[閒聊] 總覺得國外二游在處理滾地雙殺就是比較帥已回收
國外指的是沒有靠小孩子墊高名次,世界排名前幾名的國家
一樣是內野手基本功的二游雙殺
感覺國外的選手處理起來就是比較漂亮
如果是游擊手接到球,有時候還沒站穩就出手了 (也不會偏掉)
如果是二壘手接到球,有時候不是用拋球的,是用那種像是發射手裡劍的姿勢用推的
要不然就是重心放低,然後用短傳的
另外另一名進壘的野手跑位也很順暢,整個就是舒服
另外這次台日對抗賽G1,日本的二游各處理一顆滾地球,
這種守備感覺台灣的野手做不出來
有人跟我一樣這麼覺得嗎?
台式雙殺和外國雙殺感覺就是不同的視覺感受
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.0.238.13
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1490153475.A.AA2.html
推
03/22 11:32, , 1F
03/22 11:32, 1F
推
03/22 11:32, , 2F
03/22 11:32, 2F
推
03/22 11:33, , 3F
03/22 11:33, 3F
推
03/22 11:34, , 4F
03/22 11:34, 4F
推
03/22 11:34, , 5F
03/22 11:34, 5F
推
03/22 11:34, , 6F
03/22 11:34, 6F
推
03/22 11:34, , 7F
03/22 11:34, 7F
推
03/22 11:34, , 8F
03/22 11:34, 8F
→
03/22 11:34, , 9F
03/22 11:34, 9F
推
03/22 11:35, , 10F
03/22 11:35, 10F
推
03/22 11:35, , 11F
03/22 11:35, 11F
推
03/22 11:35, , 12F
03/22 11:35, 12F
推
03/22 11:35, , 13F
03/22 11:35, 13F
推
03/22 11:36, , 14F
03/22 11:36, 14F
→
03/22 11:36, , 15F
03/22 11:36, 15F
推
03/22 11:36, , 16F
03/22 11:36, 16F
推
03/22 11:36, , 17F
03/22 11:36, 17F
推
03/22 11:36, , 18F
03/22 11:36, 18F
→
03/22 11:36, , 19F
03/22 11:36, 19F
推
03/22 11:36, , 20F
03/22 11:36, 20F
→
03/22 11:36, , 21F
03/22 11:36, 21F
推
03/22 11:37, , 22F
03/22 11:37, 22F
→
03/22 11:37, , 23F
03/22 11:37, 23F
球評也有提過
如果二游離對方還有一小段距離,仍然選擇用低手拋球,一壘那個會抓不到
※ 編輯: wegoWU (123.0.238.13), 03/22/2017 11:38:56
推
03/22 11:38, , 24F
03/22 11:38, 24F
推
03/22 11:38, , 25F
03/22 11:38, 25F
推
03/22 11:38, , 26F
03/22 11:38, 26F
推
03/22 11:39, , 27F
03/22 11:39, 27F
→
03/22 11:39, , 28F
03/22 11:39, 28F
推
03/22 11:39, , 29F
03/22 11:39, 29F
→
03/22 11:39, , 30F
03/22 11:39, 30F
推
03/22 11:39, , 31F
03/22 11:39, 31F
→
03/22 11:40, , 32F
03/22 11:40, 32F
推
03/22 11:40, , 33F
03/22 11:40, 33F
→
03/22 11:40, , 34F
03/22 11:40, 34F
→
03/22 11:40, , 35F
03/22 11:40, 35F
→
03/22 11:41, , 36F
03/22 11:41, 36F
推
03/22 11:41, , 37F
03/22 11:41, 37F
→
03/22 11:42, , 38F
03/22 11:42, 38F
推
03/22 11:42, , 39F
03/22 11:42, 39F
推
03/22 11:51, , 40F
03/22 11:51, 40F
→
03/22 11:51, , 41F
03/22 11:51, 41F
推
03/22 11:51, , 42F
03/22 11:51, 42F
→
03/22 11:51, , 43F
03/22 11:51, 43F
→
03/22 11:58, , 44F
03/22 11:58, 44F
推
03/22 12:11, , 45F
03/22 12:11, 45F
噓
03/22 12:12, , 46F
03/22 12:12, 46F
推
03/22 12:15, , 47F
03/22 12:15, 47F
推
03/22 12:16, , 48F
03/22 12:16, 48F
→
03/22 12:18, , 49F
03/22 12:18, 49F
→
03/22 12:24, , 50F
03/22 12:24, 50F
推
03/22 12:29, , 51F
03/22 12:29, 51F
推
03/22 12:36, , 52F
03/22 12:36, 52F
推
03/22 12:41, , 53F
03/22 12:41, 53F
→
03/22 12:49, , 54F
03/22 12:49, 54F
推
03/22 12:54, , 55F
03/22 12:54, 55F
推
03/22 12:57, , 56F
03/22 12:57, 56F
推
03/22 12:58, , 57F
03/22 12:58, 57F
推
03/22 13:00, , 58F
03/22 13:00, 58F
推
03/22 13:06, , 59F
03/22 13:06, 59F
→
03/22 13:06, , 60F
03/22 13:06, 60F
→
03/22 13:08, , 61F
03/22 13:08, 61F
→
03/22 13:09, , 62F
03/22 13:09, 62F
推
03/22 13:38, , 63F
03/22 13:38, 63F
推
03/22 13:53, , 64F
03/22 13:53, 64F
噓
03/22 14:23, , 65F
03/22 14:23, 65F
→
03/22 14:23, , 66F
03/22 14:23, 66F
→
03/22 15:05, , 67F
03/22 15:05, 67F
→
03/22 15:06, , 68F
03/22 15:06, 68F
噓
03/22 18:49, , 69F
03/22 18:49, 69F
噓
03/22 19:00, , 70F
03/22 19:00, 70F
推
03/23 13:04, , 71F
03/23 13:04, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):