[討論] 拓荒者為何會突然變成這樣?
這個問題我覺得值得大家討論,也想聽聽大家的看法
我想這幾天對拓迷來說真的蠻低潮的,說是崩潰也不為過
而不僅我們PTT上面的崩潰,國外也是崩潰的一塌糊塗(有在Follow Blazers' Edge
的Twitter的就知道QQ)
而BE也有一些fan post,也有人問到了這樣一個問題,我看了其中幾個回答覺得
心有戚戚焉,分享給大家了!
http://www.blazersedge.com/2015/7/5/8895793/why-did-this-team-blow-up
=> Management probably had a lack of faith in the roster, and Aldridge had a
lack of faith in management
制服組可能對這樣的陣容沒什麼信心,而Aldridge對這樣的制服組沒什麼信心。
=>
The real reason: Wes injury
I’m not blaming Wes though.
in short, when he got hurt like he did, blazers immediately faced once again
paying a lot for a player with a lot of question marks regarding his future
health and how long could he remain healthy. we already went through that
with Roy and Oden, no way we do that to ourselves again.
Nico already expressed desire to leave during his RFA when we had to overpay
to keep him here instead of him going to the wolves. with Wes down, the year
Nico had, along with his own personal issues he’s been dealing with, the
Blazers thought it best to trade him. he gets a new environment, we got
something in return. Afflalo showed interest in being the 6th man of a team
that was contending aka before Wes got hurt. Lastly, LMA himself showed
excitement for a team that was contending, but upon Wes going down, his body
language changed. he realized that team was no more. He was then offered a
better situation than we could and took it. RoLo only makes sense if we keep
the team we had pre-injury. post injury, and especially now in rebuild mode,
it makes more sense to play meyers and plumlee and let RoLo get his payday
somewhere else.
真正的原因是Wes受傷。 我不是要責怪Wes,簡單來說,當他受傷的那一瞬間,拓荒者
立即再次面對一個相似的場景:
是否要花很多錢在一個:
不確定他未來健康狀況如何、不確定是否能保持無病痛的球員身上。
我們已經經歷過了Roy跟Oden,會有這樣的疑慮而趨於保守是正常的。
而Batum早在2012年續約時就表達過他想離開,當時是我們跟進灰狼的報價合約才留住他。
在Wes倒下、Batum又有他的私人問題需要處理(註:可能指傷勢或國家隊比賽),
拓荒者認為交易掉他是最好的選擇,他能換個環境,我們能換些東西回來。
Afflalo對在「Wes倒下以前這個具有競爭力的球隊」當第六人有興趣;
Aldridge則是顯現出他對於能夠待在一隻有競爭力球隊的興奮與熱忱,但那前提都是Wes
還在場上打球。 在他受傷後,Aldridge在場上的肢體語言顯示出他認為拓荒者已經沒
希望了,此時有球隊提供給他比我們能提供的更好的環境,他選擇離開。
RoLo的留下只有對那個Wes倒下之前的球隊才有意義。在傷病之後,特別是現在進入了
重建模式,讓我們主打Meyers+Plumlee然後讓RoLo去追求合理的薪資是沒什麼疑問的。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
覺得Wes受傷真的是很可惜,但是也不能怪他,這種感覺真的是很悶!
總之希望谷底已經到了,之後可以越來越好。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.106.153
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/BLAZERS/M.1436162843.A.48D.html
推
07/06 14:11, , 1F
07/06 14:11, 1F
→
07/06 14:13, , 2F
07/06 14:13, 2F
→
07/06 14:14, , 3F
07/06 14:14, 3F
※ 編輯: Fernandez05 (59.115.106.153), 07/06/2015 14:27:18
推
07/06 14:31, , 4F
07/06 14:31, 4F
→
07/06 14:32, , 5F
07/06 14:32, 5F
推
07/06 14:35, , 6F
07/06 14:35, 6F
→
07/06 14:35, , 7F
07/06 14:35, 7F
推
07/06 14:39, , 8F
07/06 14:39, 8F
推
07/06 15:13, , 9F
07/06 15:13, 9F
推
07/06 15:17, , 10F
07/06 15:17, 10F
→
07/06 15:17, , 11F
07/06 15:17, 11F
推
07/06 15:18, , 12F
07/06 15:18, 12F
→
07/06 15:19, , 13F
07/06 15:19, 13F
→
07/06 15:20, , 14F
07/06 15:20, 14F
目前狀況我給5分,視最後情況而變。
DAJ/Love/Dragic/Monroe這四者裡唯一有機會大概只有Monroe,但公鹿看起來真的
最有可能進季後賽,我想現在慢慢拼湊出來的是 制服組知道LMA不會留,這點Monroe
大概也會知道,所以他不會選擇我們。
至於其他幾位,Joseph家鄉因素大,Lou我覺得沒必要來,會跟CJM搶球搶時間,
我覺得他不是我們目前需要的類型(若reaper大有特別喜歡他的理由請你補充!)
Brewer看起來在火箭很得重用,沒搶到他是有點可惜我同意,但不意外
Green若指的是Danny 這球員不太可能搶的到,Draymond也是。
其實以上說穿了就是都被合理價格給球員更喜歡的球隊簽走,
就這樣來看,也不能怪制服組,畢竟他們不願意overpaid這點我可以接受
而波特蘭對FA沒有什麼吸引力也算非戰之罪吧......
給5分的原因一是目前走的FA全部都是被薪資空間拿走,什麼都沒拿回來。
至於現在入隊的球員我都還蠻喜歡的就是了,所以還有5分......
