[討論] 中職是否該設立薪資上限和豪華稅?已回收
中職漸漸回溫 好現象
球員薪資也越來越高 一切都是正向發展
但為了避免四隊薪資和戰力平衡
是不是該作一些改變了啊?
像是設立薪資上限 避免無限錢鬥
一些比較弱勢的財團吃虧
到時候沒留下球員 球迷也不高興
還有豪華稅制度
若球團總薪資超越了某個額度
就得繳豪華稅給那些較薪資結構弱小的球團
否則會淪為錢鬥 你出價我也出價
最後有些球團資本無法負荷 就拱手專賣
豈不是惡性循環嗎?
設立薪資障礙和豪華稅又可以考驗球團的智慧
還有鬥智鬥腦力的交易手腕
也是一門賣點(例如現在NBA的自由市場)
大家不覺得嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.205.137.191
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1467430263.A.570.html
※ 編輯: going1017 (180.205.137.191), 07/02/2016 11:31:27
噓
07/02 11:31, , 1F
07/02 11:31, 1F
噓
07/02 11:31, , 2F
07/02 11:31, 2F
噓
07/02 11:31, , 3F
07/02 11:31, 3F
噓
07/02 11:31, , 4F
07/02 11:31, 4F
噓
07/02 11:32, , 5F
07/02 11:32, 5F
噓
07/02 11:32, , 6F
07/02 11:32, 6F
噓
07/02 11:32, , 7F
07/02 11:32, 7F
噓
07/02 11:33, , 8F
07/02 11:33, 8F
噓
07/02 11:33, , 9F
07/02 11:33, 9F
噓
07/02 11:33, , 10F
07/02 11:33, 10F
噓
07/02 11:34, , 11F
07/02 11:34, 11F
→
07/02 11:34, , 12F
07/02 11:34, 12F
噓
07/02 11:34, , 13F
07/02 11:34, 13F
→
07/02 11:34, , 14F
07/02 11:34, 14F
噓
07/02 11:35, , 15F
07/02 11:35, 15F
噓
07/02 11:39, , 16F
07/02 11:39, 16F
噓
07/02 11:40, , 17F
07/02 11:40, 17F
噓
07/02 11:40, , 18F
07/02 11:40, 18F
噓
07/02 11:41, , 19F
07/02 11:41, 19F
噓
07/02 11:44, , 20F
07/02 11:44, 20F
噓
07/02 11:45, , 21F
07/02 11:45, 21F
推
07/02 11:46, , 22F
07/02 11:46, 22F
噓
07/02 11:47, , 23F
07/02 11:47, 23F
噓
07/02 11:49, , 24F
07/02 11:49, 24F
噓
07/02 11:49, , 25F
07/02 11:49, 25F
噓
07/02 11:51, , 26F
07/02 11:51, 26F
噓
07/02 11:53, , 27F
07/02 11:53, 27F
噓
07/02 11:53, , 28F
07/02 11:53, 28F
噓
07/02 11:53, , 29F
07/02 11:53, 29F
噓
07/02 11:54, , 30F
07/02 11:54, 30F
噓
07/02 11:58, , 31F
07/02 11:58, 31F
推
07/02 11:58, , 32F
07/02 11:58, 32F
→
07/02 11:59, , 33F
07/02 11:59, 33F
噓
07/02 12:06, , 34F
07/02 12:06, 34F
→
07/02 12:06, , 35F
07/02 12:06, 35F
噓
07/02 12:06, , 36F
07/02 12:06, 36F
噓
07/02 12:07, , 37F
07/02 12:07, 37F
→
07/02 12:10, , 38F
07/02 12:10, 38F
噓
07/02 12:15, , 39F
07/02 12:15, 39F
噓
07/02 12:15, , 40F
07/02 12:15, 40F
噓
07/02 12:17, , 41F
07/02 12:17, 41F
噓
07/02 12:23, , 42F
07/02 12:23, 42F
噓
07/02 12:25, , 43F
07/02 12:25, 43F
噓
07/02 12:27, , 44F
07/02 12:27, 44F
噓
07/02 12:27, , 45F
07/02 12:27, 45F
噓
07/02 12:28, , 46F
07/02 12:28, 46F
→
07/02 12:28, , 47F
07/02 12:28, 47F
噓
07/02 12:30, , 48F
07/02 12:30, 48F
噓
07/02 12:37, , 49F
07/02 12:37, 49F
→
07/02 12:43, , 50F
07/02 12:43, 50F
推
07/02 12:45, , 51F
07/02 12:45, 51F
噓
07/02 12:49, , 52F
07/02 12:49, 52F
→
07/02 12:52, , 53F
07/02 12:52, 53F
→
07/02 12:52, , 54F
07/02 12:52, 54F
噓
07/02 12:56, , 55F
07/02 12:56, 55F
噓
07/02 12:57, , 56F
07/02 12:57, 56F
噓
07/02 12:57, , 57F
07/02 12:57, 57F
推
07/02 13:06, , 58F
07/02 13:06, 58F
噓
07/02 13:21, , 59F
07/02 13:21, 59F
噓
07/02 13:26, , 60F
07/02 13:26, 60F
噓
07/02 13:36, , 61F
07/02 13:36, 61F
推
07/02 13:38, , 62F
07/02 13:38, 62F
噓
07/02 13:45, , 63F
07/02 13:45, 63F
推
07/02 13:48, , 64F
07/02 13:48, 64F
噓
07/02 14:00, , 65F
07/02 14:00, 65F
推
07/02 14:39, , 66F
07/02 14:39, 66F
噓
07/02 14:56, , 67F
07/02 14:56, 67F
→
07/02 15:51, , 68F
07/02 15:51, 68F
噓
07/02 16:07, , 69F
07/02 16:07, 69F
噓
07/02 16:22, , 70F
07/02 16:22, 70F
→
07/02 16:26, , 71F
07/02 16:26, 71F
噓
07/02 16:34, , 72F
07/02 16:34, 72F
推
07/02 16:46, , 73F
07/02 16:46, 73F
→
07/02 22:14, , 74F
07/02 22:14, 74F
噓
07/03 02:06, , 75F
07/03 02:06, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):