[討論] 高中生進入職棒前誰的評價比較高?已回收
以下憑記憶,有待板友補充。
討論三位少年強打
1.陳子豪
2.林承飛
3.申皓瑋
子豪當初被兄弟選到因一句「X小」一炮而紅
印象中選秀前有人說
子豪打擊很全面,是外野版的神全
進入職棒後確實有不錯的成績。
阿飛進職棒前聲勢也是相當浩大,少年強打遊擊手。
進入職棒二軍展現出爆炸性的表現
今年在一軍打擊也很有水準。
申皓瑋 被評比為能成為張志豪等級的球員
速度快,打擊爆發力強,防守判斷傳球能力好
未來進入職棒的表現令人期待。
以同屆的高中生來說
三位都是最頂尖的選手
但如果將三位放到同一年
誰的打擊能力比較強?
三位放在一起會先選誰?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.247.7.61
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1467100425.A.508.html
推
06/28 15:55, , 1F
06/28 15:55, 1F
推
06/28 15:55, , 2F
06/28 15:55, 2F
推
06/28 15:55, , 3F
06/28 15:55, 3F
→
06/28 15:55, , 4F
06/28 15:55, 4F
推
06/28 15:55, , 5F
06/28 15:55, 5F
推
06/28 15:55, , 6F
06/28 15:55, 6F
噓
06/28 15:55, , 7F
06/28 15:55, 7F
推
06/28 15:56, , 8F
06/28 15:56, 8F
→
06/28 15:56, , 9F
06/28 15:56, 9F
※ 編輯: winnie870221 (27.247.7.61), 06/28/2016 15:57:25
→
06/28 15:57, , 10F
06/28 15:57, 10F
→
06/28 15:58, , 11F
06/28 15:58, 11F
推
06/28 15:58, , 12F
06/28 15:58, 12F
推
06/28 15:59, , 13F
06/28 15:59, 13F
是問高中畢業後進職棒前
※ 編輯: winnie870221 (27.247.7.61), 06/28/2016 16:00:23
→
06/28 15:59, , 14F
06/28 15:59, 14F
推
06/28 16:00, , 15F
06/28 16:00, 15F
→
06/28 16:00, , 16F
06/28 16:00, 16F
→
06/28 16:01, , 17F
06/28 16:01, 17F
推
06/28 16:01, , 18F
06/28 16:01, 18F
→
06/28 16:01, , 19F
06/28 16:01, 19F
推
06/28 16:02, , 20F
06/28 16:02, 20F
→
06/28 16:02, , 21F
06/28 16:02, 21F
推
06/28 16:02, , 22F
06/28 16:02, 22F
推
06/28 16:03, , 23F
06/28 16:03, 23F
→
06/28 16:03, , 24F
06/28 16:03, 24F
推
06/28 16:04, , 25F
06/28 16:04, 25F
→
06/28 16:05, , 26F
06/28 16:05, 26F
→
06/28 16:06, , 27F
06/28 16:06, 27F
→
06/28 16:06, , 28F
06/28 16:06, 28F
→
06/28 16:07, , 29F
06/28 16:07, 29F
→
06/28 16:07, , 30F
06/28 16:07, 30F
→
06/28 16:07, , 31F
06/28 16:07, 31F
推
06/28 16:07, , 32F
06/28 16:07, 32F
→
06/28 16:08, , 33F
06/28 16:08, 33F
→
06/28 16:08, , 34F
06/28 16:08, 34F
→
06/28 16:09, , 35F
06/28 16:09, 35F
推
06/28 16:09, , 36F
06/28 16:09, 36F
推
06/28 16:09, , 37F
06/28 16:09, 37F
還有 60 則推文
→
06/28 16:26, , 98F
06/28 16:26, 98F
噓
06/28 16:27, , 99F
06/28 16:27, 99F
推
06/28 16:27, , 100F
06/28 16:27, 100F
→
06/28 16:28, , 101F
06/28 16:28, 101F
推
06/28 16:28, , 102F
06/28 16:28, 102F
推
06/28 16:28, , 103F
06/28 16:28, 103F
→
06/28 16:28, , 104F
06/28 16:28, 104F
→
06/28 16:29, , 105F
06/28 16:29, 105F
推
06/28 16:33, , 106F
06/28 16:33, 106F
推
06/28 16:33, , 107F
06/28 16:33, 107F
推
06/28 16:34, , 108F
06/28 16:34, 108F
→
06/28 16:34, , 109F
06/28 16:34, 109F
→
06/28 16:34, , 110F
06/28 16:34, 110F
推
06/28 16:34, , 111F
06/28 16:34, 111F
推
06/28 16:34, , 112F
06/28 16:34, 112F
推
06/28 16:36, , 113F
06/28 16:36, 113F
推
06/28 16:37, , 114F
06/28 16:37, 114F
推
06/28 16:37, , 115F
06/28 16:37, 115F
→
06/28 16:37, , 116F
06/28 16:37, 116F
推
06/28 16:38, , 117F
06/28 16:38, 117F
推
06/28 16:40, , 118F
06/28 16:40, 118F
推
06/28 16:43, , 119F
06/28 16:43, 119F
推
06/28 16:51, , 120F
06/28 16:51, 120F
推
06/28 16:53, , 121F
06/28 16:53, 121F
→
06/28 16:56, , 122F
06/28 16:56, 122F
推
06/28 17:01, , 123F
06/28 17:01, 123F
→
06/28 17:01, , 124F
06/28 17:01, 124F
推
06/28 17:02, , 125F
06/28 17:02, 125F
→
06/28 17:03, , 126F
06/28 17:03, 126F
→
06/28 17:03, , 127F
06/28 17:03, 127F
推
06/28 17:11, , 128F
06/28 17:11, 128F
推
06/28 17:20, , 129F
06/28 17:20, 129F
推
06/28 17:26, , 130F
06/28 17:26, 130F
推
06/28 17:27, , 131F
06/28 17:27, 131F
推
06/28 17:53, , 132F
06/28 17:53, 132F
推
06/28 17:55, , 133F
06/28 17:55, 133F
→
06/28 17:56, , 134F
06/28 17:56, 134F
噓
06/28 17:57, , 135F
06/28 17:57, 135F
推
06/28 18:31, , 136F
06/28 18:31, 136F
→
06/28 18:32, , 137F
06/28 18:32, 137F