[討論] 台灣選手打擊跟守備真的不能兼具嗎已回收
wbc台灣選手整體打擊還算不錯
這我想大家還認同
但整體守備零零落落
有形無形失誤一堆
我想大家應該更認同
這幾年你要說球彈也好,道歉球也好
打擊水平拉高不少
扣掉投手這環外
也掩蓋了很多野手守備上的缺失
這次帶上的國手
感覺普遍都很極端
不是能打不太能守,就是能守不太能打
又不是美式足球
還分什麼進攻組守備組的
在個人淺薄的印象中
打擊跟守備都有水平以上的
只有東哥黃忠義
守備好的多半被稱為自殺棒
長槍以上的守備很多都抖抖
要兼具打擊跟守備
對職業選手來說,真的是很困難的嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.220.191.67
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489136558.A.498.html
推
03/10 17:03, , 1F
03/10 17:03, 1F
推
03/10 17:04, , 2F
03/10 17:04, 2F
推
03/10 17:04, , 3F
03/10 17:04, 3F
推
03/10 17:05, , 4F
03/10 17:05, 4F
→
03/10 17:05, , 5F
03/10 17:05, 5F
→
03/10 17:05, , 6F
03/10 17:05, 6F
推
03/10 17:05, , 7F
03/10 17:05, 7F
推
03/10 17:05, , 8F
03/10 17:05, 8F
推
03/10 17:05, , 9F
03/10 17:05, 9F
推
03/10 17:05, , 10F
03/10 17:05, 10F
推
03/10 17:05, , 11F
03/10 17:05, 11F
→
03/10 17:06, , 12F
03/10 17:06, 12F
推
03/10 17:06, , 13F
03/10 17:06, 13F
→
03/10 17:06, , 14F
03/10 17:06, 14F
→
03/10 17:06, , 15F
03/10 17:06, 15F

推
03/10 17:06, , 16F
03/10 17:06, 16F
推
03/10 17:06, , 17F
03/10 17:06, 17F
→
03/10 17:06, , 18F
03/10 17:06, 18F
→
03/10 17:06, , 19F
03/10 17:06, 19F

推
03/10 17:06, , 20F
03/10 17:06, 20F
推
03/10 17:07, , 21F
03/10 17:07, 21F
→
03/10 17:07, , 22F
03/10 17:07, 22F
→
03/10 17:07, , 23F
03/10 17:07, 23F
推
03/10 17:07, , 24F
03/10 17:07, 24F
推
03/10 17:07, , 25F
03/10 17:07, 25F
推
03/10 17:08, , 26F
03/10 17:08, 26F
→
03/10 17:08, , 27F
03/10 17:08, 27F
推
03/10 17:08, , 28F
03/10 17:08, 28F
推
03/10 17:09, , 29F
03/10 17:09, 29F
→
03/10 17:09, , 30F
03/10 17:09, 30F
→
03/10 17:09, , 31F
03/10 17:09, 31F
推
03/10 17:09, , 32F
03/10 17:09, 32F
推
03/10 17:09, , 33F
03/10 17:09, 33F
→
03/10 17:10, , 34F
03/10 17:10, 34F
→
03/10 17:10, , 35F
03/10 17:10, 35F
→
03/10 17:10, , 36F
03/10 17:10, 36F
推
03/10 17:11, , 37F
03/10 17:11, 37F
推
03/10 17:11, , 38F
03/10 17:11, 38F
→
03/10 17:11, , 39F
03/10 17:11, 39F
推
03/10 17:11, , 40F
03/10 17:11, 40F
→
03/10 17:11, , 41F
03/10 17:11, 41F
→
03/10 17:12, , 42F
03/10 17:12, 42F
→
03/10 17:12, , 43F
03/10 17:12, 43F
→
03/10 17:12, , 44F
03/10 17:12, 44F
→
03/10 17:12, , 45F
03/10 17:12, 45F
推
03/10 17:13, , 46F
03/10 17:13, 46F
→
03/10 17:13, , 47F
03/10 17:13, 47F
→
03/10 17:13, , 48F
03/10 17:13, 48F
推
03/10 17:13, , 49F
03/10 17:13, 49F
→
03/10 17:14, , 50F
03/10 17:14, 50F
→
03/10 17:14, , 51F
03/10 17:14, 51F
→
03/10 17:14, , 52F
03/10 17:14, 52F
→
03/10 17:15, , 53F
03/10 17:15, 53F
推
03/10 17:16, , 54F
03/10 17:16, 54F
→
03/10 17:16, , 55F
03/10 17:16, 55F
→
03/10 17:19, , 56F
03/10 17:19, 56F
推
03/10 17:19, , 57F
03/10 17:19, 57F
→
03/10 17:20, , 58F
03/10 17:20, 58F
→
03/10 17:20, , 59F
03/10 17:20, 59F
→
03/10 17:21, , 60F
03/10 17:21, 60F
→
03/10 17:21, , 61F
03/10 17:21, 61F
推
03/10 17:24, , 62F
03/10 17:24, 62F
→
03/10 17:24, , 63F
03/10 17:24, 63F
→
03/10 17:27, , 64F
03/10 17:27, 64F
推
03/10 17:33, , 65F
03/10 17:33, 65F
→
03/10 17:33, , 66F
03/10 17:33, 66F
→
03/10 17:33, , 67F
03/10 17:33, 67F
推
03/10 17:42, , 68F
03/10 17:42, 68F
推
03/10 17:51, , 69F
03/10 17:51, 69F
→
03/10 17:55, , 70F
03/10 17:55, 70F
推
03/10 18:00, , 71F
03/10 18:00, 71F
推
03/10 18:03, , 72F
03/10 18:03, 72F
推
03/10 18:05, , 73F
03/10 18:05, 73F
→
03/10 18:05, , 74F
03/10 18:05, 74F
推
03/10 18:13, , 75F
03/10 18:13, 75F
推
03/10 18:33, , 76F
03/10 18:33, 76F
推
03/10 18:43, , 77F
03/10 18:43, 77F
→
03/10 18:45, , 78F
03/10 18:45, 78F
→
03/10 18:45, , 79F
03/10 18:45, 79F
推
03/10 18:48, , 80F
03/10 18:48, 80F
→
03/10 18:48, , 81F
03/10 18:48, 81F
推
03/10 19:14, , 82F
03/10 19:14, 82F
→
03/10 19:14, , 83F
03/10 19:14, 83F
推
03/10 19:34, , 84F
03/10 19:34, 84F
推
03/11 00:19, , 85F
03/11 00:19, 85F