Re: [新聞] 張志豪明拚新紀錄 對手又是犀牛已回收
很多然還是沒有搞清楚狀況 當然啦 有些人是藏在推文裡面帶風向
志豪被保送會被酸?? 葉總不會四個打席都用投到太平洋的方式去保送他啦
葉總自己就說了 兩個打者等級不一樣,而且志豪後面更恐怖
如過志豪真的選到保送,大家會說 志豪為了紀錄 應該不要等保送的
蔣砲很多人不滿意的原因在於 蔣砲要創造的是聯盟紀錄
但是葉總把球隊單場勝負 看的比 聯盟紀錄還重要,
投手把球都投到太平洋去了,如果是投邊角的壞球,大家還不會那麼在意
如果說 今天是點總、鋸砲總當兄弟總教;花花前四個打擊都上壘
然後這位點總、鋸砲總 說為了球隊勝利 所以讓志豪連四個打席都點下去
讓志豪[沒有機會]創造連續安打的聯盟紀錄,大家一樣罵翻天啦
※ 引述《sinon2mayday (公館金城武)》之銘言:
: 沒想到昨天平紀錄炸彈又丟回葉總了
: 還是這樣說啦 那天蔣後面沒人保護他 我想會閃他的不只是義大
: 不過要討論蘇緯達狀況好就討論不完了
: 問題是牽制失誤 就算BB蘇 下一棒也有安打機會
: 不過昨天的狀況張志豪有球打 所以繼續檢討義大
: 但看新聞明天大師兄回歸
: 張志豪後面是周思齊 林智勝 蔣智賢
: 不覺得說張志豪會沒球打很沒道理嗎?
: 老實說被破了也沒甚麼
: 但記錄延續自己的球迷會爽一下 終止紀錄另外一隊球迷也會爽一下
: 張志豪也說那天義大是正常比賽了
: 蔣智賢跟陳凱倫賽後的互動也很正常
: 有時候是球迷自己過不去阿
: 所以我在這裡問一下
: 如果明天張志豪破紀錄 黑到發亮的葉總會白一點嗎?
: 我個人是覺得不會啦
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.243.113.40
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1462162912.A.3AE.html
推
05/02 12:23, , 1F
05/02 12:23, 1F
→
05/02 12:23, , 2F
05/02 12:23, 2F
推
05/02 12:24, , 3F
05/02 12:24, 3F
→
05/02 12:24, , 4F
05/02 12:24, 4F
推
05/02 12:24, , 5F
05/02 12:24, 5F
→
05/02 12:25, , 6F
05/02 12:25, 6F
推
05/02 12:26, , 7F
05/02 12:26, 7F
→
05/02 12:26, , 8F
05/02 12:26, 8F
推
05/02 12:26, , 9F
05/02 12:26, 9F
→
05/02 12:26, , 10F
05/02 12:26, 10F
→
05/02 12:26, , 11F
05/02 12:26, 11F
推
05/02 12:26, , 12F
05/02 12:26, 12F
噓
05/02 12:27, , 13F
05/02 12:27, 13F
噓
05/02 12:27, , 14F
05/02 12:27, 14F
推
05/02 12:27, , 15F
05/02 12:27, 15F
→
05/02 12:27, , 16F
05/02 12:27, 16F
推
05/02 12:28, , 17F
05/02 12:28, 17F
噓
05/02 12:29, , 18F
05/02 12:29, 18F
推
05/02 12:30, , 19F
05/02 12:30, 19F
噓
05/02 12:33, , 20F
05/02 12:33, 20F
→
05/02 12:35, , 21F
05/02 12:35, 21F
噓
05/02 12:35, , 22F
05/02 12:35, 22F
→
05/02 12:36, , 23F
05/02 12:36, 23F
→
05/02 12:36, , 24F
05/02 12:36, 24F
推
05/02 12:38, , 25F
05/02 12:38, 25F
→
05/02 12:39, , 26F
05/02 12:39, 26F
→
05/02 12:39, , 27F
05/02 12:39, 27F
→
05/02 12:43, , 28F
05/02 12:43, 28F
推
05/02 12:44, , 29F
05/02 12:44, 29F
推
05/02 12:46, , 30F
05/02 12:46, 30F
→
05/02 12:46, , 31F
05/02 12:46, 31F
推
05/02 12:46, , 32F
05/02 12:46, 32F
噓
05/02 12:49, , 33F
05/02 12:49, 33F
噓
05/02 12:51, , 34F
