[討論] 大谷與日職時期的達比修已回收
達比修有 2005~2011
W L ERA IP WHIP H9 HR9 BB9 SO SO9
05 5 5 3.53 94.1 1.537 9.3 0.7 4.6 52 5.0
06 12 5 2.89 149.2 1.283 7.7 0.7 3.8 115 6.9
07 15 5 1.82 207.2 0.828 5.3 0.4 2.1 210 9.1
08 16 4 1.88 200.2 0.897 6.1 0.5 2.0 208 9.3
09 15 5 1.73 182.0 0.896 5.8 0.4 2.2 167 8.3
10 12 6 1.78 202.0 1.015 7.0 0.2 2.1 222 9.9
11 18 6 1.44 232.0 0.828 6.1 0.2 1.4 276 10.7
大谷翔平 13~16(2016/9/13)
W L ERA IP WHIP H9 HR9 BB9 SO SO9
13 3 0 4.23 61.2 1.459 8.3 0.6 4.8 46 6.7
14 11 4 2.61 155.1 1.172 7.2 0.4 3.3 179 10.4
15 15 5 2.24 160.2 0.909 5.6 0.4 2.6 196 11.0
16 8 4 2.06 118.0 1.017 6.1 0.3 3.1 142 10.8
PS:今天大谷才剛先發完一場,不過成績應該還沒那麼快更新。
這兩位投手在18歲就有出賽的紀錄,而且新人年之後成績逐漸地越來越好。
小弟我很想知道大谷可以進化到什麼程度,
於是就拿以前在日職可說是大殺四方的達比做比較。
大谷贏年輕的達比的地方大概就是三振能力,從第二年開始K9值都在10以上,
我想應該跟他的剛猛的速球也有滿大的關係。
不過達比吃局數的能力以及對球的控制能力我想大概比大谷好很多,
這點可以從WHIP值看出端倪。
再者當時的達比除了擁有相當高水準的快速球之外,他的變化球也是相當厲害,
我想當時面對達比的打者應該有種絕望的感覺(我猜的XD)
從這上面的數據簡略比較之後,大谷日後的目標大概就是加強對於球的控制能力,
雖說以他的快速球就算不小心失投也是有很大的容錯空間,
不過我之前看到有鄉民說大谷偶爾會把自己投倒,大概就是這樣平均每場"只有"
6、7局吧? (XD)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.170.120.158
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473774458.A.29B.html
推
09/13 21:48, , 1F
09/13 21:48, 1F
→
09/13 21:48, , 2F
09/13 21:48, 2F
推
09/13 21:48, , 3F
09/13 21:48, 3F
推
09/13 21:48, , 4F
09/13 21:48, 4F
推
09/13 21:48, , 5F
09/13 21:48, 5F
→
09/13 21:48, , 6F
09/13 21:48, 6F
→
09/13 21:49, , 7F
09/13 21:49, 7F
→
09/13 21:49, , 8F
09/13 21:49, 8F
→
09/13 21:49, , 9F
09/13 21:49, 9F
→
09/13 21:49, , 10F
09/13 21:49, 10F
推
09/13 21:49, , 11F
09/13 21:49, 11F
這點我也有想過,總不能整個職業生涯都走二刀流吧...
