[討論] 西武王朝時期的郭泰源是王牌投手嗎?消失
因為年紀關係只聽過西武時期 沒親眼看過轉播跟當時新聞
想請問 現在中華隊總教練郭泰源 在被評日本史上最強外援的封號
那個時期的西武 很多王牌:郭泰源 工藤公康 渡邊久信 渡邊智男 石井丈裕 新谷博
這些眾星雲集 誰是西武關鍵時期(如冠軍賽 季後賽)一定會先派的(王牌)投手
那個時期的郭泰源地位相當於現在的金子千尋嗎?還是相當於現在日職的誰?
請資深球迷分享一下謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.11.230.232
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1443779053.A.77D.html
推
10/02 17:45, , 1F
10/02 17:45, 1F
→
10/02 17:46, , 2F
10/02 17:46, 2F
推
10/02 17:47, , 3F
10/02 17:47, 3F
推
10/02 17:48, , 4F
10/02 17:48, 4F
→
10/02 17:48, , 5F
10/02 17:48, 5F
推
10/02 17:48, , 6F
10/02 17:48, 6F
推
10/02 17:50, , 7F
10/02 17:50, 7F
推
10/02 17:50, , 8F
10/02 17:50, 8F
二三號 是因為強的卡在一起還是?? 如果郭跑到別隊有機會一號嗎
推
10/02 17:52, , 9F
10/02 17:52, 9F
推
10/02 17:57, , 10F
10/02 17:57, 10F
→
10/02 17:57, , 11F
10/02 17:57, 11F
推
10/02 17:57, , 12F
10/02 17:57, 12F
※ 編輯: cjo4fu31219 (124.11.230.232), 10/02/2015 17:58:47
推
10/02 17:58, , 13F
10/02 17:58, 13F
→
10/02 17:58, , 14F
10/02 17:58, 14F
→
10/02 18:01, , 15F
10/02 18:01, 15F
→
10/02 18:02, , 16F
10/02 18:02, 16F
推
10/02 18:09, , 17F
10/02 18:09, 17F
→
10/02 18:09, , 18F
10/02 18:09, 18F
推
10/02 18:09, , 19F
10/02 18:09, 19F
推
10/02 18:11, , 20F
10/02 18:11, 20F
噓
10/02 18:15, , 21F
10/02 18:15, 21F
推
10/02 18:20, , 22F
10/02 18:20, 22F
→
10/02 18:20, , 23F
10/02 18:20, 23F
→
10/02 18:21, , 24F
10/02 18:21, 24F
→
10/02 18:21, , 25F
10/02 18:21, 25F
→
10/02 18:21, , 26F
10/02 18:21, 26F
推
10/02 18:24, , 27F
10/02 18:24, 27F
推
10/02 18:39, , 28F
10/02 18:39, 28F
推
10/02 18:42, , 29F
10/02 18:42, 29F
推
10/02 18:44, , 30F
10/02 18:44, 30F
推
10/02 18:51, , 31F
10/02 18:51, 31F
→
10/02 18:52, , 32F
10/02 18:52, 32F
推
10/02 18:59, , 33F
10/02 18:59, 33F
噓
10/02 19:00, , 34F
10/02 19:00, 34F
推
10/02 19:07, , 35F
10/02 19:07, 35F
推
10/02 19:14, , 36F
10/02 19:14, 36F
推
10/02 19:42, , 37F
10/02 19:42, 37F
推
10/02 19:52, , 38F
10/02 19:52, 38F
推
10/02 20:00, , 39F
10/02 20:00, 39F
→
10/02 20:00, , 40F
10/02 20:00, 40F
推
10/02 21:02, , 41F
10/02 21:02, 41F
→
10/02 21:02, , 42F
10/02 21:02, 42F
→
10/02 21:54, , 43F
10/02 21:54, 43F
推
10/02 22:38, , 44F
10/02 22:38, 44F
→
10/02 22:39, , 45F
10/02 22:39, 45F
→
10/02 23:47, , 46F
10/02 23:47, 46F
→
10/02 23:48, , 47F
10/02 23:48, 47F
推
10/03 01:49, , 48F
10/03 01:49, 48F
推
10/03 10:11, , 49F
10/03 10:11, 49F
→
10/03 10:11, , 50F
10/03 10:11, 50F
推
10/03 19:25, , 51F
10/03 19:25, 51F
推
04/23 14:24, , 52F
04/23 14:24, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):