[板務] 是否將水桶名單予以大赦!!
各位先進同志 您好!!
因過去種種之歷史因素,
使本板有著許外廣為人知的過往歷史,
(詳情請見ptthistory板)
不能否認的是大多數板友都認同水桶名單中有許多名單
是否應給予水桶仍有存疑,
是否於此光榮的時刻,將水桶中之名單
給予大赦之處份,望各位先進給予指教。
祝日安,tjtjtjkimo敬上
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.38.9.56
→
09/14 02:19, , 1F
09/14 02:19, 1F
→
09/14 02:19, , 2F
09/14 02:19, 2F
→
09/14 02:20, , 3F
09/14 02:20, 3F
→
09/14 02:20, , 4F
09/14 02:20, 4F
→
09/14 02:22, , 5F
09/14 02:22, 5F
→
09/14 02:23, , 6F
09/14 02:23, 6F
推
09/14 02:23, , 7F
09/14 02:23, 7F
→
09/14 02:24, , 8F
09/14 02:24, 8F
→
09/14 02:24, , 9F
09/14 02:24, 9F
→
09/14 02:24, , 10F
09/14 02:24, 10F
嗯非常同意SS327 而且本建議為K少的競選主張
就如同民選新板主此時開始,對於之前的舊有陋習,不於此時打破更待何時,
且於某任板主時期強烈鮮明的管理風格,對於不同意見有不同的處理方式
對於為數不少的水桶名單,是否能夠還原處份時之原貌,
管見認為仍有存疑,故大赦應可為此一解套選項!!
※ 編輯: tjtjtjkimo 來自: 114.38.9.56 (09/14 02:31)
→
09/14 02:25, , 11F
09/14 02:25, 11F
推
09/14 02:27, , 12F
09/14 02:27, 12F
→
09/14 02:27, , 13F
09/14 02:27, 13F
→
09/14 02:27, , 14F
09/14 02:27, 14F
→
09/14 02:27, , 15F
09/14 02:27, 15F
→
09/14 02:28, , 16F
09/14 02:28, 16F
→
09/14 02:28, , 17F
09/14 02:28, 17F
→
09/14 02:28, , 18F
09/14 02:28, 18F
→
09/14 02:28, , 19F
09/14 02:28, 19F
→
09/14 02:29, , 20F
09/14 02:29, 20F
→
09/14 02:29, , 21F
09/14 02:29, 21F
→
09/14 02:29, , 22F
09/14 02:29, 22F
→
09/14 02:29, , 23F
09/14 02:29, 23F
→
09/14 02:31, , 24F
09/14 02:31, 24F
→
09/14 02:31, , 25F
09/14 02:31, 25F
→
09/14 02:31, , 26F
09/14 02:31, 26F
→
09/14 02:32, , 27F
09/14 02:32, 27F
→
09/14 02:32, , 28F
09/14 02:32, 28F
前任小組長所言甚事,但R板主之前於小組板中,已多次被使用者投訴,
因關於板主水桶溝通事件,拒不回覆,並於設定黑名單對於寄件者,
相信前小組長應有目共睹!!
※ 編輯: tjtjtjkimo 來自: 114.38.9.56 (09/14 02:36)
→
09/14 02:33, , 29F
09/14 02:33, 29F
→
09/14 02:35, , 30F
09/14 02:35, 30F
→
09/14 02:36, , 31F
09/14 02:36, 31F
→
09/14 02:36, , 32F
09/14 02:36, 32F
→
09/14 02:37, , 33F
09/14 02:37, 33F
→
09/14 02:37, , 34F
09/14 02:37, 34F
→
09/14 02:37, , 35F
09/14 02:37, 35F
→
09/14 02:38, , 36F
09/14 02:38, 36F
→
09/14 02:38, , 37F
09/14 02:38, 37F
→
09/14 02:38, , 38F
09/14 02:38, 38F
→
09/14 02:39, , 39F
09/14 02:39, 39F
→
09/14 02:39, , 40F
09/14 02:39, 40F
→
09/14 02:39, , 41F
09/14 02:39, 41F
所以 我可以解釋前小組長所言,對於r板主設黑名單之事,前小組長認為
r板主無違規,但屬不當行為?
※ 編輯: tjtjtjkimo 來自: 114.38.9.56 (09/14 02:42)
→
09/14 02:41, , 42F
09/14 02:41, 42F
→
09/14 02:41, , 43F
09/14 02:41, 43F
→
09/14 02:42, , 44F
09/14 02:42, 44F
→
09/14 02:42, , 45F
09/14 02:42, 45F
→
09/14 02:44, , 46F
09/14 02:44, 46F
→
09/14 02:45, , 47F
09/14 02:45, 47F
→
09/14 02:45, , 48F
09/14 02:45, 48F
前小組長於此,提供許多寶貴之見,實屬可貴,符合民主社會中,
自由及普世之價值,對於上述之言論,本人對於是否支持,持保留
態度,相信能給予新任板主許多能平衡思考之空間。
→
09/14 02:50, , 49F
09/14 02:50, 49F
※ 編輯: tjtjtjkimo 來自: 114.38.9.56 (09/14 02:53)
→
09/14 02:50, , 50F
09/14 02:50, 50F
→
09/14 02:56, , 51F
09/14 02:56, 51F
→
09/14 02:57, , 52F
09/14 02:57, 52F
→
09/14 02:57, , 53F
09/14 02:57, 53F
→
09/14 02:57, , 54F
09/14 02:57, 54F
→
09/14 03:14, , 55F
09/14 03:14, 55F
→
09/14 03:14, , 56F
09/14 03:14, 56F
→
09/14 03:17, , 57F
09/14 03:17, 57F
→
09/14 05:14, , 58F
09/14 05:14, 58F
→
09/14 09:58, , 59F
09/14 09:58, 59F
推
09/14 23:35, , 60F
09/14 23:35, 60F
推
09/16 03:13, , 61F
09/16 03:13, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)