[新聞] 噗浪遭中國微軟抄襲 (微軟最新回應)

看板Blog作者 (一念之差,哭哭)時間14年前 (2009/12/16 10:46), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板] 作者: Alexboo (身如柳絮隨波擺) 看板: Gossiping 標題: Re: [新聞] 噗浪遭中國微軟抄襲 創辦人:沒錢找律師 時間: Wed Dec 16 10:40:32 2009 微軟最新回應 http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2009/dec09/12-15statement.mspx Microsoft Statement Regarding MSN China Joint Venture’s Juku Feature REDMOND, Wash. – Dec. 15, 2009 – On Monday, December 14, questions arose over a beta application called Juku developed by a Chinese vendor for our MSN China joint venture. We immediately worked with our MSN China joint venture to investigate the situation. The vendor has now acknowledged that a portion of the code they provided was indeed copied. This was in clear violation of the vendor’s contract with the MSN China joint venture, and equally inconsistent with Microsoft’ s policies respecting intellectual property. When we hire an outside company to do development work, our practice is to include strong language in our contract that clearly states the company must provide work that does not infringe the intellectual property rights of others. We are a company that respects intellectual property and it was never our intent to have a site that was not respectful of the work that others in the industry have done. We will be suspending access to the Juku beta indefinitely. We are obviously very disappointed, but we assume responsibility for this situation. We apologize to Plurk and we will be reaching out to them directly to explain what happened and the steps we have taken to resolve the situation. In the wake of this incident, Microsoft and our MSN China joint venture will be taking a look at our practices around applications code provided by third-party vendors. ======== 微軟: 被你抓到囉 協力廠商承認是抄的 那後續再研究看看 一件落著 可喜可賀 可喜可賀 PS: 昨天看老外的blog有提到這件事 不過老外們似乎認為Plurk要提出實質損害來要求賠償有難度 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.235.71

12/16 10:42,
沒人理這篇XD 天朝使者比較偉大
12/16 10:42

12/16 10:42,
搞不好最後反而是微軟向包商索賠之後 分一部分給噗浪
12/16 10:42

12/16 10:42,
到最後說不定微軟還有賺到從包商那邊來的賠償金
12/16 10:42

12/16 10:43,
有實質損害嗎?反正plurk在中國大陸是被鎖的
12/16 10:43

12/16 10:43,
微軟:簡單 把你吃下來就好
12/16 10:43

12/16 10:43,
就是欺負你沒錢沒勢啦 當初應該拉給google才能存活
12/16 10:43

12/16 10:44,
微軟會在意這點小錢嗎 直接把Plurk買下來就好了
12/16 10:44

12/16 10:44,
如果沒有在中國或比較大的市場申請智慧財產權 法律上
12/16 10:44

12/16 10:44,
應該很難把他定罪吧 不過為了名聲 微軟應該會選擇河蟹
12/16 10:44

12/16 10:45,
話說大陸Google的輸入法也抄過搜狗的.....
12/16 10:45
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.166.119.25
文章代碼(AID): #1BA4eK-P (Blog)