Re: [外電] Yep, Wang is definitely NOT an ace

看板CMWang作者YGJHSU (杰)時間16年前 (2008/04/08 14:49)推噓14(14推 0噓 1→)

留言15則, 14人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

這篇還蠻有趣的簡單翻一下 ※ 引述《wesun (統一獅王重返榮耀^^)》之銘言： : 其實這位作者還有一篇 : 不過感覺他很喜歡我們的 : 小王就是了^^ : 大家可以幫我縮嗎 = =" : http://www.bugsandcranks.com/new-york-yankees/yep-wang-is-definitely-not-an-ace/ : Yeah, that Chien-Ming Wang is DEFINITELY not an ace. Nope. Definitely not a : No. 1 guy who can match up with the game’s best starters and come out on top : more often than not. 對，王建民保證不是一個ACE,絕對不是那個可以跟CY等級強投捉對廝殺，並且多半能夠取得勝利的強力投手 : Nope. No way. Hell, even catcher Jorge Posada said during the off-season that : the Yankees should have made the Johan Santana trade because : “we need a No. 1.” 不，絕對不是。就連隊上的捕手Posada都在季後表示，希望能交易到Santana, 因為洋基需要一個ACE : Nope. Despite a major-league leading 38 wins in 2006 and 2007 and only 13 : losses, he can’t get any respect. Not even from his own teammates. 即使連續兩年拿下19勝，總共只吞下13敗，王建民依然無法獲得大家尊敬，甚至是他的隊友。 (編按：我覺得這邊有點偏頗，Posada表示希望獲得Santana也不代表他甚至隊上其他人不尊重王，這點可以從其他外電看出) : I beg to differ. He isn’t a flashy strikeout pitcher or a talkative, : attention-grabbing personality. He is just a groundball machine who gets deep : in games and consistently and wins more often than just about every other : starter in the game. 我請大家換個角度思考。他不是一個狂丟三振的投手，賽後也很少大放厥詞引人矚目。但，他就像一台滾地球機器，每場穩定地投到比賽的後段，最後贏得比聯盟大部分投手更多的勝利。 : An ace? I think so. Go ahead and name 10 starters in the major leagues who are : CLEARLY better than Wang right now. And if you really want to go to the : trouble, back up your argument with the numbers to prove it. 這樣的表現叫做王牌嗎？就我來看是的。不然請你提出大聯盟裡明顯比他更好的10個先發投手啊，如果你發現有點難找，那麼你就必須提出其他證據證明"王不是一個王牌" : I doubt you’ll be able to do that, conclusively. So, how do you make the : argument that a guy who is undoubtedly one of the game’s 10 best starters is : NOT an ace? I don’t think you can. 我猜你很難找到證據。所以，為什麼你會認為一個幾乎毫無疑問聯盟前10名的先發投手不是王牌呢？我真的很難以理解。 : Wang (2-0) won again Sunday, throwing 6.1 shutout innings in a 2-0 victory : over Tampa Bay. By the way, his opponent Sunday was James Shields — the best : starter the Rays have. 王在禮拜一對光芒投出精彩好球，6.1局沒有掉分，他的對手也不是省油的燈，是目前坦帕灣最好的先發投手Shields (編按：Scott Kozmir目前受傷) : Oh, and his other victory this season? A 3-2 win over Toronto ace Roy : Halladay, one of the game’s best pitchers, in which he pitched 7 excellent : innings. 那他本季第一場勝利呢？是從前CY獎得主Halladay手中所拿下，那場他投了7局好球 : He can’t win big playoff games, the Wang bashers say. And yes, Wang was : awful in the playoffs last season posting a 19.06 ERA in two brutal starts. : Yes, he is 0-3 with a 7.58 ERA in three playoff starts. 也有不看好王建民的人說，他不會在季後賽贏球。對! 他上一個球季的爛我們有目共睹面對印地安人兩場都爆炸了防禦率19.06 生涯季後賽防禦率也高達7.58 : Wang was awful in last season’s playoffs. But, look a little closer at his : 2005 and 2006 performances. As a rookie in 2005, he pitched 6.2 innngs in a : loss to Anaheim, allowing just one run. In 2006, against Detroit, he again : pitched 6.2 innings, this time allowing three runs. So, one of those outings : was dominant, the other pretty good. 上個球季很糟糕，不代表05跟06年的表現很差。事實上，05年王以新人姿態在季後賽投出一場好球，可惜最後敗給天使。06年，對老虎也投的不差。 : He was bad last season, but don’t tell me he can’t pitch in the playoffs. : He has shown that he can. 所以不要根據上一季的表現告訴我王建民不能投季後賽。他已經證明他可以。 : So, go right ahead and keep thinking Wang isn’t an ace. Some Yankee fans — : and even players like Posada — might agree. I don’t care, and I don’t : think Wang does either. 所以...繼續認為王建民不是王牌吧，就像有些球迷跟球員想的那樣，我不在乎，我也不認為王建民會放在心上。 : He is just going to keep pounding hitters with that sinker and, most : importantly, winning games. Isn’t that what an ace does? 他只要繼續用沈重伸卡球蹂躪打者，然後，最重要的是，拿下比賽勝利。這不就是一個王牌該做的事嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.243.242

推

millertw

04/08 14:55, , 1^F

04/08 14:55, 1^F

※ 編輯: YGJHSU 來自: 140.112.243.242 (04/08 14:58) ※ 編輯: YGJHSU 來自: 140.112.243.242 (04/08 15:00)

推

wjc

04/08 15:00, , 2^F

04/08 15:00, 2^F

推

soaringfish

04/08 15:01, , 3^F