[寶寶] 身為母親,真的就適合親帶小孩嗎?已回收
手機排版請見諒。:P
幾乎每個媽媽對自己的孩子都是無盡的付出與愛,事事以小孩為主,自己永遠排在孩子後
頭。
我也是那麼愛我的孩子,可以為他們犧牲自己的生命,但是我心裡一直很疑惑,儘管我那
麼愛他們,我卻覺得我跟他們最美好的距離是『上班一整天,晚上只跟孩子相處一下子』
,我覺得我完全不適合親帶孩子完全沒有耐性,也有媽媽是這種感受嗎?
每個人甚至每個媽媽都認為帶孩子就是應該親力親為,而我看到每個媽媽也都做得很好,
彷彿這是為母的天性,可是為什麼我始終做不來呢?
為了小孩辭職在家當全職媽媽也快四年了(目前一對二),儘管我那麼愛我的孩子可是我
卻始終沒辦法控制我的情緒,對小孩的態度永遠都是非常不耐煩和煩躁,我真的很想知道
有沒有其他媽媽也是像我這樣?
是不是並不是所有『母親』都直接等同於適合親自24小時照顧自己的孩子?我真的很想知
道也有媽媽像我對孩子這麼不耐煩的嗎?我是24小時都不耐煩不是偶爾沒耐心,我很自責
,我不知道是不是自己有很嚴重的問題?還是真的就不是每個人都適合親帶孩子?
我很想知道有沒有其他媽媽像我一樣始終對孩子就是那麼不耐煩(雖然很愛他們)…是不
是我應該去看醫生了:'(
先感謝若有回覆的訊息,感謝再感謝。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.147.36.35
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/BabyMother/M.1412089968.A.441.html
推
09/30 23:16, , 1F
09/30 23:16, 1F
推
09/30 23:21, , 2F
09/30 23:21, 2F
→
09/30 23:22, , 3F
09/30 23:22, 3F
推
09/30 23:26, , 4F
09/30 23:26, 4F
→
09/30 23:26, , 5F
09/30 23:26, 5F
推
09/30 23:27, , 6F
09/30 23:27, 6F
→
09/30 23:27, , 7F
09/30 23:27, 7F
→
09/30 23:27, , 8F
09/30 23:27, 8F
推
09/30 23:31, , 9F
09/30 23:31, 9F
推
09/30 23:36, , 10F
09/30 23:36, 10F
→
09/30 23:37, , 11F
09/30 23:37, 11F
→
09/30 23:38, , 12F
09/30 23:38, 12F
→
09/30 23:39, , 13F
09/30 23:39, 13F
→
09/30 23:41, , 14F
09/30 23:41, 14F
推
09/30 23:44, , 15F
09/30 23:44, 15F
→
09/30 23:44, , 16F
09/30 23:44, 16F
推
09/30 23:44, , 17F
09/30 23:44, 17F
推
10/01 00:10, , 18F
10/01 00:10, 18F
→
10/01 00:12, , 19F
10/01 00:12, 19F
推
10/01 00:15, , 20F
10/01 00:15, 20F
→
10/01 00:15, , 21F
10/01 00:15, 21F
→
10/01 00:16, , 22F
10/01 00:16, 22F
→
10/01 00:19, , 23F
10/01 00:19, 23F
→
10/01 00:19, , 24F
10/01 00:19, 24F
推
10/01 00:20, , 25F
10/01 00:20, 25F
→
10/01 00:20, , 26F
10/01 00:20, 26F
→
10/01 00:20, , 27F
10/01 00:20, 27F
推
10/01 00:21, , 28F
10/01 00:21, 28F
→
10/01 00:21, , 29F
10/01 00:21, 29F
→
10/01 00:21, , 30F
10/01 00:21, 30F
推
10/01 00:25, , 31F
10/01 00:25, 31F
→
10/01 00:28, , 32F
10/01 00:28, 32F
推
10/01 00:45, , 33F
10/01 00:45, 33F
推
10/01 01:19, , 34F
10/01 01:19, 34F
→
10/01 01:20, , 35F
10/01 01:20, 35F
推
10/01 01:36, , 36F
10/01 01:36, 36F
→
10/01 01:36, , 37F
10/01 01:36, 37F
推
10/01 08:47, , 38F
10/01 08:47, 38F
推
10/01 09:11, , 39F
10/01 09:11, 39F
→
10/01 09:12, , 40F
10/01 09:12, 40F
→
10/01 09:12, , 41F
10/01 09:12, 41F
推
10/01 09:43, , 42F
10/01 09:43, 42F
→
10/01 09:44, , 43F
10/01 09:44, 43F
→
10/01 09:45, , 44F
10/01 09:45, 44F
推
10/01 09:52, , 45F
10/01 09:52, 45F
→
10/01 09:53, , 46F
10/01 09:53, 46F
推
10/01 09:55, , 47F
10/01 09:55, 47F
→
10/01 09:55, , 48F
10/01 09:55, 48F
→
10/01 09:56, , 49F
10/01 09:56, 49F
→
10/01 09:56, , 50F
10/01 09:56, 50F
→
10/01 09:57, , 51F
10/01 09:57, 51F
→
10/01 09:58, , 52F
10/01 09:58, 52F
推
10/01 10:24, , 53F
10/01 10:24, 53F
→
10/01 10:24, , 54F
10/01 10:24, 54F
推
10/01 10:33, , 55F
10/01 10:33, 55F
→
10/01 10:33, , 56F
10/01 10:33, 56F
推
10/01 10:44, , 57F
10/01 10:44, 57F
→
10/01 10:44, , 58F
10/01 10:44, 58F
→
10/01 10:44, , 59F
10/01 10:44, 59F
→
10/01 10:44, , 60F
10/01 10:44, 60F
→
10/01 10:44, , 61F
10/01 10:44, 61F
→
10/01 10:44, , 62F
10/01 10:44, 62F
→
10/01 10:44, , 63F
10/01 10:44, 63F
→
10/01 10:44, , 64F
10/01 10:44, 64F
推
10/01 11:29, , 65F
10/01 11:29, 65F
→
10/01 11:29, , 66F
10/01 11:29, 66F
推
10/01 13:46, , 67F
10/01 13:46, 67F
推
10/01 17:03, , 68F
10/01 17:03, 68F
→
10/01 17:03, , 69F
10/01 17:03, 69F
→
10/01 17:04, , 70F
10/01 17:04, 70F
→
10/01 17:04, , 71F
10/01 17:04, 71F
→
10/01 17:05, , 72F
10/01 17:05, 72F
→
10/01 17:06, , 73F
10/01 17:06, 73F
→
10/01 17:06, , 74F
10/01 17:06, 74F
推
10/01 17:15, , 75F
10/01 17:15, 75F
→
10/01 23:10, , 76F
10/01 23:10, 76F
→
10/01 23:10, , 77F
10/01 23:10, 77F
→
10/01 23:10, , 78F
10/01 23:10, 78F
→
10/01 23:10, , 79F
10/01 23:10, 79F
→
10/02 00:55, , 80F
10/02 00:55, 80F
→
10/02 00:57, , 81F
10/02 00:57, 81F
→
10/02 00:59, , 82F
10/02 00:59, 82F
→
10/02 00:59, , 83F
10/02 00:59, 83F
→
10/02 01:00, , 84F
10/02 01:00, 84F
→
10/02 01:01, , 85F
10/02 01:01, 85F
→
10/02 01:02, , 86F
10/02 01:02, 86F
→
10/02 01:04, , 87F
10/02 01:04, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):