Re: [討論] 如果吳俊良真的被換掉?消失
"選秀一定是先選強打者,後面再撿剩的投手"
"選投手根本沒用,除了嘟嘟哪個投手撐得久?"
"好的打者不用管位置有沒有重疊,先選就對了"
"寧可多選打者,也不要資敵"
這種觀念其實也不能說不對
只要有很強的打線+3個外掛洋投很容易拿冠軍
所以紅中也如大家所願
在打者比投手強的情況下
還是選了大王跟承飛
反正有強打者先選再說
結果投手連續爆炸兩場後球迷開始想換投教?
如果像統一這種情況
特別用前兩輪選了子崴跟宋家豪
子崴球速變慢可以說教練沒幫他調整好
宋家豪沒簽下來可以怪領隊談約能力不足
那怪教練跟領隊還比較有道理
但Lamigo根本也沒補進什麼好投手啊
已經照鄉民的意見選進一堆砲手了
本來就是要承擔投手爆炸的風險
結果選秀的時候補進打者爽的要命
投手被打爆再來叫投手教練下台
換誰其實都差不多啦
難不成真的以為換好的教練就能把5~7輪選進的投手調教成王牌?
攻守不均衡對球隊長期來說也不是什麼好事
不過也不太需要抱怨牛棚放火
反正去年每場都放火也拿到冠軍了
就算投手場場掉10分
只要再多補進幾個重砲手每場打個15分
就會贏球了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.53.123
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1458813407.A.043.html
推
03/24 17:58, , 1F
03/24 17:58, 1F
→
03/24 17:59, , 2F
03/24 17:59, 2F
→
03/24 18:00, , 3F
03/24 18:00, 3F
推
03/24 18:00, , 4F
03/24 18:00, 4F
推
03/24 18:01, , 5F
03/24 18:01, 5F
推
03/24 18:02, , 6F
03/24 18:02, 6F
→
03/24 18:03, , 7F
03/24 18:03, 7F
推
03/24 18:03, , 8F
03/24 18:03, 8F
→
03/24 18:03, , 9F
03/24 18:03, 9F
→
03/24 18:03, , 10F
03/24 18:03, 10F
→
03/24 18:04, , 11F
03/24 18:04, 11F
→
03/24 18:04, , 12F
03/24 18:04, 12F
推
03/24 18:05, , 13F
03/24 18:05, 13F
→
03/24 18:05, , 14F
03/24 18:05, 14F
→
03/24 18:05, , 15F
03/24 18:05, 15F
→
03/24 18:05, , 16F
03/24 18:05, 16F
推
03/24 18:05, , 17F
03/24 18:05, 17F
→
03/24 18:05, , 18F
03/24 18:05, 18F
→
03/24 18:06, , 19F
03/24 18:06, 19F
→
03/24 18:06, , 20F
03/24 18:06, 20F
→
03/24 18:06, , 21F
03/24 18:06, 21F
→
03/24 18:06, , 22F
03/24 18:06, 22F
→
03/24 18:06, , 23F
03/24 18:06, 23F
→
03/24 18:09, , 24F
03/24 18:09, 24F
噓
03/24 18:10, , 25F
03/24 18:10, 25F
推
03/24 18:10, , 26F
03/24 18:10, 26F
推
03/24 18:11, , 27F
03/24 18:11, 27F
→
03/24 18:11, , 28F
03/24 18:11, 28F
→
03/24 18:12, , 29F
03/24 18:12, 29F
→
03/24 18:12, , 30F
03/24 18:12, 30F
→
03/24 18:12, , 31F
03/24 18:12, 31F
推
03/24 18:13, , 32F
03/24 18:13, 32F
噓
03/24 18:13, , 33F
03/24 18:13, 33F
→
03/24 18:13, , 34F
03/24 18:13, 34F
推
03/24 18:13, , 35F
03/24 18:13, 35F
推
03/24 18:14, , 36F
03/24 18:14, 36F
→
03/24 18:14, , 37F
03/24 18:14, 37F
推
03/24 18:14, , 38F
03/24 18:14, 38F
推
03/24 18:15, , 39F
03/24 18:15, 39F
還有 50 則推文
推
03/24 18:28, , 90F
03/24 18:28, 90F
推
03/24 18:28, , 91F
03/24 18:28, 91F
→
03/24 18:28, , 92F
03/24 18:28, 92F
推
03/24 18:29, , 93F
03/24 18:29, 93F
→
03/24 18:29, , 94F
03/24 18:29, 94F
推
03/24 18:29, , 95F
03/24 18:29, 95F
推
03/24 18:30, , 96F
03/24 18:30, 96F
推
03/24 18:31, , 97F
03/24 18:31, 97F
→
03/24 18:31, , 98F
03/24 18:31, 98F
推
03/24 18:31, , 99F
03/24 18:31, 99F
→
03/24 18:31, , 100F
03/24 18:31, 100F
推
03/24 18:32, , 101F
03/24 18:32, 101F
推
03/24 18:32, , 102F
03/24 18:32, 102F
→
03/24 18:32, , 103F
03/24 18:32, 103F
→
03/24 18:32, , 104F
03/24 18:32, 104F
推
03/24 18:32, , 105F
03/24 18:32, 105F
→
03/24 18:33, , 106F
03/24 18:33, 106F
→
03/24 18:33, , 107F
03/24 18:33, 107F
→
03/24 18:33, , 108F
03/24 18:33, 108F
→
03/24 18:33, , 109F
03/24 18:33, 109F
→
03/24 18:34, , 110F
03/24 18:34, 110F
噓
03/24 18:34, , 111F
03/24 18:34, 111F
→
03/24 18:34, , 112F
03/24 18:34, 112F
推
03/24 18:35, , 113F
03/24 18:35, 113F
→
03/24 18:36, , 114F
03/24 18:36, 114F
推
03/24 18:36, , 115F
03/24 18:36, 115F
→
03/24 18:37, , 116F
03/24 18:37, 116F
→
03/24 18:37, , 117F
03/24 18:37, 117F
→
03/24 18:37, , 118F
03/24 18:37, 118F
推
03/24 18:38, , 119F
03/24 18:38, 119F
→
03/24 18:39, , 120F
03/24 18:39, 120F
噓
03/24 18:41, , 121F
03/24 18:41, 121F
推
03/24 18:47, , 122F
03/24 18:47, 122F
→
03/24 18:50, , 123F
03/24 18:50, 123F
→
03/24 18:50, , 124F
03/24 18:50, 124F
推
03/24 19:05, , 125F
03/24 19:05, 125F
推
03/24 19:16, , 126F
03/24 19:16, 126F
推
03/24 19:25, , 127F
03/24 19:25, 127F
噓
03/24 19:27, , 128F
03/24 19:27, 128F
→
03/24 19:27, , 129F
03/24 19:27, 129F
討論串 (同標題文章)