[討論] 外國鄉民如是說:

看板BLAZERS作者 (Rudy Fernandez)時間12年前 (2012/03/05 19:57), 編輯推噓15(1505)
留言20則, 14人參與, 最新討論串1/1
鄉民1: freeblzr March 04, 2012 at 8:34AM It really does boil down to Nate's fault. Not because of anything but the simple facts that, as joker said, he is not a good fit for portland's players and he's lost his locker room. Sure he is the same coach that won 51 games, but besides batum and Aldridge (with some Matthews and now pryzbilla) who from this roster was on that team? Those strategies worked primarily because Brandon Roy was possibly one of the best game closers in the history of the sport (look how bad the blazers are in the 4th quarter now.) Roy compensated for the lack of a legitimate offensive game plan. I've been saying this for years, Nate McMillian has absolutely no offensive savvy as a coach. He is still running top of the key ISOs, but now for Crawford, and post ISOs for Aldridge. Without a prolific player like Roy, that strategy is garbage. Portland jumped out out to 7-2 with a breakneck pace, but the country tagged it as a fluke, not because of the skill of the players, but because of the turnover rate. Instead of embracing the turnover rate as a statistical cost of running the other team out of the gym, Nate opted to fix it, and fixing it means slow the game down. His only slow the game down offensive plan is to run ISOs with everyone else on the court just standing there. That's why he doesn't fit this roster. He doesn't mold to who he has, just what he think is best. 鄉民2: I believe you are spot on BMAC. Nate has had his time to prove he can coach, albeit with some injuries and juggling of lineups through the years, but it's obvious he's not an X's and O's guy. Brandon Roy could go one-on-one and salvage wins, but everybody else was standing around. Raymond Felton needs a system, one that creates open shots with motion from everyone. So does Steve Nash. Nate isn't providing that. I would go for a couple of roster changes, but the most important change right now should be the coach. 不過儘管如此,也有很為Nate說話的鄉民: Nate (Keep) no one else out there that can do anything close to him. If someone says Jeff Van Gundy, you should stop being a fan. There is a reason he is still an announcer. There is honestly no body out there that can do better than Nate. 這篇下面其實意見蠻多元的,有人批評Canzano整篇提到該留的人一堆,就是沒提Camby跟 Felton。(Canzano的立場是都是球員的錯,Nate是無辜的) 不過仔細掃下來,覺得Nate該走的人不在少數。 還有Paul Allen也被點名,拓荒者從成功走向失敗的轉折點就是在選秀會當天Fire掉KP... 然後讓Larry Miller掌控了這隻球隊... 唉 說真的,就算Nate真的被炒了,缺少一個Truly Leader的我們,我覺得要走過季後賽 第一輪還是有很大的難度的...... 大家覺得哪些球員是絕對不能走的呢? 我覺得只有Aldridge/Batum/Elliot Williams 頂多再算上Matthews(但他今年的表現讓我也很失望) 其他人... QQ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.169.184.224

03/05 19:59, , 1F
AG+Batum 其他人都能動 可能要到大破大立的時候了
03/05 19:59, 1F

03/05 20:01, , 2F
但我覺得PA根本就沒有心在這上面了..
03/05 20:01, 2F

03/05 20:02, , 3F
AG+88 其他隨便
03/05 20:02, 3F

03/05 20:20, , 4F
剛剛也看到有消息說多隻球隊對尻佛有興趣,希望不要被搶
03/05 20:20, 4F

03/05 20:20, , 5F
我是覺得Felton也值得留啦(如果換教練的話)......
03/05 20:20, 5F

03/05 20:44, , 6F
AG + Batum + G蛙
03/05 20:44, 6F

03/05 20:48, , 7F
同意轉折點是KP 看看現在的溜馬 我好想念KP 唉唉
03/05 20:48, 7F

03/05 21:43, , 8F
AGG+82+Gwa+尻佛(佛心約)+肥頓(是教練害你的)都要留
03/05 21:43, 8F

03/05 22:16, , 9F
我覺得只有Aldrisge
03/05 22:16, 9F

03/05 22:20, , 10F
偉大的總管KP現在去哪啦?
03/05 22:20, 10F

03/05 22:23, , 11F
溜馬
03/05 22:23, 11F

03/05 22:52, , 12F
真的覺得今年這種組合沒打好很可惜 幹死了
03/05 22:52, 12F

03/05 22:57, , 13F
AGG Batum Matthews Smith該留 剩下就等合約到或交易吧
03/05 22:57, 13F

03/05 23:01, , 14F
球季都打一半了 連個正職GM都沒有 真的滿酷的!
03/05 23:01, 14F

03/06 00:55, , 15F
大家都忘了大P
03/06 00:55, 15F

03/06 01:32, , 16F
AGG+88+坎比換魔獸+隨便肥約。G蛙+Felton換朗多。來個
03/06 01:32, 16F

03/06 02:01, , 17F
Rondo是西瓜最不愛的型吧 他來就變Crawford先發了
03/06 02:01, 17F

03/06 14:15, , 18F
第一個外國鄉民說的簡直就是切中要害!!!每一句話都
03/06 14:15, 18F

03/06 14:16, , 19F
Nate的問題!!!至於那個護航的人根本就沒有說出任何
03/06 14:16, 19F

03/06 14:17, , 20F
就事論事的說法吧...擺明就是為護航而護航...
03/06 14:17, 20F
文章代碼(AID): #1FLAeIAz (BLAZERS)