[hoop] 神棍普理查德:我早就不願簽羅伊

看板BLAZERS作者 (起起伏伏)時間13年前 (2011/07/03 10:48), 編輯推噓9(9015)
留言24則, 11人參與, 最新討論串1/1
標題:神棍普理查德:我早就不願簽羅伊 拓荒者前GM普理查德(Kevin Pritchard)在接受750-TheGame電台採訪時表示,作為總經理 的他在09年時對是否給予羅伊頂薪合約猶豫不決,結果造成他非常大的負面壓力(以至於 後來被解雇?),而球隊在頂薪續約羅伊的時候已經很清楚他的膝蓋問題。 大陸虎扑 http://news.hoopchina.com/201107/63621.html ===分隔一下=== 我看到這標題,想了很久,到底是大陸用詞"神棍"跟台灣用法不一樣還是怎樣? 於是點了大陸原po的消息來源 http://bit.ly/lVdL4v 原文標題:Pritchard: Blazers Knew About Roy’s Knee Issues Former Blazers GM Kevin Pritchard told 750-AM The Game that he was hesitant to sign Brandon Roy to a max deal in ’09, and that created a ton of negative press for him: “Kevin Pritchard said the Blazers were aware of Brandon Roy’ s knee issues when they gave him the max contract.” 大陸人翻譯得差不多,可是亂下標題 後來看到下面其中一篇國外網友的評論,覺得他說的一部分有理,也讓我思考Roy的問題 al29 Posted: Jul.2 at 6:20 pm GMs/owners shouldn’t let fans’ perceptions dictate their actions. Signing Roy to a long-term deal just to make the fans think they were trying hard was illogical. Who cares what fans think- they will fill the stadium as long as the team is competitive. I love the Blazers and I respect Roy, but it was a big mistake to sign him to a long-term deal when his health was in question. But the Blazers learned nothing- they just extended Greg Oden’s deal when the guy has proved absolutely nothing to them. Owners and players are both responsible for this lockout. All it takes is a handful of owners to give giant contracts to guys like Joe Johnson, and it forces everyone to shell out the big bucks. The league cannot be profitable if guys like David West and Carlos Boozer walk away from teams like Utah and New Orleans. If Roy had walked away, and then been signed to a long-term deal in another city, and then become injured, Pritchard would have looked like a genius. GM跟球團只會考慮球隊競爭力而不會去管球迷怎麼看待 我是拓荒者的球迷也尊敬Roy,但是當時Roy有傷的問題還跟他簽下長約 這麼作實在不合常理,而且這是個錯誤 現在Oden也是類似的狀況,卻又走上同樣的路 這次封館,老闆跟球員都有責任 只有少數大市場的球隊才能提供大約給...Joe Johnson、David West、Carlos Boozer 這樣的球員,如此惡性競爭造成聯盟難以獲利 (最後一句有引戰意味) 如果Roy去到別隊,簽了長約才受傷,KP才像是個睿智的GM 最後,我曉得板友都愛戴KP跟Roy,我也愛看Roy運球切入 但我不曉得當時Roy說法是什麼,感覺是KP感受到來自球迷的負面評論 球團最後還是決定一賭,放下Roy的傷痛問題跟他簽長約... 並不是留下Roy不好(球迷都愛看),但是這幾年膝蓋傷那麼嚴重的Roy 用頂薪留他5年,對拓荒者未來補強或續約都會是個隱憂(像是明年的G蛙) 要是未來CBA談到後來,結果確定硬薪資上限受限...Roy還是很難留得住 Player 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Brandon Roy $14,940,153 $16,359,805 $17,779,458 $19,199,110 Gerald Wallace $10,650,000 $11,437,500 ... .. . TOTALS: $66,343,649 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.170.16.241

07/03 11:10, , 1F
Oden 880且一年還好 Roy確實比較麻煩處理
07/03 11:10, 1F

07/03 11:23, , 2F
挖賽ROY最後一年領快兩千萬喔= =真驚人
07/03 11:23, 2F

07/03 12:17, , 3F
請問KP現在人在哪阿?
07/03 12:17, 3F

07/03 12:21, , 4F
在他床上睡覺吧
07/03 12:21, 4F

07/03 14:36, , 5F
問題是那時Roy的表現真的很好,就算膝蓋有些傷勢,也不得
07/03 14:36, 5F

07/03 14:37, , 6F
不簽,折衷的方式就是合約不是有些出賽場次的獎勵金...
07/03 14:37, 6F

07/03 20:48, , 7F
我相信GM其時有更好的合約配套 問題是簽頂薪這點
07/03 20:48, 7F

07/04 00:31, , 8F
不要怕 新CBA出來後G挖可以換約
07/04 00:31, 8F

07/04 01:03, , 9F
還有G挖一定要留阿 留著跟82打總冠軍時後對付LBJ
07/04 01:03, 9F

07/06 15:00, , 10F
硬上限不是說不能超過,而是超過了只能用最底薪去補足人數
07/06 15:00, 10F

07/06 15:01, , 11F
換言之也就是沒所謂的特例條款(中產,雙年,傷病等)球隊想補
07/06 15:01, 11F

07/06 15:01, , 12F
強陣容除了新秀,就是要有不少薪資空間
07/06 15:01, 12F

07/09 18:22, , 13F
Oden的880是QO不是真正的合約吧
07/09 18:22, 13F

07/09 20:55, , 14F
A hard cap doesn't allow the cap to be exceeded for
07/09 20:55, 14F

07/09 20:55, , 15F
any reason.
07/09 20:55, 15F

07/09 20:55, , 16F
另外如果 Greg Oden 接受了 8.8M 的報價
07/09 20:55, 16F

07/09 20:56, , 17F
明年他的薪水就是8.8M 如果不接受 則拓荒者有跟進報價權
07/09 20:56, 17F

07/09 20:58, , 18F
其他球隊開出的報價如果 Oden 接受了,拓荒者也可以跟進
07/09 20:58, 18F

07/09 20:58, , 19F
把 Oden 留在隊上
07/09 20:58, 19F

07/09 21:15, , 20F
硬上限就真的是「硬」上限,至少在目前老闆方的提案裡
07/09 21:15, 20F

07/09 21:16, , 21F
是一塊錢都不能超過,否則可以罰款+取消選秀權
07/09 21:16, 21F

07/09 21:16, , 22F
而且受罰完,還是得在一定期限內,降到硬上限以下
07/09 21:16, 22F

07/09 21:17, , 23F
否則可以再罰。 (真的很硬...)
07/09 21:17, 23F

07/10 01:51, , 24F
應該不會有球隊出比880w多給Oden 所以等於拓就是用8.8m賭他
07/10 01:51, 24F
文章代碼(AID): #1E3zY5EJ (BLAZERS)