[問題] 台灣現階段有值得信賴的左投嗎?已回收
如題
昨天那個時間就是證明左投價值的時刻。
如果台灣有個具有壓制力的左投上場解決DIDI,後面的壓力就解套了
勝利也可以留下來。
這情況以後在奧運跟資格賽一定會再出現。
未雨綢繆
不知道鍵盤教練們可以建議資格賽或奧運時台灣能有上得了檯面的左投人選嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.19.240
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489028061.A.3D1.html
推
03/09 10:54, , 1F
03/09 10:54, 1F
推
03/09 10:54, , 2F
03/09 10:54, 2F
推
03/09 10:54, , 3F
03/09 10:54, 3F
推
03/09 10:54, , 4F
03/09 10:54, 4F
推
03/09 10:55, , 5F
03/09 10:55, 5F
推
03/09 10:55, , 6F
03/09 10:55, 6F
推
03/09 10:55, , 7F
03/09 10:55, 7F
推
03/09 10:55, , 8F
03/09 10:55, 8F
→
03/09 10:55, , 9F
03/09 10:55, 9F
→
03/09 10:55, , 10F
03/09 10:55, 10F
推
03/09 10:55, , 11F
03/09 10:55, 11F
推
03/09 10:55, , 12F
03/09 10:55, 12F
→
03/09 10:55, , 13F
03/09 10:55, 13F
推
03/09 10:55, , 14F
03/09 10:55, 14F
不是迷信
而是台灣真的需要不只一個左投
推
03/09 10:55, , 15F
03/09 10:55, 15F
※ 編輯: kauosong (223.137.19.240), 03/09/2017 10:56:51
→
03/09 10:56, , 16F
03/09 10:56, 16F
→
03/09 10:56, , 17F
03/09 10:56, 17F
→
03/09 10:57, , 18F
03/09 10:57, 18F
有個可以信賴的左投,可以增加調度的靈活性。
如果左投不重要,那麼怎麼參賽隊都會帶呢?
※ 編輯: kauosong (223.137.19.240), 03/09/2017 10:58:44
推
03/09 10:57, , 19F
03/09 10:57, 19F
推
03/09 10:58, , 20F
03/09 10:58, 20F
推
03/09 10:58, , 21F
03/09 10:58, 21F
推
03/09 10:58, , 22F
03/09 10:58, 22F
→
03/09 10:58, , 23F
03/09 10:58, 23F
噓
03/09 10:58, , 24F
03/09 10:58, 24F
噓
03/09 10:58, , 25F
03/09 10:58, 25F
推
03/09 10:58, , 26F
03/09 10:58, 26F
推
03/09 10:59, , 27F
03/09 10:59, 27F
→
03/09 10:59, , 28F
03/09 10:59, 28F
推
03/09 10:59, , 29F
03/09 10:59, 29F
→
03/09 10:59, , 30F
03/09 10:59, 30F
→
03/09 10:59, , 31F
03/09 10:59, 31F
→
03/09 10:59, , 32F
03/09 10:59, 32F
→
03/09 11:00, , 33F
03/09 11:00, 33F
→
03/09 11:00, , 34F
03/09 11:00, 34F
推
03/09 11:00, , 35F
03/09 11:00, 35F
→
03/09 11:01, , 36F
03/09 11:01, 36F
還有 44 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
03/09 11:10, , 81F
03/09 11:10, 81F
推
03/09 11:11, , 82F
03/09 11:11, 82F
→
03/09 11:11, , 83F
03/09 11:11, 83F
→
03/09 11:11, , 84F
03/09 11:11, 84F
→
03/09 11:11, , 85F
03/09 11:11, 85F
→
03/09 11:11, , 86F
03/09 11:11, 86F
→
03/09 11:11, , 87F
03/09 11:11, 87F
推
03/09 11:12, , 88F
03/09 11:12, 88F
推
03/09 11:12, , 89F
03/09 11:12, 89F
→
03/09 11:12, , 90F
03/09 11:12, 90F
→
03/09 11:12, , 91F
03/09 11:12, 91F
→
03/09 11:13, , 92F
03/09 11:13, 92F
→
03/09 11:13, , 93F
03/09 11:13, 93F
→
03/09 11:13, , 94F
03/09 11:13, 94F
→
03/09 11:13, , 95F
03/09 11:13, 95F
→
03/09 11:13, , 96F
03/09 11:13, 96F
→
03/09 11:13, , 97F
03/09 11:13, 97F
→
03/09 11:14, , 98F
03/09 11:14, 98F
推
03/09 11:20, , 99F
03/09 11:20, 99F
推
03/09 11:20, , 100F
03/09 11:20, 100F
推
03/09 11:21, , 101F
03/09 11:21, 101F
→
03/09 11:23, , 102F
03/09 11:23, 102F
→
03/09 11:23, , 103F
03/09 11:23, 103F
推
03/09 11:29, , 104F
03/09 11:29, 104F
推
03/09 11:31, , 105F
03/09 11:31, 105F
推
03/09 11:34, , 106F
03/09 11:34, 106F
推
03/09 11:34, , 107F
03/09 11:34, 107F
推
03/09 11:36, , 108F
03/09 11:36, 108F
推
03/09 11:37, , 109F
03/09 11:37, 109F
推
03/09 11:47, , 110F
03/09 11:47, 110F
推
03/09 11:49, , 111F
03/09 11:49, 111F
推
03/09 11:50, , 112F
03/09 11:50, 112F
噓
03/09 11:54, , 113F
03/09 11:54, 113F
→
03/09 11:54, , 114F
03/09 11:54, 114F
→
03/09 11:57, , 115F
03/09 11:57, 115F
→
03/09 11:57, , 116F
03/09 11:57, 116F
推
03/09 12:12, , 117F
03/09 12:12, 117F
→
03/09 12:25, , 118F
03/09 12:25, 118F
推
03/09 12:26, , 119F
03/09 12:26, 119F
→
03/09 17:23, , 120F
03/09 17:23, 120F