Re: STP mitm attack idea

看板Bugtraq作者時間15年前 (2010/04/29 05:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/8 (看更多)
--=-wKLt1+diNnM9o2nARCiy Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Dienstag, den 27.04.2010, 19:55 +0200 schrieb Przemyslaw Borkowski: > Second scenario: > 1. Station C and station D starts to send frames to break link beetween s= witch 1 and switch 2, and announce non existing connection and switch from = C port on switch 1 to D port on switch 2 >=20 > A ---- switch 1 --X-- switch 2 ----- B > | | > | | > C --no conn-- D > 2. Station A sends frame to B > 3. Frame is forwarded to C station > 4. Station C stores frame in memory > 5. After equal timing station C and station D repair link beetween switch= 1 and 2 > 6. station C resends stored packet to station D (ie in tunnel or encapsul= ated in ip packet) > 7. stations C and D break link beetween switches 1 and 2 > 8. station D sends transmitted packet to station B If you had a WLAN-link, you could simplify that a lot - as far as I understand, you are able to make the switches redirect the traffic to your machines. Anyway, this attack sounds like something a good switch can easily prevent by having a list of "STP trusted ports" or something like that. Doesn't that exist? --=-wKLt1+diNnM9o2nARCiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvYYF8ACgkQzjXtStZOSRfEmwCfSNZoByXWv3z3v3N5ABPXigwJ Fh4An0oEguzRYGr7zyEj3CowPbRabJQp =hIFi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wKLt1+diNnM9o2nARCiy--
文章代碼(AID): #1BsA8EVG (Bugtraq)
文章代碼(AID): #1BsA8EVG (Bugtraq)