Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache suEXEC privilege elevation / inform

看板Bugtraq作者時間12年前 (2013/08/11 19:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/32 (看更多)
--HLVoWwxKalPAdH5guQhp9glQPJtVpdRSw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 10.08.2013 16:52, schrieb Tobias Kreidl: > It is for this specific reason that utilities like suPHP can be used as= a powerful tool to at least keep the > account user from shooting anyone but him/herself in the foot because o= f any configuration or broken security > issues. Allowing suexec to anyone but a seasoned, responsible admin is = IMO a recipe for disaster. and what makes you believe that a developer can not be a "seasoned, respo= nsible admin"? bullshit, many of the "seasoned, responsible admins" which are only admin= s are unable to really understand the implications of whatever config they rollout > On 8/10/2013 7:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 10.08.2013 12:10, schrieb Gichuki John Chuksjonia: >>> One thing u gotta remember most of the Admins who handle webservers i= n >>> a network are also developers since most of the organizations will >>> always need to cut on expenses, and as we know, most of the developer= s >>> will just look into finishing work and making it work. So if somethin= g >>> doesn't run due to httpd.conf, you will find these guys loosening >>> server security, therefore opening holes to the infrastructure. >> i am one of the developers who are admin >> >> why? >> >> because maintaining servers where only internal developed >> software gives you the power to make security as tighten >> as possible - and yes security is *always* first >> >> not the admins which are developers are the problem >> >> crap like wordpress, joomla, phpBB is the problem because >> these developers have no idea how to secure maintain a >> server and try to develop software which can be installed >> by any random fool on whatever webserver without understand >> the implications >> >> thats's why these applications are *strictly* forbidden >> on any machine i am responsible for, it's enough to write >> abuse mails each time one of these installations outside >> got hacked and is starting attacks on 3rd parties >> >=20 >=20 --=20 Reindl Harald the lounge interactive design GmbH A-1060 Vienna, Hofm=FChlgasse 17 CTO / CISO / Software-Development m: +43 (676) 40 221 40, p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33 icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/ http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm --HLVoWwxKalPAdH5guQhp9glQPJtVpdRSw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIHaxIACgkQhmBjz394AnmyjwCggSrTtaFdjwJxr6RqQN79Fnf1 21AAn33ewYphq9mENaA4/rquminEg0Wt =0kuG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HLVoWwxKalPAdH5guQhp9glQPJtVpdRSw--
文章代碼(AID): #1I1tOoiK (Bugtraq)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 32 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1I1tOoiK (Bugtraq)