Re: [閒聊] 修仙修真小說? 根本是修魔才對吧
我是覺得所謂的修仙如書裡說的一族......
托瑪斯:有300%利潤資本敢冒殺頭的危險而如果搶到那些資源,就能踏出更多的一步,
那會不搶的是聖人,不是多數人;看看吵了好幾年的釣魚台、一發現北極圈有石油
一堆國家都衝出來說北極圈是他們的;傳說有歐洲人偷偷摸來金瓜石偷挖金礦....
過去的修仙小說,就好像早期的武俠小說,書裡的大俠不缺錢、急公好義;
但和真實的修仙的差異,是不是應該像水滸傳和歷史上的宋匪的差異?
是殺人土匪,死了的小老百姓也是滿坑滿谷?
所以韓非子已經明確說出:儒以文亂法,俠以武犯禁。
再來殺你全家的中二思想,我們會覺得把殺你全家掛在嘴上是個中二,
是因為辦不到,但如果人家有這個能耐呢?這還算是中二嗎?比如當你住在巴西,
你敢去挑釁裡面的四大毒梟?搶他們要得東西?我是不敢,因為他們有作過
很多殺人全家的事,也有這個能耐;也許你會說那些毒梟是黑道作不得準,
但你想想是不是有很多人階努力運用手頭能用的資源到極限?當兵時有官能罩
爽到退伍、記者收好康把餿水說成美食、樁腳找市長來罵警察、某仁兄裝病
保外就醫不回去蹲,如果當你有掌握他人的生死能力時,能溫良恭儉讓的人
有幾個?
最後,修仙的個別差異太大,要建立所謂的秩序感覺上很難,像是環保美國
很多環保人士到處要別國環保拉,別濫捕拉,但是一說到各國要建立排放CO2
標準,美國馬上說謝謝再連絡......想想美國和其他國家的實力對比,還沒
有修仙裡的元嬰和金丹對比差異大;那要建立起所謂的秩序法律,誰來建立?
如果當你一個人就能自給自足且各項條件遠遠優於其他人,能無條件接受限制
又能夠有幾個人呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.13.27
※ 編輯: fansue 來自: 114.45.13.27 (03/10 16:55)
→
03/10 17:05, , 1F
03/10 17:05, 1F
推
03/10 17:32, , 2F
03/10 17:32, 2F
→
03/10 17:33, , 3F
03/10 17:33, 3F
→
03/10 17:34, , 4F
03/10 17:34, 4F
推
03/10 17:36, , 5F
03/10 17:36, 5F
→
03/10 17:37, , 6F
03/10 17:37, 6F
推
03/10 17:41, , 7F
03/10 17:41, 7F
→
03/10 17:42, , 8F
03/10 17:42, 8F
推
03/10 17:45, , 9F
03/10 17:45, 9F
→
03/10 17:46, , 10F
03/10 17:46, 10F
→
03/10 17:47, , 11F
03/10 17:47, 11F
→
03/10 17:47, , 12F
03/10 17:47, 12F
→
03/10 17:49, , 13F
03/10 17:49, 13F
→
03/10 17:50, , 14F
03/10 17:50, 14F
→
03/10 17:51, , 15F
03/10 17:51, 15F
推
03/10 17:54, , 16F
03/10 17:54, 16F
→
03/10 17:56, , 17F
03/10 17:56, 17F
→
03/10 18:00, , 18F
03/10 18:00, 18F
→
03/10 18:01, , 19F
03/10 18:01, 19F
推
03/10 18:02, , 20F
03/10 18:02, 20F
→
03/10 18:03, , 21F
03/10 18:03, 21F
→
03/10 18:03, , 22F
03/10 18:03, 22F
→
03/10 18:03, , 23F
03/10 18:03, 23F
→
03/10 18:03, , 24F
03/10 18:03, 24F
→
03/10 18:05, , 25F
03/10 18:05, 25F
→
03/10 18:05, , 26F
03/10 18:05, 26F
推
03/10 18:07, , 27F
03/10 18:07, 27F
→
03/10 18:10, , 28F
03/10 18:10, 28F
推
03/10 18:11, , 29F
03/10 18:11, 29F
→
03/10 18:11, , 30F
03/10 18:11, 30F
→
03/10 18:11, , 31F
03/10 18:11, 31F
→
03/10 18:13, , 32F
03/10 18:13, 32F
→
03/10 18:18, , 33F
03/10 18:18, 33F
→
03/10 18:19, , 34F
03/10 18:19, 34F
→
03/10 18:19, , 35F
03/10 18:19, 35F
→
03/10 18:20, , 36F
03/10 18:20, 36F
推
03/10 22:44, , 37F
03/10 22:44, 37F
推
03/11 00:01, , 38F
03/11 00:01, 38F
→
03/11 00:01, , 39F
03/11 00:01, 39F
→
03/11 00:02, , 40F
03/11 00:02, 40F
→
03/11 00:03, , 41F
03/11 00:03, 41F
→
03/11 00:03, , 42F
03/11 00:03, 42F
→
03/11 00:58, , 43F
03/11 00:58, 43F
→
03/11 00:59, , 44F
03/11 00:59, 44F
→
03/11 00:59, , 45F
03/11 00:59, 45F
推
03/11 09:47, , 46F
03/11 09:47, 46F
→
03/11 10:16, , 47F
03/11 10:16, 47F
→
03/11 11:01, , 48F
03/11 11:01, 48F
推
03/11 19:26, , 49F
03/11 19:26, 49F
→
03/11 19:26, , 50F
03/11 19:26, 50F
推
03/11 20:13, , 51F
03/11 20:13, 51F
→
03/11 20:17, , 52F
03/11 20:17, 52F
→
03/11 20:17, , 53F
03/11 20:17, 53F
→
03/11 21:00, , 54F
03/11 21:00, 54F
→
03/11 22:47, , 55F
03/11 22:47, 55F
→
03/11 22:48, , 56F
03/11 22:48, 56F
→
03/11 22:48, , 57F
03/11 22:48, 57F
推
03/15 15:34, , 58F
03/15 15:34, 58F
→
08/12 16:34, , 59F
08/12 16:34, 59F
→
09/14 10:57, , 60F
09/14 10:57, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 16 篇):