Re: [討論] 韓國人會認為打MLB比打日職簡單嗎?已回收
※ 引述《a10141013 (FlyBall)》之銘言:
: 一投一野
: 吳昇桓.李大浩都是日職直輸MLB
: 而且成績都比在日職好
: 吳昇桓
: 阪神2年 136.0局 105安 11HR 29BB 147K ERA2.25 WHIP0.99
: STL1年 33.2局 17安 1HR 8BB 46K ERA1.60 WHIP0.74
: 李大浩
: 日職4年 2403打席 98HR .293/.370/.486
: 水手1年 108打席 10HR .301/.339/.592
: 韓國人會覺得打MLB比日職簡單嗎?
打者形態跟習性都不同
日本人擅於纏鬥 打不好就給你破壞掉
選球謹慎 很少被三振(相比美韓)
看看我們的C.C.Lee就知道
在美國稱職的當個4A王
回到日本來只會爆爆爆
相比之下他在美國真的比較吃香
每年上去最高殿堂觀光一下也好
--
標題 [問卦] 暖男是在暖三小??
→
09/19 02:30,
09/19 02:30
推
09/19 02:30,
09/19 02:30
噓
09/19 02:30,
09/19 02:30
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.151.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1465625032.A.905.html
推
06/11 14:06, , 1F
06/11 14:06, 1F
→
06/11 14:06, , 2F
06/11 14:06, 2F
→
06/11 14:07, , 3F
06/11 14:07, 3F
→
06/11 14:07, , 4F
06/11 14:07, 4F
推
06/11 14:08, , 5F
06/11 14:08, 5F
→
06/11 14:10, , 6F
06/11 14:10, 6F
→
06/11 14:12, , 7F
06/11 14:12, 7F
推
06/11 14:15, , 8F
06/11 14:15, 8F
→
06/11 14:15, , 9F
06/11 14:15, 9F
推
06/11 14:15, , 10F
06/11 14:15, 10F
→
06/11 14:15, , 11F
06/11 14:15, 11F
→
06/11 14:16, , 12F
06/11 14:16, 12F
可是日職我們是佔著洋將名額啊
不知道什麼時候會被釋出然後簽育成約
在3A穩定輸出就好啦..
※ 編輯: andyll2 (36.231.151.16), 06/11/2016 14:25:08
推
06/11 14:27, , 13F
06/11 14:27, 13F
→
06/11 14:27, , 14F
06/11 14:27, 14F
→
06/11 14:29, , 15F
06/11 14:29, 15F
→
06/11 14:30, , 16F
06/11 14:30, 16F
→
06/11 14:30, , 17F
06/11 14:30, 17F
推
06/11 14:31, , 18F
06/11 14:31, 18F
推
06/11 14:33, , 19F
06/11 14:33, 19F
→
06/11 14:33, , 20F
06/11 14:33, 20F
→
06/11 14:33, , 21F
06/11 14:33, 21F
→
06/11 14:33, , 22F
06/11 14:33, 22F
→
06/11 14:33, , 23F
06/11 14:33, 23F
→
06/11 14:37, , 24F
06/11 14:37, 24F
推
06/11 14:38, , 25F
06/11 14:38, 25F
推
06/11 14:42, , 26F
06/11 14:42, 26F
→
06/11 14:42, , 27F
06/11 14:42, 27F
→
06/11 14:42, , 28F
06/11 14:42, 28F
→
06/11 14:42, , 29F
06/11 14:42, 29F
噓
06/11 14:42, , 30F
06/11 14:42, 30F
推
06/11 14:47, , 31F
06/11 14:47, 31F
→
06/11 14:51, , 32F
06/11 14:51, 32F
→
06/11 14:52, , 33F
06/11 14:52, 33F
→
06/11 14:54, , 34F
06/11 14:54, 34F
→
06/11 15:21, , 35F
06/11 15:21, 35F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):