Re: [閒聊] 當初鋒哥fa時其他三隊怎都沒買?已回收
※ 引述《QchchQ (情比金堅)》之銘言:
: 看三隊替鋒哥引退辦的活動
: 球員也都希望鋒哥繼續打
: 鄉民也認為鋒哥還能打
: 就算不打也是休息室精神領袖 地下打教
: 狂罵lm糟蹋消費鋒哥
: 那在當初鋒哥提fa時 怎麼其他三隊都沒人要?
噓
,
噓
,
噓
,
噓
,
→
,
有幾個問題想要釐清一下,
請問中信是買了鄭達鴻之後,才發現只能招攬兩位FA球員嗎?
我想應該不是吧,規則原本就清清楚楚寫在那邊,
明明就是中信自己盤算過買鄭達鴻 > 陳金鋒,
爪爪怎麼就是不肯承認自己主子認為買鄭達鴻的價值好過陳金鋒?
再說,有新聞講到領隊會議有要改FA只能招攬兩位的制度嗎?
我印象中的新聞是領隊會議都只有討論到轉隊費的部分,
而且有人擋?請問爪寶們可以給出新聞事實嗎?
還是就用 "領隊會議欲修改自由球員制度" 這樣的新聞標題來腦補呢?
而且只能招攬2位FA,也不是獨步全球,NPB也是這樣玩,最多吸收2位FA。
除非自由球員市場球員超過30人,才可以再多吸收1位,至多5人。
提到米糕佔制度優勢的就更好笑了,2015年鋒哥月薪也才25萬,
FA轉隊費連400萬都不到,這點銀彈拿不出來就說米糕佔優勢,
我只想說爪寶太小看富爸爸了吧。
就承認事實,統一義大因為正在進行球隊換新血,所以不招攬鋒哥,
中信因為缺捕手,盤算過鄭達鴻的價值好過陳金鋒,因此未招攬。
DH滿成那樣跟我說想要買陳金鋒?那怎麼不去延攬張泰山 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.35.13.149
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473991199.A.EA7.html
推
09/16 10:03, , 1F
09/16 10:03, 1F
推
09/16 10:03, , 2F
09/16 10:03, 2F
推
09/16 10:06, , 3F
09/16 10:06, 3F
→
09/16 10:06, , 4F
09/16 10:06, 4F
推
09/16 10:11, , 5F
09/16 10:11, 5F
→
09/16 10:18, , 6F
09/16 10:18, 6F
推
09/16 10:19, , 7F
09/16 10:19, 7F
→
09/16 10:20, , 8F
09/16 10:20, 8F
義大有開價我覺得有可能,
但是可能是只有開一年約,
鋒哥自己再宣告退休時有提到,
"FA轉隊如果只有一年,意義不大"
統一不留泰山,應該不可能打臉自己吸收金鋒。
※ 編輯: Lovetan (42.72.157.102), 09/16/2016 10:25:43
推
09/16 10:25, , 9F
09/16 10:25, 9F
噓
09/16 10:28, , 10F
09/16 10:28, 10F
→
09/16 10:29, , 11F
09/16 10:29, 11F
→
09/16 10:29, , 12F
09/16 10:29, 12F
推
09/16 10:30, , 13F
09/16 10:30, 13F
→
09/16 10:30, , 14F
09/16 10:30, 14F
→
09/16 10:30, , 15F
09/16 10:30, 15F
→
09/16 10:30, , 16F
09/16 10:30, 16F
那爪爪不要再用只能買兩位來說嘴了好嗎
※ 編輯: Lovetan (42.72.157.102), 09/16/2016 10:32:13
→
09/16 10:32, , 17F
09/16 10:32, 17F
噓
09/16 10:33, , 18F
09/16 10:33, 18F
→
09/16 10:35, , 19F
09/16 10:35, 19F
→
09/16 10:35, , 20F
09/16 10:35, 20F
→
09/16 10:35, , 21F
09/16 10:35, 21F
噓
09/16 10:36, , 22F
09/16 10:36, 22F
→
09/16 10:36, , 23F
09/16 10:36, 23F
噓
09/16 10:37, , 24F
09/16 10:37, 24F
誰說不買就是不尊重??
→
09/16 10:37, , 25F
09/16 10:37, 25F
→
09/16 10:37, , 26F
09/16 10:37, 26F
※ 編輯: Lovetan (42.72.157.102), 09/16/2016 10:39:12
→
09/16 10:38, , 27F
09/16 10:38, 27F
噓
09/16 10:39, , 28F
09/16 10:39, 28F
→
09/16 10:39, , 29F
09/16 10:39, 29F
還有 274 則推文
→
09/16 12:02, , 304F
09/16 12:02, 304F
→
09/16 12:02, , 305F
09/16 12:02, 305F
推
09/16 12:06, , 306F
09/16 12:06, 306F
噓
09/16 12:06, , 307F
09/16 12:06, 307F
噓
09/16 12:07, , 308F
09/16 12:07, 308F
→
09/16 12:07, , 309F
09/16 12:07, 309F
→
09/16 12:07, , 310F
09/16 12:07, 310F
推
09/16 12:07, , 311F
09/16 12:07, 311F
→
09/16 12:08, , 312F
09/16 12:08, 312F
推
09/16 12:10, , 313F
09/16 12:10, 313F
噓
09/16 12:13, , 314F
09/16 12:13, 314F
推
09/16 12:13, , 315F
09/16 12:13, 315F
推
09/16 12:22, , 316F
09/16 12:22, 316F
推
09/16 12:22, , 317F
09/16 12:22, 317F
推
09/16 12:22, , 318F
09/16 12:22, 318F
→
09/16 12:22, , 319F
09/16 12:22, 319F
推
09/16 12:40, , 320F
09/16 12:40, 320F
→
09/16 12:40, , 321F
09/16 12:40, 321F
推
09/16 13:07, , 322F
09/16 13:07, 322F
噓
09/16 13:09, , 323F
09/16 13:09, 323F
→
09/16 13:27, , 324F
09/16 13:27, 324F
推
09/16 13:47, , 325F
09/16 13:47, 325F
推
09/16 13:51, , 326F
09/16 13:51, 326F
推
09/16 13:59, , 327F
09/16 13:59, 327F
推
09/16 14:02, , 328F
09/16 14:02, 328F
推
09/16 14:04, , 329F
09/16 14:04, 329F
推
09/16 14:07, , 330F
09/16 14:07, 330F
推
09/16 14:09, , 331F
09/16 14:09, 331F
推
09/16 14:59, , 332F
09/16 14:59, 332F
→
09/16 14:59, , 333F
09/16 14:59, 333F
推
09/16 15:46, , 334F
09/16 15:46, 334F
推
09/16 15:57, , 335F
09/16 15:57, 335F
噓
09/16 16:59, , 336F
09/16 16:59, 336F
→
09/16 17:00, , 337F
09/16 17:00, 337F
噓
09/16 17:02, , 338F
09/16 17:02, 338F
推
09/16 17:54, , 339F
09/16 17:54, 339F
→
09/16 17:55, , 340F
09/16 17:55, 340F
推
09/16 17:57, , 341F
09/16 17:57, 341F
→
09/16 17:57, , 342F
09/16 17:57, 342F
推
09/16 19:15, , 343F
09/16 19:15, 343F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):