Re: [新聞] 鋒砲最感謝的劉董 回想2006年緣起時消失
以下幾個心得
1.時代在進步,球員薪水也在漲,
這種小型企業又要照顧球迷又要照顧球員負擔當然會比較大
也許撐不下去,還是有可能賣掉 (除非突然挖到石油)
2.職棒如果搞了這麼多年都只有虧本經營,
我相信任何球團都不會樂見。(除非真的佛心來的)
3.球團開銷真的很大,但這應該在經營球團前就可以想見的事情
既然經營下去了,還來講這些事情,會令人反感。
4.但LAMIGO是去年最賺的球團,這時候出來喊窮實在不是時機點。
連最賺錢的球團都喊窮了,哪有新球隊敢加入
5.Lamigo現在最為人詬病的地方就是形象問題,
你喊窮當然可以,但是冰鋒哥+亂操投手+內部派系亂七八糟
還把小飛機貓仔等人釋出,會讓人有要錢不要臉的感覺
6.不能說有請啦啦隊就是失去本質,
但選手養成上面真的沒有認真,這才是失去本質
7.但這球團至少球場經營的還不錯,現代人就是去球場放鬆,
至少LAMIGO球場還是適合全家同樂的地方 (沈玉琳可以不要來了...)。
8.不知道明年鋒哥退休後,老球迷是不是真的會跑走?
9.真希望洪一中可以少講一點話。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 120.114.2.104
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1457656276.A.DE2.html
※ 編輯: hong1126 (120.114.2.104), 03/11/2016 08:34:16
→
03/11 08:33, , 1F
03/11 08:33, 1F
→
03/11 08:34, , 2F
03/11 08:34, 2F
→
03/11 08:34, , 3F
03/11 08:34, 3F
→
03/11 08:35, , 4F
03/11 08:35, 4F
噓
03/11 08:37, , 5F
03/11 08:37, 5F
→
03/11 08:38, , 6F
03/11 08:38, 6F
噓
03/11 08:38, , 7F
03/11 08:38, 7F
→
03/11 08:39, , 8F
03/11 08:39, 8F
→
03/11 08:40, , 9F
03/11 08:40, 9F
→
03/11 08:40, , 10F
03/11 08:40, 10F
→
03/11 08:40, , 11F
03/11 08:40, 11F
→
03/11 08:41, , 12F
03/11 08:41, 12F
→
03/11 08:41, , 13F
03/11 08:41, 13F
→
03/11 08:42, , 14F
03/11 08:42, 14F
→
03/11 08:42, , 15F
03/11 08:42, 15F
推
03/11 08:44, , 16F
03/11 08:44, 16F
→
03/11 08:44, , 17F
03/11 08:44, 17F
噓
03/11 08:44, , 18F
03/11 08:44, 18F
國文教學
喊窮時機不對 不代表不可以喊窮 鳩咪>.V
※ 編輯: hong1126 (120.114.2.104), 03/11/2016 08:46:57
噓
03/11 08:47, , 19F
03/11 08:47, 19F
噓
03/11 08:51, , 20F
03/11 08:51, 20F
→
03/11 08:51, , 21F
03/11 08:51, 21F
推
03/11 08:52, , 22F
03/11 08:52, 22F
噓
03/11 08:53, , 23F
03/11 08:53, 23F
推
03/11 08:58, , 24F
03/11 08:58, 24F
推
03/11 08:59, , 25F
03/11 08:59, 25F
→
03/11 09:00, , 26F
03/11 09:00, 26F
噓
03/11 09:01, , 27F
03/11 09:01, 27F
推
03/11 09:11, , 28F
03/11 09:11, 28F
→
03/11 09:13, , 29F
03/11 09:13, 29F
推
03/11 09:14, , 30F
03/11 09:14, 30F
推
03/11 09:15, , 31F
03/11 09:15, 31F
→
03/11 09:15, , 32F
03/11 09:15, 32F
→
03/11 09:16, , 33F
03/11 09:16, 33F
噓
03/11 09:17, , 34F
03/11 09:17, 34F
→
03/11 09:18, , 35F
03/11 09:18, 35F
→
03/11 09:19, , 36F
03/11 09:19, 36F
推
03/11 09:19, , 37F
03/11 09:19, 37F
→
03/11 09:21, , 38F
03/11 09:21, 38F
→
03/11 09:21, , 39F
03/11 09:21, 39F
→
03/11 09:22, , 40F
03/11 09:22, 40F
→
03/11 09:22, , 41F
03/11 09:22, 41F
噓
03/11 09:23, , 42F
03/11 09:23, 42F
推
03/11 09:23, , 43F
03/11 09:23, 43F
→
03/11 09:23, , 44F
03/11 09:23, 44F
噓
03/11 09:24, , 45F
03/11 09:24, 45F
噓
03/11 09:24, , 46F
03/11 09:24, 46F
→
03/11 09:24, , 47F
03/11 09:24, 47F
→
03/11 09:24, , 48F
03/11 09:24, 48F
→
03/11 09:25, , 49F
03/11 09:25, 49F
噓
03/11 09:25, , 50F
03/11 09:25, 50F
→
03/11 09:26, , 51F
03/11 09:26, 51F
→
03/11 09:27, , 52F
03/11 09:27, 52F
推
03/11 09:28, , 53F
03/11 09:28, 53F
→
03/11 09:29, , 54F
03/11 09:29, 54F
噓
03/11 09:37, , 55F
03/11 09:37, 55F
→
03/11 09:38, , 56F
03/11 09:38, 56F
推
03/11 09:45, , 57F
03/11 09:45, 57F
噓
03/11 09:46, , 58F
03/11 09:46, 58F
推
03/11 09:58, , 59F
03/11 09:58, 59F
→
03/11 09:58, , 60F
03/11 09:58, 60F
推
03/11 10:16, , 61F
03/11 10:16, 61F
→
03/11 10:16, , 62F
03/11 10:16, 62F
→
03/11 10:17, , 63F
03/11 10:17, 63F
推
03/11 10:21, , 64F
03/11 10:21, 64F
推
03/11 10:24, , 65F
03/11 10:24, 65F
推
03/11 10:26, , 66F
03/11 10:26, 66F
→
03/11 10:26, , 67F
03/11 10:26, 67F
推
03/11 10:28, , 68F
03/11 10:28, 68F
→
03/11 10:28, , 69F
03/11 10:28, 69F
推
03/11 10:51, , 70F
03/11 10:51, 70F
→
03/11 12:32, , 71F
03/11 12:32, 71F
→
03/11 12:33, , 72F
03/11 12:33, 72F
→
03/11 12:34, , 73F
03/11 12:34, 73F
推
03/11 13:43, , 74F
03/11 13:43, 74F
→
03/11 13:44, , 75F
03/11 13:44, 75F
推
03/11 14:12, , 76F
03/11 14:12, 76F
推
03/11 14:13, , 77F
03/11 14:13, 77F
→
03/11 14:15, , 78F
03/11 14:15, 78F
→
03/11 14:18, , 79F
03/11 14:18, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):