[討論] 西武球團到底可以忍受李振昌多久?已回收
今天CC Lee不意外的又再度被打爆,這樣的內容完全不到日職一軍該有的水準
教練團已經放棄了郭俊麟,李的內容也沒有比郭來得出色
老實來講,郭俊麟後援表現還比李好
李振昌武器就只有速球,可是他的速球對日職打者完全沒有威脅性,或許他的球也壓制不
住中職打者
沒有變化球,也沒有控球,這樣的內容難怪有人會稱他台灣發球機2號
當初李風光的加入西武獅,教練團也期許他可以接下守護神
現在的表現不僅打臉了台灣球迷,西武教練團和高層應該也吐血
西武還可以忍受他到底多久?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 106.1.225.157
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1462976805.A.B3D.html
→
05/11 22:27, , 1F
05/11 22:27, 1F
→
05/11 22:27, , 2F
05/11 22:27, 2F
推
05/11 22:28, , 3F
05/11 22:28, 3F
推
05/11 22:28, , 4F
05/11 22:28, 4F
推
05/11 22:28, , 5F
05/11 22:28, 5F
推
05/11 22:29, , 6F
05/11 22:29, 6F
噓
05/11 22:31, , 7F
05/11 22:31, 7F
→
05/11 22:31, , 8F
05/11 22:31, 8F
→
05/11 22:32, , 9F
05/11 22:32, 9F
推
05/11 22:33, , 10F
05/11 22:33, 10F
推
05/11 22:34, , 11F
05/11 22:34, 11F
→
05/11 22:34, , 12F
05/11 22:34, 12F
推
05/11 22:34, , 13F
05/11 22:34, 13F
推
05/11 22:36, , 14F
05/11 22:36, 14F
推
05/11 22:37, , 15F
05/11 22:37, 15F
→
05/11 22:37, , 16F
05/11 22:37, 16F
→
05/11 22:38, , 17F
05/11 22:38, 17F
→
05/11 22:38, , 18F
05/11 22:38, 18F
→
05/11 22:39, , 19F
05/11 22:39, 19F
推
05/11 22:42, , 20F
05/11 22:42, 20F
→
05/11 22:49, , 21F
05/11 22:49, 21F
推
05/11 22:50, , 22F
05/11 22:50, 22F
推
05/11 22:51, , 23F
05/11 22:51, 23F
→
05/11 22:51, , 24F
05/11 22:51, 24F
→
05/11 22:51, , 25F
05/11 22:51, 25F
→
05/11 22:52, , 26F
05/11 22:52, 26F
→
05/11 22:52, , 27F
05/11 22:52, 27F
→
05/11 22:52, , 28F
05/11 22:52, 28F
→
05/11 22:52, , 29F
05/11 22:52, 29F
→
05/11 22:52, , 30F
05/11 22:52, 30F
→
05/11 22:52, , 31F
05/11 22:52, 31F
→
05/11 22:53, , 32F
05/11 22:53, 32F
推
05/11 22:54, , 33F
05/11 22:54, 33F
推
05/11 22:54, , 34F
05/11 22:54, 34F
推
05/11 22:54, , 35F
05/11 22:54, 35F
→
05/11 22:55, , 36F
05/11 22:55, 36F
→
05/11 22:56, , 37F
05/11 22:56, 37F
推
05/11 22:57, , 38F
05/11 22:57, 38F
→
05/11 22:57, , 39F
05/11 22:57, 39F
推
05/11 22:58, , 40F
05/11 22:58, 40F
→
05/11 22:58, , 41F
05/11 22:58, 41F
→
05/11 22:58, , 42F
05/11 22:58, 42F
→
05/11 23:03, , 43F
05/11 23:03, 43F
→
05/11 23:04, , 44F
05/11 23:04, 44F
→
05/11 23:04, , 45F
05/11 23:04, 45F
→
05/11 23:05, , 46F
05/11 23:05, 46F
→
05/11 23:05, , 47F
05/11 23:05, 47F
→
05/11 23:06, , 48F
05/11 23:06, 48F
推
05/11 23:07, , 49F
05/11 23:07, 49F
→
05/11 23:07, , 50F
05/11 23:07, 50F
→
05/11 23:18, , 51F
05/11 23:18, 51F
推
05/11 23:25, , 52F
05/11 23:25, 52F
推
05/11 23:30, , 53F
05/11 23:30, 53F
推
05/11 23:40, , 54F
05/11 23:40, 54F
推
05/12 00:10, , 55F
05/12 00:10, 55F
推
05/12 00:27, , 56F
05/12 00:27, 56F
推
05/12 01:14, , 57F
05/12 01:14, 57F
→
05/12 01:15, , 58F
05/12 01:15, 58F
推
05/12 08:55, , 59F
05/12 08:55, 59F
→
05/12 08:55, , 60F
05/12 08:55, 60F
→
05/12 08:55, , 61F
05/12 08:55, 61F
→
05/12 08:55, , 62F
05/12 08:55, 62F
→
05/12 08:56, , 63F
05/12 08:56, 63F
→
05/12 08:56, , 64F
05/12 08:56, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):