[閒聊] Kershaw 當年選秀的評價如何?已回收
安喔各位大大
Kershaw幾乎可以說是大聯盟近年來最鬼神的投手
21歲就在大聯盟投出4.4WAR的成績
從09年開始每年的WAR分別是4.4/4.7/7.1/5.9/7.1/7.7/8.6
(殷仔最高2.8 建仔最高3.8)
除了上大聯盟第一年ERA超過3以外 年年都低於3
目前也已拿下三次賽揚獎
不算今年也已經連威了7年
但他在2006年選秀只是第7順位而已 是當年不流行選高中生嗎?
當年選秀前書僮的評價是?
(2006年第三順位龍哥 第10順位Lincecum 第11順位Scherzer)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.244.98
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1463138359.A.D37.html
噓
05/13 19:19, , 1F
05/13 19:19, 1F
噓
05/13 19:20, , 2F
05/13 19:20, 2F
→
05/13 19:21, , 3F
05/13 19:21, 3F
噓
05/13 19:22, , 4F
05/13 19:22, 4F
推
05/13 19:22, , 5F
05/13 19:22, 5F
噓
05/13 19:22, , 6F
05/13 19:22, 6F
噓
05/13 19:23, , 7F
05/13 19:23, 7F
→
05/13 19:23, , 8F
05/13 19:23, 8F
還以為這種神獸一定是前三順位呀
MLB歷史上比書僮威的人也沒幾個吧 @@
況且這篇文的重點是想問當初他的評價是如何 @@
→
05/13 19:23, , 9F
05/13 19:23, 9F
→
05/13 19:23, , 10F
05/13 19:23, 10F
※ 編輯: thid5335 (140.112.244.98), 05/13/2016 19:24:31
→
05/13 19:24, , 11F
05/13 19:24, 11F
→
05/13 19:24, , 12F
05/13 19:24, 12F
→
05/13 19:25, , 13F
05/13 19:25, 13F
推
05/13 19:25, , 14F
05/13 19:25, 14F
推
05/13 19:25, , 15F
05/13 19:25, 15F
→
05/13 19:25, , 16F
05/13 19:25, 16F
推
05/13 19:25, , 17F
05/13 19:25, 17F
噓
05/13 19:26, , 18F
05/13 19:26, 18F
→
05/13 19:26, , 19F
05/13 19:26, 19F
→
05/13 19:26, , 20F
05/13 19:26, 20F
推
05/13 19:26, , 21F
05/13 19:26, 21F
→
05/13 19:26, , 22F
05/13 19:26, 22F
→
05/13 19:27, , 23F
05/13 19:27, 23F
噓
05/13 19:28, , 24F
05/13 19:28, 24F
推
05/13 19:28, , 25F
05/13 19:28, 25F
推
05/13 19:29, , 26F
05/13 19:29, 26F
推
05/13 19:29, , 27F
05/13 19:29, 27F
→
05/13 19:29, , 28F
05/13 19:29, 28F
→
05/13 19:29, , 29F
05/13 19:29, 29F
推
05/13 19:30, , 30F
05/13 19:30, 30F
→
05/13 19:30, , 31F
05/13 19:30, 31F
→
05/13 19:30, , 32F
05/13 19:30, 32F
推
05/13 19:30, , 33F
05/13 19:30, 33F
推
05/13 19:30, , 34F
05/13 19:30, 34F
噓
05/13 19:31, , 35F
05/13 19:31, 35F
→
05/13 19:32, , 36F
05/13 19:32, 36F
推
05/13 19:33, , 37F
05/13 19:33, 37F
→
05/13 19:33, , 38F
05/13 19:33, 38F
→
05/13 19:33, , 39F
05/13 19:33, 39F
→
05/13 19:33, , 40F
05/13 19:33, 40F
→
05/13 19:34, , 41F
05/13 19:34, 41F
→
05/13 19:35, , 42F
05/13 19:35, 42F
推
05/13 19:35, , 43F
05/13 19:35, 43F
推
05/13 19:35, , 44F
05/13 19:35, 44F
推
05/13 19:39, , 45F
05/13 19:39, 45F
噓
05/13 19:43, , 46F
05/13 19:43, 46F
推
05/13 19:44, , 47F
05/13 19:44, 47F
→
05/13 19:45, , 48F
05/13 19:45, 48F
推
05/13 19:48, , 49F
05/13 19:48, 49F
推
05/13 19:54, , 50F
05/13 19:54, 50F
推
05/13 20:13, , 51F
05/13 20:13, 51F
推
05/13 20:18, , 52F
05/13 20:18, 52F
噓
05/13 20:23, , 53F
05/13 20:23, 53F
→
05/13 20:26, , 54F
05/13 20:26, 54F
→
05/13 20:45, , 55F
05/13 20:45, 55F
推
05/13 21:11, , 56F
05/13 21:11, 56F
→
05/13 21:11, , 57F
05/13 21:11, 57F
推
05/13 21:26, , 58F
05/13 21:26, 58F
推
05/13 21:34, , 59F
05/13 21:34, 59F
推
05/13 21:48, , 60F
05/13 21:48, 60F
推
05/13 21:56, , 61F
05/13 21:56, 61F
推
05/13 22:20, , 62F
05/13 22:20, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):