[討論] 今天是經典的三方妥協一起無視規則嗎已回收
紅中抗議可能變成
無人出局滿壘
但
紅中妥協不抗議
因為抗議了可能會出現,你自己球員不跑
不能因為裁判,判出局影響當理由
(之前比賽內野判決就出現過)
中途二壘審有判暫停
所以維持原本誤判的判決
一二壘應該是不准動
葉總抗議可能變成
1 2壘有人 一出局
可是他妥協了
怕真的探討下去
變成無人出局滿壘
裁判也很厲害
為了維持比賽流暢
妥協了
無視棒球比賽規則
誤判連發
居然那麼快落幕
一開始我還以為
應該會吵到天荒地老
沒想到那麼快結束
誤判行成一連串錯誤
乾脆再多一個二壘暫停的誤判
負負得正
剛好做出最讓兩隊可以勉強接受的誤判
一出局 二三壘有人
其中手腕拿捏
用誤判來止住前一次誤判可能造成的糾紛
堪稱一絕
這麼經典的狀況
應該是棒球史上難得一幕
有機會上大聯盟官網嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.30.162.196
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1474038504.A.EA6.html
→
09/16 23:09, , 1F
09/16 23:09, 1F
推
09/16 23:10, , 2F
09/16 23:10, 2F
→
09/16 23:11, , 3F
09/16 23:11, 3F
推
09/16 23:11, , 4F
09/16 23:11, 4F
推
09/16 23:13, , 5F
09/16 23:13, 5F
推
09/16 23:14, , 6F
09/16 23:14, 6F
※ 編輯: tn00270144 (110.30.162.196), 09/16/2016 23:18:06
推
09/16 23:16, , 7F
09/16 23:16, 7F
推
09/16 23:16, , 8F
09/16 23:16, 8F
很多人都說釣蝦太誠實
否則就會是,1 2壘有人一出局
其實假如
釣蝦沒有後續一連串反應
更大可能
紅中會挑戰
紅中可能沒看到是否接住
但他一定看到
釣蝦接到球
馬上快傳本壘
接殺是不用快傳本壘的
推
09/16 23:17, , 9F
09/16 23:17, 9F
→
09/16 23:17, , 10F
09/16 23:17, 10F
推
09/16 23:17, , 11F
09/16 23:17, 11F
推
09/16 23:17, , 12F
09/16 23:17, 12F
→
09/16 23:17, , 13F
09/16 23:17, 13F
二壘審有判暫停
推
09/16 23:19, , 14F
09/16 23:19, 14F
推
09/16 23:19, , 15F
09/16 23:19, 15F
噓
09/16 23:20, , 16F
09/16 23:20, 16F
→
09/16 23:20, , 17F
09/16 23:20, 17F
推
09/16 23:22, , 18F
09/16 23:22, 18F
推
09/16 23:22, , 19F
09/16 23:22, 19F
→
09/16 23:22, , 20F
09/16 23:22, 20F
我也很想知道
放眼國內外
有人這樣挑戰的嗎
挑戰對方這球其實是安打
我方並沒有接殺
XD
→
09/16 23:22, , 21F
09/16 23:22, 21F
※ 編輯: tn00270144 (110.30.162.196), 09/16/2016 23:30:04
→
09/16 23:23, , 22F
09/16 23:23, 22F
推
09/16 23:23, , 23F
09/16 23:23, 23F
→
09/16 23:24, , 24F
09/16 23:24, 24F
→
09/16 23:24, , 25F
09/16 23:24, 25F
→
09/16 23:25, , 26F
09/16 23:25, 26F
推
09/16 23:26, , 27F
09/16 23:26, 27F
推
09/16 23:27, , 28F
09/16 23:27, 28F
→
09/16 23:30, , 29F
09/16 23:30, 29F
推
09/16 23:30, , 30F
09/16 23:30, 30F
可惜他當下 本能反應
快傳本壘
這絕對會令紅中懷疑
※ 編輯: tn00270144 (110.30.162.196), 09/16/2016 23:31:41
推
09/16 23:32, , 31F
09/16 23:32, 31F
推
09/16 23:35, , 32F
09/16 23:35, 32F
推
09/16 23:38, , 33F
09/16 23:38, 33F
推
09/16 23:39, , 34F
09/16 23:39, 34F
→
09/16 23:39, , 35F
09/16 23:39, 35F
推
09/16 23:39, , 36F
09/16 23:39, 36F
推
09/16 23:40, , 37F
09/16 23:40, 37F
推
09/16 23:45, , 38F
09/16 23:45, 38F
→
09/16 23:45, , 39F
09/16 23:45, 39F
推
09/16 23:46, , 40F
09/16 23:46, 40F
推
09/16 23:46, , 41F
09/16 23:46, 41F
→
09/16 23:47, , 42F
09/16 23:47, 42F
→
09/16 23:47, , 43F
09/16 23:47, 43F
推
09/16 23:48, , 44F
09/16 23:48, 44F
→
09/16 23:48, , 45F
09/16 23:48, 45F
推
09/16 23:53, , 46F
09/16 23:53, 46F
→
09/16 23:53, , 47F
09/16 23:53, 47F
真的嗎
挑戰規則之中
有規定不能挑戰外野接殺與否?
還是主審有權利無視規則
不給挑戰
真的如此那我誤會紅中
更欽佩
主審的掌握比賽流暢度
無視規則的恥度
推
09/16 23:54, , 48F
09/16 23:54, 48F
推
09/16 23:55, , 49F
09/16 23:55, 49F
誤判的那麼經典
絕對罕見
※ 編輯: tn00270144 (110.30.162.196), 09/16/2016 23:59:39
→
09/16 23:55, , 50F
09/16 23:55, 50F
推
09/16 23:55, , 51F
09/16 23:55, 51F
推
09/16 23:56, , 52F
09/16 23:56, 52F
→
09/16 23:56, , 53F
09/16 23:56, 53F
→
09/16 23:56, , 54F
09/16 23:56, 54F
→
09/16 23:57, , 55F
09/16 23:57, 55F
推
09/16 23:57, , 56F
09/16 23:57, 56F
→
09/16 23:57, , 57F
09/16 23:57, 57F
→
09/16 23:57, , 58F
09/16 23:57, 58F
→
09/16 23:58, , 59F
09/16 23:58, 59F
推
09/16 23:58, , 60F
09/16 23:58, 60F
→
09/16 23:58, , 61F
09/16 23:58, 61F
推
09/17 00:07, , 62F
09/17 00:07, 62F
→
09/17 00:29, , 63F
09/17 00:29, 63F
推
09/17 00:30, , 64F
09/17 00:30, 64F
→
09/17 00:32, , 65F
09/17 00:32, 65F
→
09/17 00:42, , 66F
09/17 00:42, 66F
二壘審有喊暫停
所以照正常規則
不能有人進壘
也不會有人出局
推
09/17 00:44, , 67F
09/17 00:44, 67F
※ 編輯: tn00270144 (110.30.162.196), 09/17/2016 00:45:38
→
09/17 00:47, , 68F
09/17 00:47, 68F
→
09/17 00:48, , 69F
09/17 00:48, 69F
→
09/17 00:51, , 70F
09/17 00:51, 70F
推
09/17 11:23, , 71F
09/17 11:23, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):