[問題] 打擊能力與守備位置的關聯?消失
常聽到有人說XXX打擊能力不佳,所以只能守OO位置?
以OO位置來說,XXX打擊算很好了?
我納悶很久,為什麼打擊好/不好,就適合站內/外野?
(說法或邏輯可能有誤,請見諒)
當然攻守兼備最好,但打擊與守備不是獨立的技術嗎?還是跟臂力、敏捷有關,所以影響
到適合的守備位置
懇請解惑,謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.101.167
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1441812849.A.7CB.html
推
09/09 23:35, , 1F
09/09 23:35, 1F
→
09/09 23:35, , 2F
09/09 23:35, 2F
→
09/09 23:36, , 3F
09/09 23:36, 3F
推
09/09 23:36, , 4F
09/09 23:36, 4F
推
09/09 23:36, , 5F
09/09 23:36, 5F
→
09/09 23:37, , 6F
09/09 23:37, 6F
→
09/09 23:37, , 7F
09/09 23:37, 7F
推
09/09 23:38, , 8F
09/09 23:38, 8F
→
09/09 23:39, , 9F
09/09 23:39, 9F
推
09/09 23:39, , 10F
09/09 23:39, 10F
→
09/09 23:39, , 11F
09/09 23:39, 11F
→
09/09 23:39, , 12F
09/09 23:39, 12F
→
09/09 23:39, , 13F
09/09 23:39, 13F
→
09/09 23:40, , 14F
09/09 23:40, 14F
推
09/09 23:41, , 15F
09/09 23:41, 15F
→
09/09 23:41, , 16F
09/09 23:41, 16F
推
09/09 23:43, , 17F
09/09 23:43, 17F
推
09/09 23:43, , 18F
09/09 23:43, 18F
推
09/09 23:45, , 19F
09/09 23:45, 19F
→
09/09 23:45, , 20F
09/09 23:45, 20F
推
09/09 23:47, , 21F
09/09 23:47, 21F
推
09/09 23:48, , 22F
09/09 23:48, 22F
推
09/09 23:49, , 23F
09/09 23:49, 23F
推
09/09 23:50, , 24F
09/09 23:50, 24F
推
09/09 23:50, , 25F
09/09 23:50, 25F
→
09/09 23:50, , 26F
09/09 23:50, 26F
推
09/09 23:52, , 27F
09/09 23:52, 27F
→
09/09 23:52, , 28F
09/09 23:52, 28F
推
09/09 23:52, , 29F
09/09 23:52, 29F
→
09/09 23:52, , 30F
09/09 23:52, 30F
→
09/09 23:53, , 31F
09/09 23:53, 31F
推
09/09 23:56, , 32F
09/09 23:56, 32F
推
09/09 23:56, , 33F
09/09 23:56, 33F
推
09/09 23:56, , 34F
09/09 23:56, 34F
推
09/09 23:57, , 35F
09/09 23:57, 35F
→
09/09 23:57, , 36F
09/09 23:57, 36F
推
09/09 23:57, , 37F
09/09 23:57, 37F
→
09/09 23:59, , 38F
09/09 23:59, 38F
→
09/09 23:59, , 39F
09/09 23:59, 39F
→
09/09 23:59, , 40F
09/09 23:59, 40F
推
09/09 23:59, , 41F
09/09 23:59, 41F
推
09/10 00:04, , 42F
09/10 00:04, 42F
推
09/10 00:07, , 43F
09/10 00:07, 43F
推
09/10 00:07, , 44F
09/10 00:07, 44F
→
09/10 00:08, , 45F
09/10 00:08, 45F
→
09/10 00:08, , 46F
09/10 00:08, 46F
→
09/10 00:09, , 47F
09/10 00:09, 47F
→
09/10 00:10, , 48F
09/10 00:10, 48F
推
09/10 00:14, , 49F
09/10 00:14, 49F
推
09/10 00:15, , 50F
09/10 00:15, 50F
推
09/10 00:59, , 51F
09/10 00:59, 51F
→
09/10 01:18, , 52F
09/10 01:18, 52F
→
09/10 01:31, , 53F
09/10 01:31, 53F
推
09/10 01:36, , 54F
09/10 01:36, 54F
推
09/10 01:45, , 55F
09/10 01:45, 55F
推
09/10 02:46, , 56F
09/10 02:46, 56F
推
09/10 03:08, , 57F
09/10 03:08, 57F
推
09/10 04:46, , 58F
09/10 04:46, 58F
→
09/10 07:28, , 59F
09/10 07:28, 59F
→
09/10 12:05, , 60F
09/10 12:05, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
問題
33
60