05/02 12:51, 34F
推
05/02 12:57, , 35F
05/02 12:57, 35F
推
05/02 12:59, , 36F
05/02 12:59, 36F
推
05/02 12:59, , 37F
05/02 12:59, 37F
→
05/02 12:59, , 38F
05/02 12:59, 38F
→
05/02 13:00, , 39F
05/02 13:00, 39F
→
05/02 13:00, , 40F
05/02 13:00, 40F
推
05/02 13:01, , 41F
05/02 13:01, 41F
推
05/02 13:05, , 42F
05/02 13:05, 42F
噓
05/02 13:05, , 43F
05/02 13:05, 43F
推
05/02 13:06, , 44F
05/02 13:06, 44F
推
05/02 13:08, , 45F
05/02 13:08, 45F
→
05/02 13:08, , 46F
05/02 13:08, 46F
噓
05/02 13:10, , 47F
05/02 13:10, 47F
→
05/02 13:10, , 48F
05/02 13:10, 48F
→
05/02 13:10, , 49F
05/02 13:10, 49F
推
05/02 13:11, , 50F
05/02 13:11, 50F
→
05/02 13:12, , 51F
05/02 13:12, 51F
→
05/02 13:16, , 52F
05/02 13:16, 52F
→
05/02 13:16, , 53F
05/02 13:16, 53F
推
05/02 13:21, , 54F
05/02 13:21, 54F
推
05/02 13:21, , 55F
05/02 13:21, 55F
→
05/02 13:21, , 56F
05/02 13:21, 56F
推
05/02 13:22, , 57F
05/02 13:22, 57F
→
05/02 13:30, , 58F
05/02 13:30, 58F
→
05/02 13:31, , 59F
05/02 13:31, 59F
推
05/02 13:40, , 60F
05/02 13:40, 60F
推
05/02 13:41, , 61F
05/02 13:41, 61F
推
05/02 13:42, , 62F
05/02 13:42, 62F
推
05/02 13:44, , 63F
05/02 13:44, 63F
噓
05/02 13:58, , 64F
05/02 13:58, 64F
→
05/02 13:58, , 65F
05/02 13:58, 65F
噓
05/02 14:02, , 66F
05/02 14:02, 66F
推
05/02 14:05, , 67F
05/02 14:05, 67F
噓
05/02 14:11, , 68F
05/02 14:11, 68F
→
05/02 14:11, , 69F
05/02 14:11, 69F
推
05/02 14:19, , 70F
05/02 14:19, 70F
推
05/02 14:22, , 71F
05/02 14:22, 71F
→
05/02 14:22, , 72F
05/02 14:22, 72F
推
05/02 14:24, , 73F
05/02 14:24, 73F
→
05/02 14:24, , 74F
05/02 14:24, 74F
推
05/02 14:26, , 75F
05/02 14:26, 75F
→
05/02 14:26, , 76F
05/02 14:26, 76F
噓
05/02 15:38, , 77F
05/02 15:38, 77F
→
05/02 15:38, , 78F
05/02 15:38, 78F
噓
05/02 15:43, , 79F
05/02 15:43, 79F
→
05/02 15:44, , 80F
05/02 15:44, 80F
→
05/02 15:54, , 81F
05/02 15:54, 81F
推
05/02 15:59, , 82F
05/02 15:59, 82F
推
05/02 16:14, , 83F
05/02 16:14, 83F
→
05/02 16:15, , 84F
05/02 16:15, 84F
→
05/02 16:19, , 85F
05/02 16:19, 85F
推
05/02 17:30, , 86F
05/02 17:30, 86F
→
05/02 18:16, , 87F
05/02 18:16, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)