, , 31F
05/02 22:42, 31F
推
05/02 22:42, , 32F
05/02 22:42, 32F
推
05/02 22:43, , 33F
05/02 22:43, 33F
推
05/02 22:43, , 34F
05/02 22:43, 34F
→
05/02 22:43, , 35F
05/02 22:43, 35F
→
05/02 22:43, , 36F
05/02 22:43, 36F
→
05/02 22:43, , 37F
05/02 22:43, 37F
→
05/02 22:43, , 38F
05/02 22:43, 38F
→
05/02 22:43, , 39F
05/02 22:43, 39F
→
05/02 22:43, , 40F
05/02 22:43, 40F
推
05/02 22:44, , 41F
05/02 22:44, 41F
→
05/02 22:44, , 42F
05/02 22:44, 42F
→
05/02 22:44, , 43F
05/02 22:44, 43F
推
05/02 22:44, , 44F
05/02 22:44, 44F
→
05/02 22:44, , 45F
05/02 22:44, 45F
→
05/02 22:45, , 46F
05/02 22:45, 46F
→
05/02 22:46, , 47F
05/02 22:46, 47F
推
05/02 22:48, , 48F
05/02 22:48, 48F
推
05/02 22:48, , 49F
05/02 22:48, 49F
→
05/02 22:48, , 50F
05/02 22:48, 50F
推
05/02 22:49, , 51F
05/02 22:49, 51F
推
05/02 22:49, , 52F
05/02 22:49, 52F
→
05/02 22:49, , 53F
05/02 22:49, 53F
→
05/02 22:49, , 54F
05/02 22:49, 54F
→
05/02 22:51, , 55F
05/02 22:51, 55F
→
05/02 22:55, , 56F
05/02 22:55, 56F
推
05/02 22:56, , 57F
05/02 22:56, 57F
推
05/02 23:02, , 58F
05/02 23:02, 58F
→
05/02 23:03, , 59F
05/02 23:03, 59F
→
05/02 23:09, , 60F
05/02 23:09, 60F
→
05/02 23:16, , 61F
05/02 23:16, 61F
→
05/02 23:17, , 62F
05/02 23:17, 62F
→
05/02 23:17, , 63F
05/02 23:17, 63F
→
05/02 23:18, , 64F
05/02 23:18, 64F
→
05/02 23:24, , 65F
05/02 23:24, 65F
→
05/02 23:24, , 66F
05/02 23:24, 66F
→
05/02 23:24, , 67F
05/02 23:24, 67F
→
05/02 23:24, , 68F
05/02 23:24, 68F
推
05/02 23:32, , 69F
05/02 23:32, 69F
推
05/02 23:45, , 70F
05/02 23:45, 70F
→
05/02 23:46, , 71F
05/02 23:46, 71F
推
05/03 00:38, , 72F
05/03 00:38, 72F
推
05/03 03:39, , 73F
05/03 03:39, 73F
→
05/03 14:01, , 74F
05/03 14:01, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 21 篇):