[閒聊]高勝率單排災難與平均勝率配對機制合理性
看板ArenaOfValor作者pacesetter (willsonzzzwang)時間6年前 (2017/10/05 23:58)推噓23(25推 2噓 56→)留言83則, 30人參與討論串1/1
本人今天早上是C1 滿星4星
更是積分99/100 的狀態
對 沒錯 只差1分 就可以上B5
今早還開玩笑發臉書跟朋友說
https://i.imgur.com/D6YSRfM.jpg
結果 果不其然 全被路人雷到連輸五場
現在面臨到可能掉階的情形
https://i.imgur.com/Q7RMSPX.jpg
我不敢說我自己多強
但我相信我在這五場中
不管是選角配合、遊戲觀念、操作技巧
全部都有到位的人
我不明白為什麼可以一直配對到
「掛網」、「銅牌練角」、「輸出不到10%打野」
這種團隊5個成員中
有1個便會拖垮整個團隊的路人
而且還是每場各遇到1個
憑良心講
遊戲本來就是有輸有贏
我們的情緒也不應該被遊戲左右
不過前提是建立在一切公平的基礎之下
但為什麼此遊戲的配對機制
一定要以平均勝率來做配對組合的條件?
(也就是 高勝率玩家 搭配 低勝率玩家 為同隊)
目前這種配對機制
只會讓
1.爛的人幸運的升階
2.強的人被雷到升不上去
排位的等階完全不等同玩家的實力與觀念
我雖然沒有玩英雄聯盟
但聽說他們的配對機制
是由同等勝率的組成同隊
對抗同等勝率的敵隊
這樣不才是能使玩家
在遊戲經驗裡成長的良好循環嗎?
https://i.imgur.com/hY0fyeb.jpg
附上不是雷包的證據
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.206.7.37
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/RealmOfValor/M.1507219135.A.788.html
推
10/06 00:13, , 1F
10/06 00:13, 1F
→
10/06 00:14, , 2F
10/06 00:14, 2F
→
10/06 00:15, , 3F
10/06 00:15, 3F
推
10/06 00:18, , 4F
10/06 00:18, 4F
→
10/06 00:18, , 5F
10/06 00:18, 5F
→
10/06 00:21, , 6F
10/06 00:21, 6F
→
10/06 00:51, , 7F
10/06 00:51, 7F
→
10/06 00:52, , 8F
10/06 00:52, 8F
→
10/06 00:52, , 9F
10/06 00:52, 9F
推
10/06 01:02, , 10F
10/06 01:02, 10F
推
10/06 01:12, , 11F
10/06 01:12, 11F
→
10/06 01:19, , 12F
10/06 01:19, 12F
→
10/06 01:19, , 13F
10/06 01:19, 13F
推
10/06 01:25, , 14F
10/06 01:25, 14F
→
10/06 01:27, , 15F
10/06 01:27, 15F
→
10/06 01:27, , 16F
10/06 01:27, 16F
→
10/06 01:29, , 17F
10/06 01:29, 17F
→
10/06 01:44, , 18F
10/06 01:44, 18F
→
10/06 01:47, , 19F
10/06 01:47, 19F
→
10/06 01:48, , 20F
10/06 01:48, 20F
→
10/06 01:48, , 21F
10/06 01:48, 21F
→
10/06 01:48, , 22F
10/06 01:48, 22F
→
10/06 01:49, , 23F
10/06 01:49, 23F
→
10/06 01:49, , 24F
10/06 01:49, 24F
→
10/06 01:51, , 25F
10/06 01:51, 25F
→
10/06 01:51, , 26F
10/06 01:51, 26F
→
10/06 01:51, , 27F
10/06 01:51, 27F
→
10/06 01:53, , 28F
10/06 01:53, 28F
→
10/06 01:54, , 29F
10/06 01:54, 29F
推
10/06 02:19, , 30F
10/06 02:19, 30F
推
10/06 02:21, , 31F
10/06 02:21, 31F
→
10/06 02:28, , 32F
10/06 02:28, 32F
→
10/06 02:29, , 33F
10/06 02:29, 33F
→
10/06 02:29, , 34F
10/06 02:29, 34F
→
10/06 02:59, , 35F
10/06 02:59, 35F
→
10/06 02:59, , 36F
10/06 02:59, 36F
噓
10/06 05:55, , 37F
10/06 05:55, 37F
推
10/06 07:41, , 38F
10/06 07:41, 38F
→
10/06 07:42, , 39F
10/06 07:42, 39F
推
10/06 07:42, , 40F
10/06 07:42, 40F
推
10/06 08:42, , 41F
10/06 08:42, 41F
→
10/06 08:43, , 42F
10/06 08:43, 42F
→
10/06 08:44, , 43F
10/06 08:44, 43F
推
10/06 08:45, , 44F
10/06 08:45, 44F
→
10/06 08:45, , 45F
10/06 08:45, 45F
→
10/06 08:56, , 46F
10/06 08:56, 46F
→
10/06 08:58, , 47F
10/06 08:58, 47F
→
10/06 08:58, , 48F
10/06 08:58, 48F
推
10/06 09:24, , 49F
10/06 09:24, 49F
推
10/06 09:46, , 50F
10/06 09:46, 50F
推
10/06 09:50, , 51F
10/06 09:50, 51F
→
10/06 11:24, , 52F
10/06 11:24, 52F
→
10/06 11:24, , 53F
10/06 11:24, 53F
→
10/06 12:15, , 54F
10/06 12:15, 54F
→
10/06 12:15, , 55F
10/06 12:15, 55F
→
10/06 12:15, , 56F
10/06 12:15, 56F
推
10/06 14:36, , 57F
10/06 14:36, 57F
→
10/06 15:31, , 58F
10/06 15:31, 58F
推
10/06 15:31, , 59F
10/06 15:31, 59F
推
10/06 17:04, , 60F
10/06 17:04, 60F
→
10/06 17:06, , 61F
10/06 17:06, 61F
推
10/06 18:06, , 62F
10/06 18:06, 62F
推
10/06 18:59, , 63F
10/06 18:59, 63F
→
10/06 18:59, , 64F
10/06 18:59, 64F
推
10/06 20:44, , 65F
10/06 20:44, 65F
→
10/06 23:02, , 66F
10/06 23:02, 66F
→
10/06 23:02, , 67F
10/06 23:02, 67F
→
10/06 23:07, , 68F
10/06 23:07, 68F
→
10/06 23:07, , 69F
10/06 23:07, 69F
→
10/06 23:08, , 70F
10/06 23:08, 70F
→
10/06 23:08, , 71F
10/06 23:08, 71F
→
10/06 23:08, , 72F
10/06 23:08, 72F
推
10/07 07:32, , 73F
10/07 07:32, 73F
→
10/07 07:33, , 74F
10/07 07:33, 74F
→
10/07 07:33, , 75F
10/07 07:33, 75F
→
10/07 11:27, , 76F
10/07 11:27, 76F
噓
10/07 11:47, , 77F
10/07 11:47, 77F
推
10/07 11:50, , 78F
10/07 11:50, 78F
推
10/07 15:23, , 79F
10/07 15:23, 79F
推
10/08 13:43, , 80F
10/08 13:43, 80F
→
10/08 13:43, , 81F
10/08 13:43, 81F
→
10/08 13:43, , 82F
10/08 13:43, 82F
推
10/10 17:42, , 83F
10/10 17:42, 83F