[閒聊] 這次WBC能證明中職的彈力球也能練出好投手嗎?已回收
如題
看到這幾場這些中職投手上去後援
小飛刀跟倪砸鍋就不討論了
畢竟他們在中職季賽本來就很常BS
但其他無論像正選國家隊的林晨樺、王鏡銘、嘟嘟或黃勝雄
還是去陪日本武士隊陪練的 鄉長跟賴SEAFOOD
基本上都展現了超乎想像的壓制力
特別是今天看到林晨樺
說真的在中職季賽我對他的印象就是
只要打線中多幾個左打 那大概就準備要被尻爆了
所以今天對韓上去緊急替換時
我也想說大概要大量失分了
結果竟然還是穩穩吃了幾位左打安全下庄
其他也不多說了 中職這幾位投手ERA大都在4以上
卻都沒丟掉甚麼分數 根本屌虐日職的兩位小將
所以我猜測
應該是彈力球逼得投手進步
畢竟想想 這些投手過去在季賽中早已習慣被一局爆
所以這次對上這些日韓強打或許會想說 "反正不就跟平常一樣 大不了被打爆"
然後平時因為也習慣了隨時會被尻爆 心臟也特別大顆勇於對決
反而收到了不錯的效果?
這麼看來彈力球聯盟好像也不錯?
畢竟從結果來看本次中職打線好像也沒預期如海水退潮了一樣
打下的分數在A組也只少了根本是MLB打線的以色列1分
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.250.164.154
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489074806.A.239.html
推
03/09 23:54, , 1F
03/09 23:54, 1F
→
03/09 23:55, , 2F
03/09 23:55, 2F
→
03/09 23:55, , 3F
03/09 23:55, 3F
推
03/09 23:55, , 4F
03/09 23:55, 4F
推
03/09 23:55, , 5F
03/09 23:55, 5F
→
03/09 23:56, , 6F
03/09 23:56, 6F
推
03/09 23:56, , 7F
03/09 23:56, 7F
推
03/09 23:56, , 8F
03/09 23:56, 8F
推
03/09 23:57, , 9F
03/09 23:57, 9F
→
03/09 23:57, , 10F
03/09 23:57, 10F
→
03/09 23:57, , 11F
03/09 23:57, 11F
推
03/09 23:57, , 12F
03/09 23:57, 12F
推
03/09 23:57, , 13F
03/09 23:57, 13F
噓
03/09 23:57, , 14F
03/09 23:57, 14F
→
03/09 23:57, , 15F
03/09 23:57, 15F
→
03/09 23:57, , 16F
03/09 23:57, 16F
推
03/09 23:58, , 17F
03/09 23:58, 17F
→
03/09 23:58, , 18F
03/09 23:58, 18F
→
03/09 23:58, , 19F
03/09 23:58, 19F
→
03/09 23:59, , 20F
03/09 23:59, 20F
推
03/09 23:59, , 21F
03/09 23:59, 21F
→
03/09 23:59, , 22F
03/09 23:59, 22F
→
03/09 23:59, , 23F
03/09 23:59, 23F
→
03/10 00:00, , 24F
03/10 00:00, 24F
推
03/10 00:00, , 25F
03/10 00:00, 25F
→
03/10 00:00, , 26F
03/10 00:00, 26F
推
03/10 00:00, , 27F
03/10 00:00, 27F
→
03/10 00:00, , 28F
03/10 00:00, 28F
→
03/10 00:01, , 29F
03/10 00:01, 29F
推
03/10 00:02, , 30F
03/10 00:02, 30F
聽你這麼一說 我反而覺得看習慣彈力球聯盟後
剛剛看到6分差時也覺得沒甚麼大不了的XD
→
03/10 00:02, , 31F
03/10 00:02, 31F
→
03/10 00:02, , 32F
03/10 00:02, 32F
→
03/10 00:02, , 33F
03/10 00:02, 33F
→
03/10 00:02, , 34F
03/10 00:02, 34F
→
03/10 00:02, , 35F
03/10 00:02, 35F
→
03/10 00:02, , 36F
03/10 00:02, 36F
※ 編輯: Vemperor (111.250.164.154), 03/10/2017 00:05:34
→
03/10 00:03, , 37F
03/10 00:03, 37F
→
03/10 00:04, , 38F
03/10 00:04, 38F
→
03/10 00:04, , 39F
03/10 00:04, 39F
→
03/10 00:04, , 40F
03/10 00:04, 40F
推
03/10 00:05, , 41F
03/10 00:05, 41F
推
03/10 00:07, , 42F
03/10 00:07, 42F
→
03/10 00:07, , 43F
03/10 00:07, 43F
→
03/10 00:10, , 44F
03/10 00:10, 44F
推
03/10 01:10, , 45F
03/10 01:10, 45F
推
03/10 01:20, , 46F
03/10 01:20, 46F
推
03/10 03:44, , 47F
03/10 03:44, 47F
→
03/10 08:48, , 48F
03/10 08:48, 48F
→
03/10 08:49, , 49F
03/10 08:49, 49F
推
03/11 01:50, , 50F
03/11 01:50, 50F