Re: [閒聊] 郭一峰當初為何能在中職待那麼久?已回收
郭一鋒原本是味全的練習生,當年龍隊已經有小葉這個正位捕手,
但還是需要替補,年輕的郭於是就被升上正式球員,
老徐也欣賞他的態度,假若龍隊沒有解散,郭還是有機會競爭第一替補的位子
後來龍隊解散,象隊為何會要他? 還不是教主的省錢政策
郭2000年來時月薪好像才45000,45000的捕手哪裡找?
就算他是自殺棒,問題捕手本就不太重視打擊能力,
何況他打得不行守備還可以扛,45000夠本了啦,
他會有上場機會,除了第一捕手陳瑞昌狀況,傷勢時好時壞外.
另外其他兩個捕手吳聲武與吳柏勳比他更不適任,不像郭還有守備與年輕可塑性,
偏偏錢還比他多,洪教主當然用他覺得最划算的一個,想也知道.
這也是為什麼郭的機會不少,甚至可以打先發,還打那麼多年的緣故?
至少他的守備在捕手這個位子上是及格的,而且低薪又好用.光這點就夠了,
還有一點,郭其實是有點POWER,只是很盲,打擊低迷的情況也一直養不太起來
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.58.182
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1471961221.A.F6A.html
推
08/23 22:10, , 1F
08/23 22:10, 1F
推
08/23 22:11, , 2F
08/23 22:11, 2F
推
08/23 22:11, , 3F
08/23 22:11, 3F
推
08/23 22:13, , 4F
08/23 22:13, 4F
→
08/23 22:13, , 5F
08/23 22:13, 5F
推
08/23 22:13, , 6F
08/23 22:13, 6F
推
08/23 22:13, , 7F
08/23 22:13, 7F
→
08/23 22:14, , 8F
08/23 22:14, 8F
→
08/23 22:14, , 9F
08/23 22:14, 9F
→
08/23 22:14, , 10F
08/23 22:14, 10F
→
08/23 22:15, , 11F
08/23 22:15, 11F
→
08/23 22:16, , 12F
08/23 22:16, 12F
→
08/23 22:16, , 13F
08/23 22:16, 13F
推
08/23 22:16, , 14F
08/23 22:16, 14F
推
08/23 22:16, , 15F
08/23 22:16, 15F
→
08/23 22:17, , 16F
08/23 22:17, 16F
→
08/23 22:18, , 17F
08/23 22:18, 17F
推
08/23 22:18, , 18F
08/23 22:18, 18F
推
08/23 22:21, , 19F
08/23 22:21, 19F
→
08/23 22:23, , 20F
08/23 22:23, 20F
推
08/23 22:28, , 21F
08/23 22:28, 21F
推
08/23 22:30, , 22F
08/23 22:30, 22F
推
08/23 22:30, , 23F
08/23 22:30, 23F
→
08/23 22:30, , 24F
08/23 22:30, 24F
→
08/23 22:31, , 25F
08/23 22:31, 25F
→
08/23 22:31, , 26F
08/23 22:31, 26F
推
08/23 22:31, , 27F
08/23 22:31, 27F
推
08/23 22:33, , 28F
08/23 22:33, 28F
推
08/23 22:35, , 29F
08/23 22:35, 29F
推
08/23 22:36, , 30F
08/23 22:36, 30F
→
08/23 22:36, , 31F
08/23 22:36, 31F
→
08/23 22:36, , 32F
08/23 22:36, 32F
→
08/23 22:36, , 33F
08/23 22:36, 33F
→
08/23 22:37, , 34F
08/23 22:37, 34F
→
08/23 22:37, , 35F
08/23 22:37, 35F
→
08/23 22:38, , 36F
08/23 22:38, 36F
→
08/23 22:38, , 37F
08/23 22:38, 37F
推
08/23 22:39, , 38F
08/23 22:39, 38F
→
08/23 22:39, , 39F
08/23 22:39, 39F
→
08/23 22:41, , 40F
08/23 22:41, 40F
→
08/23 22:41, , 41F
08/23 22:41, 41F
→
08/23 22:42, , 42F
08/23 22:42, 42F
→
08/23 22:43, , 43F
08/23 22:43, 43F
→
08/23 22:44, , 44F
08/23 22:44, 44F
→
08/23 22:45, , 45F
08/23 22:45, 45F
→
08/23 22:46, , 46F
08/23 22:46, 46F
→
08/23 22:46, , 47F
08/23 22:46, 47F
→
08/23 22:47, , 48F
08/23 22:47, 48F
→
08/23 22:47, , 49F
08/23 22:47, 49F
→
08/23 22:48, , 50F
08/23 22:48, 50F
→
08/23 22:48, , 51F
08/23 22:48, 51F
→
08/23 22:48, , 52F
08/23 22:48, 52F
推
08/23 22:52, , 53F
08/23 22:52, 53F
→
08/23 23:03, , 54F
08/23 23:03, 54F
→
08/23 23:10, , 55F
08/23 23:10, 55F
→
08/23 23:10, , 56F
08/23 23:10, 56F
噓
08/23 23:53, , 57F
08/23 23:53, 57F
噓
08/24 08:43, , 58F
08/24 08:43, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):