Re: [問題] max violating pair

看板CS_SLT2005作者 (@_@"""")時間20年前 (2005/11/09 11:57), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串3/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《Evenroll (研二不是應該很清閒嗎?)》之銘言: : I have a question about max violating pair. : since : I_up = {t| alpha_t < C, y_t = 1 or alpha_t > 0, y_t = -1 } : and : I_low = {t| alpha_t < C, y_t = -1 or alpha_t > 0, y_t = 1 } : then : at begining, alpha is set to zero as a initial value : then all i don't belong to I_up or I_low, since no alpha_i > 0. : should I just randomly pick up 2 index i & j ? Hey! If alpha_i = 0 and y_i = 1, then it is in I_up (alpha_i = 0 < C). : if I just randomly choose i & j at the first iteration, : I still encounter this problem at the second iteration, : since only alph_i and alpha_j are changed, : all other i are still zero and they don't belong to I_up or I_low... : so... : I think that in the definition of I_up and I_low, : maybe we should rewrite the inequality to be alpha_t >= 0 or alpha_t <= C : is that right? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.90.75

11/09 12:33, , 1F
I see, thank you:)
11/09 12:33, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #13SNEgGo (CS_SLT2005)
文章代碼(AID): #13SNEgGo (CS_SLT2005)