Re: [閒聊] 棒協很爛,但為什麼要給中職主導?已回收
完全不怪
目前看起來
大咖旅外球員越來越難徵召
既然一級賽事主要球員、球場
都是來自於中職
由中職來主導到底有什麼不妥?
難道一定要捨本逐末
找個獨立單位來承辦嗎?完全無法理解找棒協來主辦哪裡理想
今天你養車 養場地
結果比賽的時候
一個陌生人跑來說你車和場地要免費借我拿去用
而且門票我收
車子不能給我低階的 要最好的
用壞就還你 不能吭聲
這樣到底哪裡好?
球團自己養車養場地
我不信他們會比棒協疏於照顧球員
畢竟一級球星就是最貴的資產
甚至是球隊命脈
對棒協來說
用完用壞根本沒有損失
反正過幾年要比賽
你球團再養個好球員給我用就對了
不給?我就找媒體攻擊你不愛國
※ 引述《justin1943 (prototype)》之銘言:
: 現在大家應該都很同意棒協很爛直接解散算了
: 但就算沒有了棒協,為什麼是中職來主導國際賽?
: 為什麼是由 “單一聯盟” 來主導,而不是另外一個獨立的單位呢? (理想來說棒協就
是
: 這單位,但實在太腐敗)
: 因為最高國際賽事不是全部都中職球員組成阿!旅外球員雖然相對少數,但還是佔有一
定
: 的重要性,如果真的由中職主導,不會衍生其他問題?
: (聲明一下我完全支持棒協解散 但由中職主導也怪)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.237.135.52
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489297848.A.075.html
→
03/12 13:52, , 1F
03/12 13:52, 1F
但是由球團認養
一年要花幾千萬維護
推
03/12 13:52, , 2F
03/12 13:52, 2F
※ 編輯: fantazy00077 (36.237.135.52), 03/12/2017 13:53:31
→
03/12 13:56, , 3F
03/12 13:56, 3F
推
03/12 13:57, , 4F
03/12 13:57, 4F
推
03/12 14:01, , 5F
03/12 14:01, 5F
→
03/12 14:02, , 6F
03/12 14:02, 6F
→
03/12 14:02, , 7F
03/12 14:02, 7F
→
03/12 14:03, , 8F
03/12 14:03, 8F
→
03/12 14:03, , 9F
03/12 14:03, 9F
→
03/12 14:03, , 10F
03/12 14:03, 10F
推
03/12 14:04, , 11F
03/12 14:04, 11F
→
03/12 14:04, , 12F
03/12 14:04, 12F
→
03/12 14:05, , 13F
03/12 14:05, 13F
推
03/12 14:05, , 14F
03/12 14:05, 14F
→
03/12 14:06, , 15F
03/12 14:06, 15F
推
03/12 14:06, , 16F
03/12 14:06, 16F
推
03/12 14:06, , 17F
03/12 14:06, 17F
→
03/12 14:07, , 18F
03/12 14:07, 18F
推
03/12 14:07, , 19F
03/12 14:07, 19F
→
03/12 14:08, , 20F
03/12 14:08, 20F
→
03/12 14:08, , 21F
03/12 14:08, 21F
推
03/12 14:08, , 22F
03/12 14:08, 22F
→
03/12 14:08, , 23F
03/12 14:08, 23F
→
03/12 14:08, , 24F
03/12 14:08, 24F
→
03/12 14:09, , 25F
03/12 14:09, 25F
→
03/12 14:10, , 26F
03/12 14:10, 26F
推
03/12 14:10, , 27F
03/12 14:10, 27F
→
03/12 14:11, , 28F
03/12 14:11, 28F
棒協做對了一件事
就是他叫中華民國棒球協會
※ 編輯: fantazy00077 (36.237.135.52), 03/12/2017 14:13:47
推
03/12 14:16, , 29F
03/12 14:16, 29F
推
03/12 14:17, , 30F
03/12 14:17, 30F
→
03/12 14:17, , 31F
03/12 14:17, 31F
推
03/12 14:18, , 32F
03/12 14:18, 32F
→
03/12 14:19, , 33F
03/12 14:19, 33F
→
03/12 14:19, , 34F
03/12 14:19, 34F
→
03/12 14:19, , 35F
03/12 14:19, 35F
→
03/12 14:19, , 36F
03/12 14:19, 36F
→
03/12 14:20, , 37F
03/12 14:20, 37F
→
03/12 14:20, , 38F
03/12 14:20, 38F
推
03/12 14:27, , 39F
03/12 14:27, 39F
→
03/12 14:27, , 40F
03/12 14:27, 40F
推
03/12 14:29, , 41F
03/12 14:29, 41F
推
03/12 14:31, , 42F
03/12 14:31, 42F
→
03/12 14:38, , 43F
03/12 14:38, 43F
→
03/12 14:38, , 44F
03/12 14:38, 44F
推
03/12 14:40, , 45F
03/12 14:40, 45F
推
03/12 14:42, , 46F
03/12 14:42, 46F
噓
03/12 14:52, , 47F
03/12 14:52, 47F
噓
03/12 14:59, , 48F
03/12 14:59, 48F
→
03/12 15:02, , 49F
03/12 15:02, 49F
→
03/12 15:03, , 50F
03/12 15:03, 50F
推
03/12 15:04, , 51F
03/12 15:04, 51F
→
03/12 15:05, , 52F
03/12 15:05, 52F
→
03/12 15:05, , 53F
03/12 15:05, 53F
→
03/12 15:05, , 54F
03/12 15:05, 54F
→
03/12 15:06, , 55F
03/12 15:06, 55F
→
03/12 15:06, , 56F
03/12 15:06, 56F
→
03/12 15:07, , 57F
03/12 15:07, 57F
→
03/12 15:07, , 58F
03/12 15:07, 58F
→
03/12 15:08, , 59F
03/12 15:08, 59F
→
03/12 15:08, , 60F
03/12 15:08, 60F
→
03/12 15:08, , 61F
03/12 15:08, 61F
→
03/12 15:09, , 62F
03/12 15:09, 62F
→
03/12 15:09, , 63F
03/12 15:09, 63F
→
03/12 15:09, , 64F
03/12 15:09, 64F
→
03/12 15:10, , 65F
03/12 15:10, 65F
→
03/12 15:11, , 66F
03/12 15:11, 66F
推
03/12 15:14, , 67F
03/12 15:14, 67F
→
03/12 15:14, , 68F
03/12 15:14, 68F
→
03/12 15:15, , 69F
03/12 15:15, 69F
推
03/12 15:15, , 70F
03/12 15:15, 70F
→
03/12 15:15, , 71F
03/12 15:15, 71F
推
03/12 15:42, , 72F
03/12 15:42, 72F
推
03/12 15:45, , 73F
03/12 15:45, 73F
推
03/12 16:10, , 74F
03/12 16:10, 74F
推
03/12 16:25, , 75F
03/12 16:25, 75F
→
03/12 16:25, , 76F
03/12 16:25, 76F
→
03/12 16:27, , 77F
03/12 16:27, 77F
推
03/12 16:56, , 78F
03/12 16:56, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):