[閒聊] 日職方面會不會心裡很不爽?已回收
我剛自己快速大概數了一下(或許會有一點誤差),日職東西軍加起來,第一指名9位,第二指
名11位,第三指名5位,也就是前三指名共25位。
一看就是誠意十足,看得起冬聯,尤其去年的培訓隊力壓日職,想說終於出現可以匹敵的
對手,今年完全派出潛力新秀來沒什麼保留,給足主辦國台灣十足面子。
但.....來到台灣後....心理面會不會很斡,怎麼中職派這種出來,培訓隊也沒去年強,
東軍倒還好,西軍完全沒練到的感覺,明年說不定名單就會打折,不用派那麼好的出來
。
日職會不會覺得中職很沒禮貌,基於平等互惠以及禮尚往來原則,中職也應該多派前幾輪
的出來打吧,都第幾屆了還這樣,前三屆草創初期多包容一下就算了,現在應該上軌道了
還這麼隨便。
每次都台灣方面賺到,而日本在浪費時間浪費錢,各位想像日職可以忍耐多久這種情形?
冬盟的成功日職幫助很大,沒日職的捧場根本撐不到現在,萬一真的得罪日職這樣好嗎?
日職禮貌上絕對會說沒問題?但日本人是出了名的表面禮貌一流,心裡想的常常不一樣。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.37.220.106
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1480834576.A.F7E.html
推
12/04 14:57, , 1F
12/04 14:57, 1F
→
12/04 14:58, , 2F
12/04 14:58, 2F
→
12/04 14:58, , 3F
12/04 14:58, 3F
推
12/04 14:58, , 4F
12/04 14:58, 4F
推
12/04 14:58, , 5F
12/04 14:58, 5F
→
12/04 14:58, , 6F
12/04 14:58, 6F
→
12/04 14:59, , 7F
12/04 14:59, 7F
→
12/04 14:59, , 8F
12/04 14:59, 8F
→
12/04 14:59, , 9F
12/04 14:59, 9F
推
12/04 15:00, , 10F
12/04 15:00, 10F
推
12/04 15:00, , 11F
12/04 15:00, 11F
→
12/04 15:01, , 12F
12/04 15:01, 12F
推
12/04 15:01, , 13F
12/04 15:01, 13F
推
12/04 15:01, , 14F
12/04 15:01, 14F
推
12/04 15:01, , 15F
12/04 15:01, 15F
→
12/04 15:02, , 16F
12/04 15:02, 16F
推
12/04 15:05, , 17F
12/04 15:05, 17F
→
12/04 15:05, , 18F
12/04 15:05, 18F
→
12/04 15:05, , 19F
12/04 15:05, 19F
推
12/04 15:05, , 20F
12/04 15:05, 20F
推
12/04 15:06, , 21F
12/04 15:06, 21F
→
12/04 15:06, , 22F
12/04 15:06, 22F
推
12/04 15:06, , 23F
12/04 15:06, 23F
推
12/04 15:07, , 24F
12/04 15:07, 24F
→
12/04 15:07, , 25F
12/04 15:07, 25F
→
12/04 15:07, , 26F
12/04 15:07, 26F
推
12/04 15:08, , 27F
12/04 15:08, 27F
推
12/04 15:10, , 28F
12/04 15:10, 28F
推
12/04 15:10, , 29F
12/04 15:10, 29F
→
12/04 15:10, , 30F
12/04 15:10, 30F
→
12/04 15:10, , 31F
12/04 15:10, 31F
推
12/04 15:10, , 32F
12/04 15:10, 32F
→
12/04 15:11, , 33F
12/04 15:11, 33F
推
12/04 15:13, , 34F
12/04 15:13, 34F
推
12/04 15:13, , 35F
12/04 15:13, 35F
噓
12/04 15:14, , 36F
12/04 15:14, 36F
推
12/04 15:15, , 37F
12/04 15:15, 37F
→
12/04 15:15, , 38F
12/04 15:15, 38F
→
12/04 15:16, , 39F
12/04 15:16, 39F
還有 41 則推文
→
12/04 15:54, , 81F
12/04 15:54, 81F
噓
12/04 15:56, , 82F
12/04 15:56, 82F
推
12/04 15:57, , 83F
12/04 15:57, 83F
→
12/04 15:57, , 84F
12/04 15:57, 84F
推
12/04 15:59, , 85F
12/04 15:59, 85F
推
12/04 15:59, , 86F
12/04 15:59, 86F
推
12/04 16:00, , 87F
12/04 16:00, 87F
→
12/04 16:00, , 88F
12/04 16:00, 88F
→
12/04 16:00, , 89F
12/04 16:00, 89F
→
12/04 16:01, , 90F
12/04 16:01, 90F
推
12/04 16:01, , 91F
12/04 16:01, 91F
→
12/04 16:02, , 92F
12/04 16:02, 92F
→
12/04 16:02, , 93F
12/04 16:02, 93F
→
12/04 16:03, , 94F
12/04 16:03, 94F
→
12/04 16:03, , 95F
12/04 16:03, 95F
→
12/04 16:04, , 96F
12/04 16:04, 96F
→
12/04 16:05, , 97F
12/04 16:05, 97F
→
12/04 16:05, , 98F
12/04 16:05, 98F
→
12/04 16:05, , 99F
12/04 16:05, 99F
→
12/04 16:06, , 100F
12/04 16:06, 100F
噓
12/04 16:06, , 101F
12/04 16:06, 101F
推
12/04 16:07, , 102F
12/04 16:07, 102F
→
12/04 16:07, , 103F
12/04 16:07, 103F
→
12/04 16:12, , 104F
12/04 16:12, 104F
推
12/04 16:13, , 105F
12/04 16:13, 105F
→
12/04 16:14, , 106F
12/04 16:14, 106F
推
12/04 16:15, , 107F
12/04 16:15, 107F
→
12/04 16:25, , 108F
12/04 16:25, 108F
推
12/04 16:47, , 109F
12/04 16:47, 109F
推
12/04 16:58, , 110F
12/04 16:58, 110F
→
12/04 16:58, , 111F
12/04 16:58, 111F
推
12/04 17:12, , 112F
12/04 17:12, 112F
推
12/04 17:22, , 113F
12/04 17:22, 113F
推
12/04 17:26, , 114F
12/04 17:26, 114F
→
12/04 17:27, , 115F
12/04 17:27, 115F
推
12/04 17:33, , 116F
12/04 17:33, 116F
噓
12/04 18:06, , 117F
12/04 18:06, 117F
噓
12/04 18:52, , 118F
12/04 18:52, 118F
推
12/04 21:46, , 119F
12/04 21:46, 119F
→
12/04 21:46, , 120F
12/04 21:46, 120F
討論串 (同標題文章)