RE: Re[2]: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your netw
For some commentary on this issue, this is one man's thoughts.
http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0602.html#16
Tom
Hawk Corporation
ttevans@hawkcorp.net
440-528-4045 Direct
440-498-2276 x 4045
Cell: 440-669-2526
Fax: 917-464-7241
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Reed [mailto:avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au]=20
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:49 AM
To: Thierry@Zoller.lu
Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your
network?
In some mail from Thierry Zoller, sie said:
>=20
> CDSC> real back doors are better
> I like that tautologie, "real backdoors", what makes a backdoor more
> real than another one ? Is it the coolness, the stealth ? Or is it
> simply the fact that it gives back door access ?
How about putting a backdoor into your C compiler such that it
generates "special code" when it recognises it is compiling
/bin/login that allows special access?
That doesn't show up in any code audit of /bin/login...
so you think about auditting the code that makes up the compiler..
where does the executable for that come from...
and so on back.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇)：