Re: [討論] 我看不到棒球板的進步已回收
不錯了啦
好歹走在正途
之前反象小將軍+小強尼狂的時候
棒球板才是真讓人驚嘆
反象又看風向的小將軍助長球迷亂鬥,還有只會看風向發言
小強尼則是中職鐵粉,只要說中職不好就被罵
搞到韓職專家都不來了
只有興農解散的那幾個月棒球板才比較安靜
可以說一片哀嚎
爽到我,罵得再大聲都沒人說話
棒球板基本上是進步中的,包含二軍的重要,制度的重要都被人接受
特別感謝韓職專家,沒有他介紹韓職,我是無法從中比較出中職的缺點
日美職強大得太早,很難去考究了
但韓職起飛不過10年光影,所以這路徑很清楚,也是中職可以學習的唯一範本
如果沒韓職專家,現在我們對韓職的觀念還停留在03亞錦的團長吧
就是幾乎拉打、打者比較強、只比中職強一點
棒球板目前該做的就是破除風向
批評一個人或一個單位很容易,但批評要有內容
比如說杜肚不會教,結果拿民明網當證據,這就很可惜了嘛
就像說XXX很爛,我是在菜市場的三叔婆的表姑媽的奶媽說的
這有可信度嗎?
優質的板絕對不是充斥數據文或歷史考究文
而是有邏輯的有內容的文
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.168.39.249
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1486568193.A.3CE.html
推
02/08 23:38, , 1F
02/08 23:38, 1F
推
02/08 23:38, , 2F
02/08 23:38, 2F
推
02/08 23:38, , 3F
02/08 23:38, 3F
→
02/08 23:39, , 4F
02/08 23:39, 4F
※ 編輯: takuminauki (1.168.39.249), 02/08/2017 23:42:38
推
02/08 23:50, , 5F
02/08 23:50, 5F
推
02/08 23:54, , 6F
02/08 23:54, 6F
推
02/08 23:54, , 7F
02/08 23:54, 7F
推
02/08 23:57, , 8F
02/08 23:57, 8F
推
02/08 23:57, , 9F
02/08 23:57, 9F
→
02/08 23:57, , 10F
02/08 23:57, 10F
→
02/08 23:59, , 11F
02/08 23:59, 11F
推
02/09 00:04, , 12F
02/09 00:04, 12F
推
02/09 00:14, , 13F
02/09 00:14, 13F
推
02/09 00:17, , 14F
02/09 00:17, 14F
→
02/09 00:17, , 15F
02/09 00:17, 15F
推
02/09 00:18, , 16F
02/09 00:18, 16F
→
02/09 00:18, , 17F
02/09 00:18, 17F
噓
02/09 00:26, , 18F
02/09 00:26, 18F
推
02/09 00:27, , 19F
02/09 00:27, 19F
→
02/09 00:29, , 20F
02/09 00:29, 20F
→
02/09 00:30, , 21F
02/09 00:30, 21F
推
02/09 00:30, , 22F
02/09 00:30, 22F
→
02/09 00:30, , 23F
02/09 00:30, 23F
→
02/09 00:31, , 24F
02/09 00:31, 24F
噓
02/09 00:32, , 25F
02/09 00:32, 25F
→
02/09 00:32, , 26F
02/09 00:32, 26F
→
02/09 00:33, , 27F
02/09 00:33, 27F
推
02/09 00:41, , 28F
02/09 00:41, 28F
推
02/09 00:45, , 29F
02/09 00:45, 29F
→
02/09 00:45, , 30F
02/09 00:45, 30F
推
02/09 01:01, , 31F
02/09 01:01, 31F
→
02/09 01:02, , 32F
02/09 01:02, 32F
→
02/09 01:02, , 33F
02/09 01:02, 33F
推
02/09 01:17, , 34F
02/09 01:17, 34F
推
02/09 01:18, , 35F
02/09 01:18, 35F
→
02/09 01:18, , 36F
02/09 01:18, 36F
推
02/09 01:26, , 37F
02/09 01:26, 37F
→
02/09 01:47, , 38F
02/09 01:47, 38F
推
02/09 01:49, , 39F
02/09 01:49, 39F
推
02/09 01:59, , 40F
02/09 01:59, 40F
→
02/09 02:15, , 41F
02/09 02:15, 41F
推
02/09 03:10, , 42F
02/09 03:10, 42F
推
02/09 06:35, , 43F
02/09 06:35, 43F
推
02/09 07:18, , 44F
02/09 07:18, 44F
噓
02/09 07:23, , 45F
02/09 07:23, 45F
推
02/09 08:19, , 46F
02/09 08:19, 46F
→
02/09 08:20, , 47F
02/09 08:20, 47F
推
02/09 08:55, , 48F
02/09 08:55, 48F
噓
02/09 09:18, , 49F
02/09 09:18, 49F
噓
02/09 09:24, , 50F
02/09 09:24, 50F
→
02/09 09:24, , 51F
02/09 09:24, 51F
噓
02/09 09:37, , 52F
02/09 09:37, 52F
推
02/09 09:38, , 53F
02/09 09:38, 53F
噓
02/09 12:42, , 54F
02/09 12:42, 54F
→
02/09 12:43, , 55F
02/09 12:43, 55F
推
02/09 13:56, , 56F
02/09 13:56, 56F
噓
02/09 14:04, , 57F
02/09 14:04, 57F
噓
02/09 15:43, , 58F
02/09 15:43, 58F
→
02/10 08:15, , 59F
02/10 08:15, 59F
→
02/10 08:16, , 60F
02/10 08:16, 60F
→
02/13 18:26, , 61F
02/13 18:26, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):
討論
-19
172