Re: [討論] 蘇泰安又想請洋投了消失
其實統一最大的問題是
每個位置都有不錯的人選
但就僅限於"不錯"而已
所以才會有就算找洋砲
也不知道要找哪個位置的錯覺
一壘? 國慶買嘉儀小鄧鄧
三人都不差 但就一壘手來說打擊都不夠好
二壘? 志祥雖然不像大師兄是重砲
但攻守平均來說在中線算是表現不錯了
三壘? 不可能找洋砲來讓基哥坐板凳
雖然他今年到目前為止打擊狀況極差
游擊? 郭Rod今年表現也不錯也有長打
找洋砲來讓他失去上場機會也不明智
外野?CF洋砲不好找 唐帥狀況也不錯
狀況差時也有羅國龍可以輪替
角落外野有武神,小破,跟需要上場機會的鍇文
總之就是每個位置看似都有不錯的人選了
但實際上除了武神以外都不是不能取代的
假設把打者等級分為1~10分
義大跟統一剛好就是不平均跟平均的兩個極端
如果義大是 4個10分+5個3分 組成
統一大概就是 9個5分 的打者
看似沒有很弱的棒次 但根本沒什麼威脅力
也難怪連個中心打線都排不太出來
當年3連霸的無差別打線
靠的就是每棒都是7~8分的實力
現在過了幾年 老了退化了受傷了
全部變成平均左右的打者
也難怪打線會變成4隊最差
其實我覺得統一找洋砲也沒什麼用了啦
除非能找個至少布雷等級的
不然就算加個洋砲
也只是讓比賽精采度增加而已
要比打擊戰還是玩不過象猿
說不定逆向思考 市場區隔
找個厲害的洋SP+原有的JJJ跟布魯斯
把先發輪值弄強一點 減輕牛棚負擔
改玩低比分的比賽
說不定戰績還比較有機會好一點
反正再怎麼慘頂多就像去年那樣了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.97.38
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1459230161.A.3E3.html
推
03/29 13:44, , 1F
03/29 13:44, 1F
→
03/29 13:46, , 2F
03/29 13:46, 2F
推
03/29 13:46, , 3F
03/29 13:46, 3F
→
03/29 13:46, , 4F
03/29 13:46, 4F
→
03/29 13:47, , 5F
03/29 13:47, 5F
→
03/29 13:48, , 6F
03/29 13:48, 6F
推
03/29 13:49, , 7F
03/29 13:49, 7F
→
03/29 13:49, , 8F
03/29 13:49, 8F
推
03/29 13:49, , 9F
03/29 13:49, 9F
推
03/29 13:50, , 10F
03/29 13:50, 10F
推
03/29 13:52, , 11F
03/29 13:52, 11F
→
03/29 13:52, , 12F
03/29 13:52, 12F
→
03/29 13:52, , 13F
03/29 13:52, 13F
推
03/29 13:53, , 14F
03/29 13:53, 14F
推
03/29 13:55, , 15F
03/29 13:55, 15F
推
03/29 13:56, , 16F
03/29 13:56, 16F
→
03/29 13:56, , 17F
03/29 13:56, 17F
推
03/29 13:57, , 18F
03/29 13:57, 18F
推
03/29 13:57, , 19F
03/29 13:57, 19F
→
03/29 13:58, , 20F
03/29 13:58, 20F
推
03/29 13:58, , 21F
03/29 13:58, 21F
推
03/29 14:00, , 22F
03/29 14:00, 22F
推
03/29 14:03, , 23F
03/29 14:03, 23F
→
03/29 14:03, , 24F
03/29 14:03, 24F
推
03/29 14:03, , 25F
03/29 14:03, 25F
推
03/29 14:03, , 26F
03/29 14:03, 26F
→
03/29 14:04, , 27F
03/29 14:04, 27F
→
03/29 14:04, , 28F
03/29 14:04, 28F
→
03/29 14:04, , 29F
03/29 14:04, 29F
推
03/29 14:05, , 30F
03/29 14:05, 30F
推
03/29 14:06, , 31F
03/29 14:06, 31F
→
03/29 14:06, , 32F
03/29 14:06, 32F
推
03/29 14:09, , 33F
03/29 14:09, 33F
推
03/29 14:09, , 34F
03/29 14:09, 34F
推
03/29 14:09, , 35F
03/29 14:09, 35F
→
03/29 14:11, , 36F
03/29 14:11, 36F
→
03/29 14:11, , 37F
03/29 14:11, 37F
推
03/29 14:13, , 38F
03/29 14:13, 38F
推
03/29 14:14, , 39F
03/29 14:14, 39F
推
03/29 14:14, , 40F
03/29 14:14, 40F
推
03/29 14:15, , 41F
03/29 14:15, 41F
推
03/29 14:26, , 42F
03/29 14:26, 42F
推
03/29 14:32, , 43F
03/29 14:32, 43F
推
03/29 14:50, , 44F
03/29 14:50, 44F
→
03/29 14:50, , 45F
03/29 14:50, 45F
推
03/29 15:01, , 46F
03/29 15:01, 46F
→
03/29 15:02, , 47F
03/29 15:02, 47F
噓
03/29 15:31, , 48F
03/29 15:31, 48F
推
03/29 15:31, , 49F
03/29 15:31, 49F
推
03/29 15:32, , 50F
03/29 15:32, 50F
推
03/29 15:40, , 51F
03/29 15:40, 51F
推
03/29 15:44, , 52F
03/29 15:44, 52F
→
03/29 15:44, , 53F
03/29 15:44, 53F
→
03/29 15:46, , 54F
03/29 15:46, 54F
推
03/29 15:57, , 55F
03/29 15:57, 55F
推
03/29 16:06, , 56F
03/29 16:06, 56F
→
03/29 16:06, , 57F
03/29 16:06, 57F
推
03/29 16:10, , 58F
03/29 16:10, 58F
推
03/29 16:10, , 59F
03/29 16:10, 59F
推
03/29 17:43, , 60F
03/29 17:43, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)