[討論] 紅猴當初為什麼搶不到游擊先發已回收
遙想當年二代象三連霸時最大的對手就是興農牛
兄弟有三劍客 興農有三番刀
牛象大戰是當時票房的保證
現在看到紅猴從業務回來棒球場貢獻所學
不禁想到一位游擊好手 為何當初無法搶到游擊位置呢?
當時牛牛游擊霸是阿讓
論打擊實力 紅猴長打稍差 但安打能力不差
曾經跟酷龍組成九一連線
阿讓全壘打也僅一年突破雙位數 生涯全壘打數更是向張泰山的背號致敬
論內野守備 紅猴一定比較好 畢竟是內野底出身
當時無法搶到游擊位置大家覺得是為何呢?
不是愛將?
還是為了火力最大化?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.184.74.183
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1475412093.A.6E2.html
→
10/02 20:41, , 1F
10/02 20:41, 1F
→
10/02 20:42, , 2F
10/02 20:42, 2F
推
10/02 20:42, , 3F
10/02 20:42, 3F
→
10/02 20:42, , 4F
10/02 20:42, 4F
推
10/02 20:42, , 5F
10/02 20:42, 5F
推
10/02 20:42, , 6F
10/02 20:42, 6F
→
10/02 20:42, , 7F
10/02 20:42, 7F
推
10/02 20:43, , 8F
10/02 20:43, 8F
→
10/02 20:43, , 9F
10/02 20:43, 9F
→
10/02 20:43, , 10F
10/02 20:43, 10F
推
10/02 20:43, , 11F
10/02 20:43, 11F
推
10/02 20:43, , 12F
10/02 20:43, 12F
→
10/02 20:43, , 13F
10/02 20:43, 13F
→
10/02 20:43, , 14F
10/02 20:43, 14F
→
10/02 20:43, , 15F
10/02 20:43, 15F
→
10/02 20:44, , 16F
10/02 20:44, 16F
推
10/02 20:44, , 17F
10/02 20:44, 17F
→
10/02 20:44, , 18F
10/02 20:44, 18F
推
10/02 20:45, , 19F
10/02 20:45, 19F
推
10/02 20:45, , 20F
10/02 20:45, 20F
推
10/02 20:45, , 21F
10/02 20:45, 21F
→
10/02 20:46, , 22F
10/02 20:46, 22F
→
10/02 20:46, , 23F
10/02 20:46, 23F
→
10/02 20:47, , 24F
10/02 20:47, 24F
推
10/02 20:48, , 25F
10/02 20:48, 25F
推
10/02 20:49, , 26F
10/02 20:49, 26F
推
10/02 20:50, , 27F
10/02 20:50, 27F
→
10/02 20:50, , 28F
10/02 20:50, 28F
噓
10/02 20:51, , 29F
10/02 20:51, 29F
推
10/02 20:51, , 30F
10/02 20:51, 30F
推
10/02 20:51, , 31F
10/02 20:51, 31F
→
10/02 20:52, , 32F
10/02 20:52, 32F
推
10/02 20:52, , 33F
10/02 20:52, 33F
→
10/02 20:52, , 34F
10/02 20:52, 34F
→
10/02 20:52, , 35F
10/02 20:52, 35F
→
10/02 20:53, , 36F
10/02 20:53, 36F
→
10/02 20:53, , 37F
10/02 20:53, 37F
推
10/02 20:54, , 38F
10/02 20:54, 38F
→
10/02 20:54, , 39F
10/02 20:54, 39F
→
10/02 20:55, , 40F
10/02 20:55, 40F
推
10/02 20:55, , 41F
10/02 20:55, 41F
推
10/02 20:55, , 42F
10/02 20:55, 42F
→
10/02 20:56, , 43F
10/02 20:56, 43F
推
10/02 20:56, , 44F
10/02 20:56, 44F
→
10/02 20:57, , 45F
10/02 20:57, 45F
推
10/02 20:57, , 46F
10/02 20:57, 46F
→
10/02 20:57, , 47F
10/02 20:57, 47F
推
10/02 20:58, , 48F
10/02 20:58, 48F
→
10/02 20:58, , 49F
10/02 20:58, 49F
→
10/02 20:58, , 50F
10/02 20:58, 50F
→
10/02 20:58, , 51F
10/02 20:58, 51F
→
10/02 20:58, , 52F
10/02 20:58, 52F
推
10/02 20:59, , 53F
10/02 20:59, 53F
推
10/02 21:08, , 54F
10/02 21:08, 54F
推
10/02 21:16, , 55F
10/02 21:16, 55F
推
10/02 21:18, , 56F
10/02 21:18, 56F
→
10/02 21:18, , 57F
10/02 21:18, 57F
推
10/02 21:56, , 58F
10/02 21:56, 58F
→
10/02 22:43, , 59F
10/02 22:43, 59F
推
10/03 00:10, , 60F
10/03 00:10, 60F
推
10/03 01:00, , 61F
10/03 01:00, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):