[新聞] 林煜清的低潮 銳威:投過量或調整有問題已回收
「奶茶」林煜清自從2012年加盟兄弟象之後,一直到2015年,總共出賽89場,全都是先發
,其中前3年平均每年投球局數超過150局,堪稱是中職本土投手中最能吃局數的一位。
但清仔在2015年後段開始下滑,去年全季出賽16場都是後援,球速與威力水準都大不如前
3年,但美籍投手教練銳威說:「他今年很好,應該可以慢慢找回過去的水準。」
林煜清過去兩年為什麼會陷入低潮?銳威說:「我沒有看過以前的他,但如果要推測原因
,第一個可能是因為過去投球過量,另外一個原因就是在每次輪值之間的準備工作有問題
,像是牛棚練投太多或其他調整方式不對,當然也可還有其他原因。」
針對去年問題,銳威在春訓時幫林煜清進行調整,今天對警察廳投2局,只被敲1支內野安
打,有2次三振,銳威說:「看他今天投得很有自信,真得很希望他能夠回到先發輪值。
」(謝岱穎/嘉義縣報導)
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/sports/20170218/1059337/
操總 ??振總??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.229.122.160
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1487424862.A.A27.html
→
02/18 21:36, , 1F
02/18 21:36, 1F
推
02/18 21:36, , 2F
02/18 21:36, 2F
推
02/18 21:37, , 3F
02/18 21:37, 3F
推
02/18 21:37, , 4F
02/18 21:37, 4F
推
02/18 21:40, , 5F
02/18 21:40, 5F
推
02/18 21:40, , 6F
02/18 21:40, 6F
推
02/18 21:42, , 7F
02/18 21:42, 7F
推
02/18 21:43, , 8F
02/18 21:43, 8F
推
02/18 21:43, , 9F
02/18 21:43, 9F
→
02/18 21:43, , 10F
02/18 21:43, 10F
推
02/18 21:47, , 11F
02/18 21:47, 11F
→
02/18 21:50, , 12F
02/18 21:50, 12F
推
02/18 21:51, , 13F
02/18 21:51, 13F
推
02/18 21:52, , 14F
02/18 21:52, 14F
推
02/18 21:54, , 15F
02/18 21:54, 15F
推
02/18 22:03, , 16F
02/18 22:03, 16F
→
02/18 22:05, , 17F
02/18 22:05, 17F
推
02/18 22:06, , 18F
02/18 22:06, 18F
推
02/18 22:08, , 19F
02/18 22:08, 19F
推
02/18 22:09, , 20F
02/18 22:09, 20F
推
02/18 22:10, , 21F
02/18 22:10, 21F
推
02/18 22:11, , 22F
02/18 22:11, 22F
→
02/18 22:11, , 23F
02/18 22:11, 23F
推
02/18 22:14, , 24F
02/18 22:14, 24F
→
02/18 22:20, , 25F
02/18 22:20, 25F
推
02/18 22:24, , 26F
02/18 22:24, 26F
→
02/18 22:24, , 27F
02/18 22:24, 27F
推
02/18 22:26, , 28F
02/18 22:26, 28F
→
02/18 22:26, , 29F
02/18 22:26, 29F
推
02/18 22:28, , 30F
02/18 22:28, 30F
→
02/18 22:28, , 31F
02/18 22:28, 31F
→
02/18 22:29, , 32F
02/18 22:29, 32F
推
02/18 22:31, , 33F
02/18 22:31, 33F
→
02/18 22:31, , 34F
02/18 22:31, 34F
推
02/18 22:39, , 35F
02/18 22:39, 35F
推
02/18 22:41, , 36F
02/18 22:41, 36F
推
02/18 22:52, , 37F
02/18 22:52, 37F
→
02/18 22:52, , 38F
02/18 22:52, 38F
→
02/18 22:52, , 39F
02/18 22:52, 39F
推
02/18 22:56, , 40F
02/18 22:56, 40F
噓
02/18 23:05, , 41F
02/18 23:05, 41F
推
02/18 23:31, , 42F
02/18 23:31, 42F
→
02/18 23:35, , 43F
02/18 23:35, 43F
→
02/18 23:35, , 44F
02/18 23:35, 44F
推
02/18 23:43, , 45F
02/18 23:43, 45F
推
02/18 23:44, , 46F
02/18 23:44, 46F
推
02/18 23:48, , 47F
02/18 23:48, 47F
→
02/18 23:49, , 48F
02/18 23:49, 48F
→
02/18 23:52, , 49F
02/18 23:52, 49F
推
02/19 00:31, , 50F
02/19 00:31, 50F
推
02/19 01:49, , 51F
02/19 01:49, 51F
推
02/19 02:18, , 52F
02/19 02:18, 52F
推
02/19 02:31, , 53F
02/19 02:31, 53F
推
02/19 08:43, , 54F
02/19 08:43, 54F
推
02/19 09:45, , 55F
02/19 09:45, 55F
推
02/19 09:46, , 56F
02/19 09:46, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):