[新聞] 大聯盟偷換彈力球? 他拿奧圖維來舉例證明已回收
大聯盟偷換彈力球? 他拿奧圖維來舉例證明
2016-07-14 10:08:00 記者路皓惟/綜合報導
大聯盟本季全壘打數激增,場均2.32轟寫下近10年來新高,雖然主席曼弗瑞德表示,全壘
打增加與禁藥和換球無關,不過前紅人投手迪布爾(Rob Dibble)持相反意見,還拿太空
人奧圖維(Jose Altuve)來舉例。
迪布爾對於全壘打數增加,抱著懷疑態度,並拿奧圖維拿舉例,要向大家證明自己的推測
是真的,而他在推特上寫道,「過去球季5轟、7轟的球員,本季出賽89場就敲14轟?沒有
禁藥,沒有換球...拜託。」
這則貼文馬上引起筆戰,太空人迷一致砲轟,認為他毫無證據就亂指控,使得迪布爾也出
面解釋,澄清自己沒有從未將奧圖維和禁藥聯想在一起。事實上,過去迪布爾曾對高梅茲
( Carlos Gomez)說不雅的話,當時就已和太空人迷結梁子。
奧圖維在去年球季揮出15轟,寫下大聯盟個人生涯紀錄,不過今年上半季,奧圖維就已揮
出14轟,即將超越去年球季的15轟,締造個人全壘打新紀錄。
原文網址: 大聯盟偷換彈力球? 他拿奧圖維來舉例證明 | ET運動雲 | ETtoday東森新
聞雲 http://sports.ettoday.net/news/735052#ixzz4ELjOWrBB
Follow us: @ETtodaynet on Twitter | ETtoday on Facebook
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.171.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1468466369.A.FB7.html
推
07/14 11:20, , 1F
07/14 11:20, 1F
推
07/14 11:20, , 2F
07/14 11:20, 2F
→
07/14 11:20, , 3F
07/14 11:20, 3F
推
07/14 11:21, , 4F
07/14 11:21, 4F
→
07/14 11:21, , 5F
07/14 11:21, 5F
推
07/14 11:22, , 6F
07/14 11:22, 6F
推
07/14 11:24, , 7F
07/14 11:24, 7F
推
07/14 11:25, , 8F
07/14 11:25, 8F
推
07/14 11:27, , 9F
07/14 11:27, 9F
推
07/14 11:27, , 10F
07/14 11:27, 10F
推
07/14 11:27, , 11F
07/14 11:27, 11F
推
07/14 11:28, , 12F
07/14 11:28, 12F
推
07/14 11:28, , 13F
07/14 11:28, 13F
→
07/14 11:29, , 14F
07/14 11:29, 14F
→
07/14 11:30, , 15F
07/14 11:30, 15F
推
07/14 11:30, , 16F
07/14 11:30, 16F
推
07/14 11:32, , 17F
07/14 11:32, 17F
推
07/14 11:32, , 18F
07/14 11:32, 18F
推
07/14 11:32, , 19F
07/14 11:32, 19F
推
07/14 11:33, , 20F
07/14 11:33, 20F
推
07/14 11:34, , 21F
07/14 11:34, 21F
推
07/14 11:35, , 22F
07/14 11:35, 22F
推
07/14 11:35, , 23F
07/14 11:35, 23F
推
07/14 11:35, , 24F
07/14 11:35, 24F
推
07/14 11:37, , 25F
07/14 11:37, 25F
→
07/14 11:39, , 26F
07/14 11:39, 26F
推
07/14 11:39, , 27F
07/14 11:39, 27F
→
07/14 11:39, , 28F
07/14 11:39, 28F
推
07/14 11:40, , 29F
07/14 11:40, 29F
推
07/14 11:40, , 30F
07/14 11:40, 30F
推
07/14 11:41, , 31F
07/14 11:41, 31F
→
07/14 11:42, , 32F
07/14 11:42, 32F
噓
07/14 11:43, , 33F
07/14 11:43, 33F
推
07/14 11:43, , 34F
07/14 11:43, 34F
推
07/14 11:43, , 35F
07/14 11:43, 35F
→
07/14 11:44, , 36F
07/14 11:44, 36F
推
07/14 11:46, , 37F
07/14 11:46, 37F
噓
07/14 11:47, , 38F
07/14 11:47, 38F
推
07/14 11:47, , 39F
07/14 11:47, 39F
推
07/14 11:48, , 40F
07/14 11:48, 40F
推
07/14 12:00, , 41F
07/14 12:00, 41F
→
07/14 12:00, , 42F
07/14 12:00, 42F
噓
07/14 12:00, , 43F
07/14 12:00, 43F
推
07/14 12:01, , 44F
07/14 12:01, 44F
推
07/14 12:05, , 45F
07/14 12:05, 45F
→
07/14 12:23, , 46F
07/14 12:23, 46F
推
07/14 12:25, , 47F
07/14 12:25, 47F
推
07/14 12:26, , 48F
07/14 12:26, 48F
→
07/14 12:26, , 49F
07/14 12:26, 49F
推
07/14 12:29, , 50F
07/14 12:29, 50F
推
07/14 12:33, , 51F
07/14 12:33, 51F
→
07/14 12:35, , 52F
07/14 12:35, 52F
推
07/14 12:37, , 53F
07/14 12:37, 53F
→
07/14 12:37, , 54F
07/14 12:37, 54F
→
07/14 12:40, , 55F
07/14 12:40, 55F
→
07/14 12:40, , 56F
07/14 12:40, 56F
噓
07/14 12:41, , 57F
07/14 12:41, 57F
推
07/14 12:48, , 58F
07/14 12:48, 58F
推
07/14 12:54, , 59F
07/14 12:54, 59F
推
07/14 13:01, , 60F
07/14 13:01, 60F
推
07/14 13:05, , 61F
07/14 13:05, 61F
推
07/14 13:24, , 62F
07/14 13:24, 62F
推
07/14 13:34, , 63F
07/14 13:34, 63F
→
07/14 13:37, , 64F
07/14 13:37, 64F
推
07/14 13:42, , 65F
07/14 13:42, 65F
推
07/14 13:43, , 66F
07/14 13:43, 66F
推
07/14 13:45, , 67F
07/14 13:45, 67F
推
07/14 13:51, , 68F
07/14 13:51, 68F
推
07/14 13:59, , 69F
07/14 13:59, 69F

推
07/14 14:00, , 70F
07/14 14:00, 70F
推
07/14 15:04, , 71F
07/14 15:04, 71F
推
07/14 15:24, , 72F
07/14 15:24, 72F
推
07/14 16:52, , 73F
07/14 16:52, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):