Re: [討論] 潘萣翔算是中職前三大失敗選秀嗎
從過去幾次的旅外選手海歸,
大概統計一下就可以知道,
1.3A以上站穩,甚至站上大聯盟的,大概成為球星的機會不小,
理事長跟釣蝦都有聯盟平均以上的實力。
2.2A~3A之間的,也有實力成為領頭羊,陳鏞基、秀砲跟蔣砲就是最佳例證。
以上都可以用第一到第二順位選,失敗率不高。
3.2A以下的,除了超級喜歡算是吱吱自己養出來的,以及神奇的桃園王外,
普遍表現都沒有很亮眼。
這部分就不值得用前三順位去選了,中段選秀順位是比較好的選擇。
所以今年在日本PJ、羅國華等人,大概都是中段以後的順位投資報酬率會比較好。
當然,這些都不考慮簽約金的問題。
※ 引述《eric55 (overcome!!)》之銘言:
: 剛剛那傳球失誤 找國中生來都可以穩穩抓出局數
: 還差點搞砸了小飛刀的救援
: 再來回顧當年選秀
: http://i.imgur.com/71YJD06.jpg

: 後面還有中華隊未來游擊霸阿飛 還有冠軍賽打垮我象的黃亦志
: 如果不要選潘 我象是不是就不會三連亞了呢
: 當初是不是高估潘萣翔了?
--
Sent from my 黑金剛
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.163.30.244
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1494465624.A.AE0.html
推
05/11 09:28, , 1F
05/11 09:28, 1F
推
05/11 09:29, , 2F
05/11 09:29, 2F
→
05/11 09:29, , 3F
05/11 09:29, 3F
推
05/11 09:31, , 4F
05/11 09:31, 4F
推
05/11 09:35, , 5F
05/11 09:35, 5F
推
05/11 09:35, , 6F
05/11 09:35, 6F
推
05/11 09:37, , 7F
05/11 09:37, 7F
推
05/11 09:37, , 8F
05/11 09:37, 8F
→
05/11 09:38, , 9F
05/11 09:38, 9F
推
05/11 09:39, , 10F
05/11 09:39, 10F
→
05/11 09:39, , 11F
05/11 09:39, 11F
→
05/11 09:39, , 12F
05/11 09:39, 12F
推
05/11 09:41, , 13F
05/11 09:41, 13F
推
05/11 09:45, , 14F
05/11 09:45, 14F
推
05/11 09:45, , 15F
05/11 09:45, 15F
噓
05/11 09:46, , 16F
05/11 09:46, 16F
→
05/11 09:47, , 17F
05/11 09:47, 17F
推
05/11 09:47, , 18F
05/11 09:47, 18F
推
05/11 09:48, , 19F
05/11 09:48, 19F
→
05/11 09:49, , 20F
05/11 09:49, 20F
→
05/11 09:50, , 21F
05/11 09:50, 21F
推
05/11 09:50, , 22F
05/11 09:50, 22F
→
05/11 09:50, , 23F
05/11 09:50, 23F
推
05/11 09:50, , 24F
05/11 09:50, 24F
→
05/11 09:51, , 25F
05/11 09:51, 25F
→
05/11 09:51, , 26F
05/11 09:51, 26F
→
05/11 09:52, , 27F
05/11 09:52, 27F
→
05/11 09:52, , 28F
05/11 09:52, 28F
噓
05/11 09:52, , 29F
05/11 09:52, 29F
→
05/11 09:53, , 30F
05/11 09:53, 30F
推
05/11 09:53, , 31F
05/11 09:53, 31F
→
05/11 09:53, , 32F
05/11 09:53, 32F
→
05/11 09:56, , 33F
05/11 09:56, 33F
→
05/11 09:56, , 34F
05/11 09:56, 34F
→
05/11 09:57, , 35F
05/11 09:57, 35F
推
05/11 09:57, , 36F
05/11 09:57, 36F
→
05/11 09:57, , 37F
05/11 09:57, 37F
→
05/11 09:58, , 38F
05/11 09:58, 38F
推
05/11 09:58, , 39F
05/11 09:58, 39F
→
05/11 09:59, , 40F
05/11 09:59, 40F
→
05/11 10:00, , 41F
05/11 10:00, 41F
推
05/11 10:01, , 42F
05/11 10:01, 42F
推
05/11 10:01, , 43F
05/11 10:01, 43F
→
05/11 10:05, , 44F
05/11 10:05, 44F
→
05/11 10:09, , 45F
05/11 10:09, 45F
推
05/11 10:11, , 46F
05/11 10:11, 46F
推
05/11 10:20, , 47F
05/11 10:20, 47F
推
05/11 10:21, , 48F
05/11 10:21, 48F
→
05/11 10:21, , 49F
05/11 10:21, 49F
推
05/11 10:23, , 50F
05/11 10:23, 50F
推
05/11 10:54, , 51F
05/11 10:54, 51F
→
05/11 10:54, , 52F
05/11 10:54, 52F
→
05/11 10:56, , 53F
05/11 10:56, 53F
推
05/11 10:57, , 54F
05/11 10:57, 54F
推
05/11 11:07, , 55F
05/11 11:07, 55F
推
05/11 11:24, , 56F
05/11 11:24, 56F
→
05/11 11:24, , 57F
05/11 11:24, 57F
推
05/11 11:37, , 58F
05/11 11:37, 58F
→
05/11 11:38, , 59F
05/11 11:38, 59F
推
05/11 11:43, , 60F
05/11 11:43, 60F
→
05/11 12:20, , 61F
05/11 12:20, 61F
→
05/11 12:21, , 62F
05/11 12:21, 62F
推
05/11 12:27, , 63F
05/11 12:27, 63F
→
05/11 12:32, , 64F
05/11 12:32, 64F
推
05/11 18:25, , 65F
05/11 18:25, 65F
推
05/11 18:25, , 66F
05/11 18:25, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)