※ 編輯: Fernandez05 (59.115.106.153), 07/06/2015 15:30:35
推
07/06 16:04, , 15F
07/06 16:04, 15F
→
07/06 16:05, , 16F
07/06 16:05, 16F
推
07/06 16:41, , 17F
07/06 16:41, 17F
→
07/06 16:41, , 18F
07/06 16:41, 18F
→
07/06 16:41, , 19F
07/06 16:41, 19F
→
07/06 16:41, , 20F
07/06 16:41, 20F
推
07/06 16:45, , 21F
07/06 16:45, 21F
推
07/06 16:54, , 22F
07/06 16:54, 22F
→
07/06 16:54, , 23F
07/06 16:54, 23F
→
07/06 18:16, , 24F
07/06 18:16, 24F
推
07/06 18:57, , 25F
07/06 18:57, 25F
推
07/06 18:57, , 26F
07/06 18:57, 26F
→
07/06 18:57, , 27F
07/06 18:57, 27F
→
07/06 18:57, , 28F
07/06 18:57, 28F
→
07/06 18:59, , 29F
07/06 18:59, 29F
推
07/06 19:15, , 30F
07/06 19:15, 30F
→
07/06 19:15, , 31F
07/06 19:15, 31F
→
07/06 19:15, , 32F
07/06 19:15, 32F
推
07/06 19:49, , 33F
07/06 19:49, 33F
→
07/06 19:49, , 34F
07/06 19:49, 34F
推
07/06 20:16, , 35F
07/06 20:16, 35F
推
07/06 20:56, , 36F
07/06 20:56, 36F
推
07/06 20:59, , 37F
07/06 20:59, 37F
→
07/06 20:59, , 38F
07/06 20:59, 38F
→
07/06 20:59, , 39F
07/06 20:59, 39F
→
07/06 20:59, , 40F
07/06 20:59, 40F
→
07/06 20:59, , 41F
07/06 20:59, 41F
→
07/06 21:00, , 42F
07/06 21:00, 42F
→
07/06 21:00, , 43F
07/06 21:00, 43F
推
07/06 21:11, , 44F
07/06 21:11, 44F
推
07/06 21:13, , 45F
07/06 21:13, 45F
推
07/06 21:26, , 46F
07/06 21:26, 46F
→
07/06 21:27, , 47F
07/06 21:27, 47F
推
07/06 21:29, , 48F
07/06 21:29, 48F
推
07/06 22:02, , 49F
07/06 22:02, 49F
→
07/06 22:07, , 50F
07/06 22:07, 50F
→
07/06 22:07, , 51F
07/06 22:07, 51F
→
07/06 22:07, , 52F
07/06 22:07, 52F
→
07/06 22:08, , 53F
07/06 22:08, 53F
推
07/06 22:10, , 54F
07/06 22:10, 54F
→
07/06 22:10, , 55F
07/06 22:10, 55F
推
07/06 22:30, , 56F
07/06 22:30, 56F
推
07/06 22:38, , 57F
07/06 22:38, 57F
推
07/06 22:51, , 58F
07/06 22:51, 58F
→
07/06 22:54, , 59F
07/06 22:54, 59F
→
07/06 22:55, , 60F
07/06 22:55, 60F
推
07/06 22:56, , 61F
07/06 22:56, 61F
→
07/06 23:02, , 62F
07/06 23:02, 62F
推
07/06 23:05, , 63F
07/06 23:05, 63F
推
07/06 23:12, , 64F
07/06 23:12, 64F
推
07/06 23:24, , 65F
07/06 23:24, 65F
→
07/06 23:24, , 66F
07/06 23:24, 66F
推
07/06 23:33, , 67F
07/06 23:33, 67F
→
07/06 23:33, , 68F
07/06 23:33, 68F
推
07/06 23:37, , 69F
07/06 23:37, 69F
推
07/06 23:38, , 70F
07/06 23:38, 70F
推
07/07 08:02, , 71F
07/07 08:02, 71F
推
07/07 08:17, , 72F
07/07 08:17, 72F
推
07/07 08:21, , 73F
07/07 08:21, 73F
→
07/07 08:21, , 74F
07/07 08:21, 74F
推
07/07 08:48, , 75F
07/07 08:48, 75F
推
07/07 11:24, , 76F
07/07 11:24, 76F
→
07/07 11:24, , 77F
07/07 11:24, 77F
→
07/07 11:25, , 78F
07/07 11:25, 78F
推
07/07 11:28, , 79F
07/07 11:28, 79F
推
07/07 12:24, , 80F
07/07 12:24, 80F
推
07/07 12:33, , 81F
07/07 12:33, 81F
→
07/07 12:34, , 82F
07/07 12:34, 82F
→
07/07 12:45, , 83F
07/07 12:45, 83F
推
07/07 14:27, , 84F
07/07 14:27, 84F
→
07/07 14:27, , 85F
07/07 14:27, 85F
→
07/07 16:18, , 86F
07/07 16:18, 86F
推
07/07 20:03, , 87F
07/07 20:03, 87F
推
07/07 23:04, , 88F
07/07 23:04, 88F
→
07/07 23:06, , 89F
07/07 23:06, 89F
→
07/07 23:08, , 90F
07/07 23:08, 90F
→
07/07 23:09, , 91F
07/07 23:09, 91F
推
07/07 23:14, , 92F
07/07 23:14, 92F
→
07/07 23:15, , 93F
07/07 23:15, 93F