[討論] 是錯覺嗎?男性的價值?(純討論、非引戰)
作者: pk289 (289NN) 站內: Boy-Girl
標題: [討論] 是錯覺嗎?男性的價值?(純討論、非引戰)
時間: Sun Mar 16 01:38:24 2014
公司有很多年過35的女同事
打扮的很漂亮、卻數年無追求者了
FB上時常透露出單身的無奈
似乎只要有一個經濟能力尚可的另一半,就願意托付一生
感覺上女性只要一過30、35這些門檻
想結婚想有小孩的就會快速且大幅度的降低另一半的門檻
只要另一半稍有收入,而且身體上沒有重大殘缺
即使年薪不到百萬、沒房沒車的
都既往不咎,管他以前多宅多悶只要是單身不花心就好
是錯覺嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.126.15.186
※ 編輯: pk289 來自: 59.126.15.186 (03/16 01:39)
推
03/16 01:42, , 1F
03/16 01:42, 1F
→
03/16 01:43, , 2F
03/16 01:43, 2F
推
03/16 01:43, , 3F
03/16 01:43, 3F
推
03/16 01:44, , 4F
03/16 01:44, 4F
算是吧!如果一年存不到50萬,在台灣要怎樣繁衍後代?
※ 編輯: pk289 來自: 59.126.15.186 (03/16 01:49)
推
03/16 01:48, , 5F
03/16 01:48, 5F
→
03/16 01:49, , 6F
03/16 01:49, 6F
推
03/16 01:50, , 7F
03/16 01:50, 7F
不一樣阿..是龍的女性大概30之後就沒人要了
但是宅男即使很龍,30之後還是有機會可以靠著日後的努力打拼而有家室
※ 編輯: pk289 來自: 59.126.15.186 (03/16 01:54)
推
03/16 01:52, , 8F
03/16 01:52, 8F
→
03/16 01:56, , 9F
03/16 01:56, 9F
推
03/16 01:56, , 10F
03/16 01:56, 10F
→
03/16 02:02, , 11F
03/16 02:02, 11F
推
03/16 02:03, , 12F
03/16 02:03, 12F
推
03/16 02:05, , 13F
03/16 02:05, 13F
推
03/16 02:08, , 14F
03/16 02:08, 14F
→
03/16 02:09, , 15F
03/16 02:09, 15F
→
03/16 02:12, , 16F
03/16 02:12, 16F
推
03/16 02:13, , 17F
03/16 02:13, 17F
→
03/16 02:14, , 18F
03/16 02:14, 18F
→
03/16 02:15, , 19F
03/16 02:15, 19F
→
03/16 02:16, , 20F
03/16 02:16, 20F
推
03/16 02:18, , 21F
03/16 02:18, 21F
→
03/16 02:19, , 22F
03/16 02:19, 22F
→
03/16 02:20, , 23F
03/16 02:20, 23F
推
03/16 02:21, , 24F
03/16 02:21, 24F
推
03/16 02:22, , 25F
03/16 02:22, 25F
推
03/16 02:27, , 26F
03/16 02:27, 26F
推
03/16 02:51, , 27F
03/16 02:51, 27F
→
03/16 03:04, , 28F
03/16 03:04, 28F
→
03/16 03:13, , 29F
03/16 03:13, 29F
→
03/16 03:14, , 30F
03/16 03:14, 30F
→
03/16 03:17, , 31F
03/16 03:17, 31F
→
03/16 03:18, , 32F
03/16 03:18, 32F
推
03/16 03:58, , 33F
03/16 03:58, 33F
→
03/16 04:04, , 34F
03/16 04:04, 34F
推
03/16 07:05, , 35F
03/16 07:05, 35F
推
03/16 07:06, , 36F
03/16 07:06, 36F
→
03/16 07:07, , 37F
03/16 07:07, 37F
推
03/16 07:10, , 38F
03/16 07:10, 38F
→
03/16 07:39, , 39F
03/16 07:39, 39F
→
03/16 07:40, , 40F
03/16 07:40, 40F
→
03/16 09:29, , 41F
03/16 09:29, 41F
推
03/16 09:58, , 42F
03/16 09:58, 42F
→
03/16 09:58, , 43F
03/16 09:58, 43F
推
03/16 10:01, , 44F
03/16 10:01, 44F
→
03/16 10:06, , 45F
03/16 10:06, 45F
→
03/16 10:06, , 46F
03/16 10:06, 46F
→
03/16 10:11, , 47F
03/16 10:11, 47F
→
03/16 10:12, , 48F
03/16 10:12, 48F
→
03/16 10:13, , 49F
03/16 10:13, 49F
推
03/16 10:15, , 50F
03/16 10:15, 50F
→
03/16 10:16, , 51F
03/16 10:16, 51F
→
03/16 10:38, , 52F
03/16 10:38, 52F
→
03/16 10:47, , 53F
03/16 10:47, 53F
推
03/16 11:11, , 54F
03/16 11:11, 54F
推
03/16 11:38, , 55F
03/16 11:38, 55F
→
03/16 12:33, , 56F
03/16 12:33, 56F
→
03/16 12:34, , 57F
03/16 12:34, 57F
噓
03/16 12:54, , 58F
03/16 12:54, 58F
推
03/16 13:04, , 59F
03/16 13:04, 59F
推
03/16 13:22, , 60F
03/16 13:22, 60F
→
03/16 13:23, , 61F
03/16 13:23, 61F
推
03/16 14:27, , 62F
03/16 14:27, 62F
→
03/16 14:27, , 63F
03/16 14:27, 63F
→
03/16 14:27, , 64F
03/16 14:27, 64F
→
03/16 16:06, , 65F
03/16 16:06, 65F
推
03/16 16:07, , 66F
03/16 16:07, 66F
噓
03/16 16:37, , 67F
03/16 16:37, 67F
噓
03/16 16:42, , 68F
03/16 16:42, 68F
噓
03/16 17:15, , 69F
03/16 17:15, 69F
→
03/16 19:53, , 70F
03/16 19:53, 70F
噓
03/16 20:49, , 71F
03/16 20:49, 71F
噓
03/16 21:14, , 72F
03/16 21:14, 72F
→
03/16 21:51, , 73F
03/16 21:51, 73F
→
03/16 21:51, , 74F
03/16 21:51, 74F
推
03/16 23:54, , 75F
03/16 23:54, 75F
推
03/17 00:56, , 76F
03/17 00:56, 76F
噓
03/17 01:04, , 77F
03/17 01:04, 77F
噓
03/17 23:17, , 78F
03/17 23:17, 78F
噓
03/17 23:21, , 79F
03/17 23:21, 79F
→
03/17 23:21, , 80F
03/17 23:21, 80F
→
03/18 00:12, , 81F
03/18 00:12, 81F
推
03/18 04:58, , 82F
03/18 04:58, 82F
噓
03/18 10:58, , 83F
03/18 10:58, 83F
噓
03/18 13:15, , 84F
03/18 13:15, 84F
推
03/30 18:32, , 85F
03/30 18:32, 85F
→
03/30 18:34, , 86F
03/30 18:34, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):