[閒聊] 請問紅龜穿過52有什麼好酸的?已回收
看一些人噴紅龜什麼
52是鋒哥的
打這種水準沒資格穿
事實是 他穿什麼背號
你我有什麼資格評論
再說他打擊成績怎樣怎樣的人
自己又有踏入中華職棒殿堂的能力嗎......
為什麼一些連選背號都沒資格的人
能夠去批評一個選手沒資格穿52號
這個我可能真的不了解
還望版上睿智的朋友們幫忙解惑
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.141.84.169
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1474349971.A.129.html
推
09/20 13:40, , 1F
09/20 13:40, 1F
籃球之神退休的23號
Green也在穿
怎麼沒人敢嘴他沒資格穿?
※ 編輯: jay251935 (223.141.84.169), 09/20/2016 13:41:17
→
09/20 13:40, , 2F
09/20 13:40, 2F
推
09/20 13:40, , 3F
09/20 13:40, 3F
推
09/20 13:41, , 4F
09/20 13:41, 4F
推
09/20 13:41, , 5F
09/20 13:41, 5F
推
09/20 13:41, , 6F
09/20 13:41, 6F
推
09/20 13:41, , 7F
09/20 13:41, 7F
→
09/20 13:41, , 8F
09/20 13:41, 8F
推
09/20 13:41, , 9F
09/20 13:41, 9F
→
09/20 13:41, , 10F
09/20 13:41, 10F
→
09/20 13:41, , 11F
09/20 13:41, 11F
推
09/20 13:41, , 12F
09/20 13:41, 12F
推
09/20 13:42, , 13F
09/20 13:42, 13F
推
09/20 13:42, , 14F
09/20 13:42, 14F
→
09/20 13:42, , 15F
09/20 13:42, 15F
推
09/20 13:42, , 16F
09/20 13:42, 16F
→
09/20 13:43, , 17F
09/20 13:43, 17F
推
09/20 13:43, , 18F
09/20 13:43, 18F
→
09/20 13:43, , 19F
09/20 13:43, 19F
→
09/20 13:43, , 20F
09/20 13:43, 20F
真的啊
今天你真的有本事進職棒
你要選52 23 都馬隨便你
※ 編輯: jay251935 (223.141.84.169), 09/20/2016 13:44:57
→
09/20 13:44, , 21F
09/20 13:44, 21F
噓
09/20 13:44, , 22F
09/20 13:44, 22F
推
09/20 13:44, , 23F
09/20 13:44, 23F
推
09/20 13:45, , 24F
09/20 13:45, 24F
※ 編輯: jay251935 (223.141.84.169), 09/20/2016 13:45:35
推
09/20 13:45, , 25F
09/20 13:45, 25F
可以評論一個人的實力啊
可是實力跟背號是有什麼關係啊......?
推
09/20 13:46, , 26F
09/20 13:46, 26F
→
09/20 13:46, , 27F
09/20 13:46, 27F
※ 編輯: jay251935 (223.141.84.169), 09/20/2016 13:47:03
推
09/20 13:46, , 28F
09/20 13:46, 28F
推
09/20 13:49, , 29F
09/20 13:49, 29F
那些說為鋒哥抱屈的
真的認為鋒哥會介意誰去穿52號嗎…?
※ 編輯: jay251935 (223.141.84.169), 09/20/2016 13:52:33
噓
09/20 13:57, , 30F
09/20 13:57, 30F
噓
09/20 13:58, , 31F
09/20 13:58, 31F
→
09/20 13:59, , 32F
09/20 13:59, 32F
推
09/20 13:59, , 33F
09/20 13:59, 33F
→
09/20 14:02, , 34F
09/20 14:02, 34F
噓
09/20 14:04, , 35F
09/20 14:04, 35F
噓
09/20 14:06, , 36F
09/20 14:06, 36F
噓
09/20 14:08, , 37F
09/20 14:08, 37F
推
09/20 14:08, , 38F
09/20 14:08, 38F
噓
09/20 14:09, , 39F
09/20 14:09, 39F
噓
09/20 14:13, , 40F
09/20 14:13, 40F
→
09/20 14:20, , 41F
09/20 14:20, 41F
噓
09/20 14:24, , 42F
09/20 14:24, 42F
推
09/20 14:25, , 43F
09/20 14:25, 43F
噓
09/20 14:25, , 44F
09/20 14:25, 44F
噓
09/20 14:25, , 45F
09/20 14:25, 45F
噓
09/20 14:39, , 46F
09/20 14:39, 46F
噓
09/20 14:40, , 47F
09/20 14:40, 47F
噓
09/20 14:40, , 48F
09/20 14:40, 48F
噓
09/20 14:52, , 49F
09/20 14:52, 49F
推
09/20 14:58, , 50F
09/20 14:58, 50F
推
09/20 15:02, , 51F
09/20 15:02, 51F
→
09/20 15:02, , 52F
09/20 15:02, 52F
噓
09/20 15:03, , 53F
09/20 15:03, 53F
噓
09/20 15:04, , 54F
09/20 15:04, 54F
噓
09/20 15:04, , 55F
09/20 15:04, 55F
→
09/20 15:05, , 56F
09/20 15:05, 56F
→
09/20 15:05, , 57F
09/20 15:05, 57F
→
09/20 15:08, , 58F
09/20 15:08, 58F
推
09/20 15:11, , 59F
09/20 15:11, 59F
推
09/20 15:12, , 60F
09/20 15:12, 60F
推
09/20 15:36, , 61F
09/20 15:36, 61F
推
09/20 15:45, , 62F
09/20 15:45, 62F
推
09/20 16:28, , 63F
09/20 16:28, 63F
噓
09/20 16:37, , 64F
09/20 16:37, 64F
推
09/20 16:38, , 65F
09/20 16:38, 65F
噓
09/20 16:52, , 66F
09/20 16:52, 66F
噓
09/20 17:03, , 67F
09/20 17:03, 67F
噓
09/20 17:33, , 68F
09/20 17:33, 68F
推
09/20 17:58, , 69F
09/20 17:58, 69F
噓
09/20 19:23, , 70F
09/20 19:23, 70F
噓
09/20 19:33, , 71F
09/20 19:33, 71F
推
09/20 20:34, , 72F
09/20 20:34, 72F
噓
09/20 23:46, , 73F
09/20 23:46, 73F
噓
09/21 06:12, , 74F
09/21 06:12, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):