[閒聊] 中信鯨當年怎不選擇轉賣球隊?已回收
以當年中信鯨的素質,
在中職也是保持在中間排名,以實力來說不算差
而且職棒20年剛好米迪亞暴龍解散,那年也滿多旅外和大物新秀,
如果趁機在那年補強,實力上應該也很可觀
想問為何中信鯨當年不選擇轉賣球隊?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony F3115.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.119.171
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1478069043.A.E30.html
噓
11/02 14:44, , 1F
11/02 14:44, 1F
→
11/02 14:44, , 2F
11/02 14:44, 2F
→
11/02 14:48, , 3F
11/02 14:48, 3F
→
11/02 14:48, , 4F
11/02 14:48, 4F
→
11/02 14:48, , 5F
11/02 14:48, 5F
推
11/02 14:49, , 6F
11/02 14:49, 6F
→
11/02 14:49, , 7F
11/02 14:49, 7F
→
11/02 14:49, , 8F
11/02 14:49, 8F
→
11/02 14:49, , 9F
11/02 14:49, 9F
推
11/02 14:51, , 10F
11/02 14:51, 10F
→
11/02 14:51, , 11F
11/02 14:51, 11F
→
11/02 14:53, , 12F
11/02 14:53, 12F
推
11/02 14:54, , 13F
11/02 14:54, 13F
→
11/02 14:54, , 14F
11/02 14:54, 14F
以大企業來說,中信鯨經營真的有點差...
推
11/02 14:54, , 15F
11/02 14:54, 15F
我看了好久 原來是新注音
※ 編輯: f22313467 (114.136.119.171), 11/02/2016 14:55:25
推
11/02 14:56, , 16F
11/02 14:56, 16F
→
11/02 14:56, , 17F
11/02 14:56, 17F
推
11/02 14:57, , 18F
11/02 14:57, 18F
推
11/02 14:59, , 19F
11/02 14:59, 19F
洪家當時就在喊不玩了吧?
推
11/02 15:00, , 20F
11/02 15:00, 20F
→
11/02 15:01, , 21F
11/02 15:01, 21F
※ 編輯: f22313467 (114.136.119.171), 11/02/2016 15:01:23
推
11/02 15:01, , 22F
11/02 15:01, 22F
推
11/02 15:02, , 23F
11/02 15:02, 23F
→
11/02 15:02, , 24F
11/02 15:02, 24F
→
11/02 15:03, , 25F
11/02 15:03, 25F
→
11/02 15:04, , 26F
11/02 15:04, 26F
我覺得味全好像不太一樣耶 母企業直接被併購
→
11/02 15:05, , 27F
11/02 15:05, 27F
→
11/02 15:05, , 28F
11/02 15:05, 28F
※ 編輯: f22313467 (114.136.119.171), 11/02/2016 15:06:42
→
11/02 15:07, , 29F
11/02 15:07, 29F
推
11/02 15:09, , 30F
11/02 15:09, 30F
→
11/02 15:10, , 31F
11/02 15:10, 31F
→
11/02 15:10, , 32F
11/02 15:10, 32F
※ 編輯: f22313467 (114.136.119.171), 11/02/2016 15:11:41
噓
11/02 15:13, , 33F
11/02 15:13, 33F
維基是寫併購耶
※ 編輯: f22313467 (114.136.119.171), 11/02/2016 15:16:07
推
11/02 15:24, , 34F
11/02 15:24, 34F
推
11/02 15:36, , 35F
11/02 15:36, 35F
推
11/02 15:47, , 36F
11/02 15:47, 36F
→
11/02 15:47, , 37F
11/02 15:47, 37F
→
11/02 15:47, , 38F
11/02 15:47, 38F
→
11/02 15:47, , 39F
11/02 15:47, 39F
推
11/02 15:50, , 40F
11/02 15:50, 40F
→
11/02 15:51, , 41F
11/02 15:51, 41F
推
11/02 15:55, , 42F
11/02 15:55, 42F
→
11/02 16:02, , 43F
11/02 16:02, 43F
→
11/02 16:02, , 44F
11/02 16:02, 44F
推
11/02 16:03, , 45F
11/02 16:03, 45F
→
11/02 16:04, , 46F
11/02 16:04, 46F
→
11/02 16:13, , 47F
11/02 16:13, 47F
→
11/02 16:13, , 48F
11/02 16:13, 48F
推
11/02 16:16, , 49F
11/02 16:16, 49F
→
11/02 16:27, , 50F
11/02 16:27, 50F
→
11/02 16:28, , 51F
11/02 16:28, 51F
噓
11/02 16:44, , 52F
11/02 16:44, 52F
推
11/02 16:46, , 53F
11/02 16:46, 53F
噓
11/02 17:27, , 54F
11/02 17:27, 54F
噓
11/02 18:28, , 55F
11/02 18:28, 55F
噓
11/03 01:04, , 56F
11/03 01:04, 56F
→
11/03 01:04, , 57F
11/03 01:04, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):