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 21:51:08
→
09/13 21:50, , 12F
09/13 21:50, 12F
→
09/13 21:50, , 13F
09/13 21:50, 13F
→
09/13 21:50, , 14F
09/13 21:50, 14F
推
09/13 21:50, , 15F
09/13 21:50, 15F
推
09/13 21:51, , 16F
09/13 21:51, 16F
推
09/13 21:51, , 17F
09/13 21:51, 17F
→
09/13 21:51, , 18F
09/13 21:51, 18F
推
09/13 21:51, , 19F
09/13 21:51, 19F
噓
09/13 21:51, , 20F
09/13 21:51, 20F
→
09/13 21:52, , 21F
09/13 21:52, 21F
推
09/13 21:52, , 22F
09/13 21:52, 22F
推
09/13 21:53, , 23F
09/13 21:53, 23F
→
09/13 21:53, , 24F
09/13 21:53, 24F
推
09/13 21:53, , 25F
09/13 21:53, 25F
推
09/13 21:53, , 26F
09/13 21:53, 26F
→
09/13 21:53, , 27F
09/13 21:53, 27F
推
09/13 21:55, , 28F
09/13 21:55, 28F
→
09/13 21:55, , 29F
09/13 21:55, 29F
推
09/13 21:55, , 30F
09/13 21:55, 30F
我覺得跟擊中球的能力比較有關係吧,日職很注重contact,
所以應該還是比韓職更能夠打到大谷的快速球。
推
09/13 21:55, , 31F
09/13 21:55, 31F
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 21:58:13
→
09/13 21:55, , 32F
09/13 21:55, 32F
推
09/13 21:56, , 33F
09/13 21:56, 33F
→
09/13 21:57, , 34F
09/13 21:57, 34F
→
09/13 21:57, , 35F
09/13 21:57, 35F
大哥,我拿的是05~11的數據耶....
又不是現在的達比修。
還有 73 則推文
還有 11 段內文
推
09/13 22:29, , 109F
09/13 22:29, 109F
→
09/13 22:29, , 110F
09/13 22:29, 110F
→
09/13 22:29, , 111F
09/13 22:29, 111F
→
09/13 22:30, , 112F
09/13 22:30, 112F
不曉得有沒有投滑球的數據?
→
09/13 22:31, , 113F
09/13 22:31, 113F
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 22:32:03
推
09/13 22:32, , 114F
09/13 22:32, 114F
像是那種被打擊率拉,使用比率之類的。
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 22:33:45
→
09/13 22:33, , 115F
09/13 22:33, 115F
→
09/13 22:33, , 116F
09/13 22:33, 116F
→
09/13 22:35, , 117F
09/13 22:35, 117F
→
09/13 22:36, , 118F
09/13 22:36, 118F
原來滑球使用比率比指叉高阿(筆記)
→
09/13 22:36, , 119F
09/13 22:36, 119F
→
09/13 22:36, , 120F
09/13 22:36, 120F
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 22:37:38
→
09/13 22:37, , 121F
09/13 22:37, 121F
→
09/13 22:37, , 122F
09/13 22:37, 122F
我怎麼覺得這要是碩士論文你會被釘在牆上(?)
※ 編輯: powernba (1.170.120.158), 09/13/2016 22:38:45
→
09/13 22:38, , 123F
09/13 22:38, 123F
→
09/13 22:38, , 124F
09/13 22:38, 124F
→
09/13 22:41, , 125F
09/13 22:41, 125F
→
09/13 22:41, , 126F
09/13 22:41, 126F
→
09/13 22:41, , 127F
09/13 22:41, 127F
推
09/13 22:44, , 128F
09/13 22:44, 128F
推
09/13 23:25, , 129F
09/13 23:25, 129F
噓
09/13 23:34, , 130F
09/13 23:34, 130F
推
09/14 01:00, , 131F
09/14 01:00, 131F
→
09/14 01:00, , 132F
09/14 01:00, 132F
→
09/14 01:39, , 133F
09/14 01:39, 133F
推
09/14 01:46, , 134F
09/14 01:46, 134F
推
09/14 01:50, , 135F
09/14 01:50, 135F
→
09/14 03:03, , 136F
09/14 03:03, 136F
→
09/14 03:05, , 137F
09/14 03:05, 137F
推
09/14 03:12, , 138F
09/14 03:12, 138F
推
09/14 08:25, , 139F
09/14 08:25, 139F
→
09/14 09:27, , 140F
09/14 09:27, 140F
→
09/14 09:32, , 141F
09/14 09:32, 141F
推
09/14 11:37, , 142F
09/14 11:37, 142F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
45
142