Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache suEXEC privilege elevation / inform
--kOt9WlffnlwJsBMPEfiJG6EwBJVbmMiRg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Am 11.08.2013 14:50, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> On 2013-08-11 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 10.08.2013 16:52, schrieb Tobias Kreidl:
>>> It is for this specific reason that utilities like suPHP can be used
>>> as a powerful tool to at least keep the account user from shooting
>>> anyone but him/herself in the foot because of any configuration or
>>> broken security issues. Allowing suexec to anyone but a seasoned,
>>> responsible admin is IMO a recipe for disaster.
>>
>> and what makes you believe that a developer can not be a "seasoned,
>> responsible admin"?
>=20
> Most developers I have met would focus on getting new features to work
> rather than secure/reliable operation of the deployed software
maybe you met the wrong ones............
on the other hand most admins i met did not use "disallow_functions"
a responsilble developer which is at the same time admin has the
knowledge not using dangerous functions and disables them
one config line and the whole topic would be obsolete by not
allowing symlinks from web-applications
disable_functions =3D "popen, pclose, exec, passthru, shell_exec, system=
, proc_open, proc_close, proc_nice,
proc_terminate, proc_get_status, pcntl_exec, apache_child_terminate, posi=
x_kill, posix_mkfifo, posix_setpgid,
posix_setsid, posix_setuid, mail, symlink, link, dl, get_current_user, ge=
tmypid, getmyuid, getrusage, pfsockopen,
socket_accept, socket_bind, openlog, syslog"
>> bullshit, many of the "seasoned, responsible admins" which are only
>> admins are unable to really understand the implications of whatever
>> config they rollout
>=20
> Apparently you still haven't learned your lesson from being banned from=
> the postfix-users mailing list
oh i forgot, in the enlish speaking world in have to write
"clould i ask you please could consider to think about...."
--kOt9WlffnlwJsBMPEfiJG6EwBJVbmMiRg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIHsCEACgkQhmBjz394AnkLbwCeIVkj1777vyVFhVVZZoJGVjTe
gagAoJTH8tWDWKMOOV40l+fpWDodzZuR
=FZCN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kOt9WlffnlwJsBMPEfiJG6EwBJVbmMiRg--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 32 篇)：