[情報] 正名官司.....

看板Angels作者 (相信妳自己,真的....)時間17年前 (2008/12/20 19:42), 編輯推噓7(9推 2噓 27→)
留言38則, 14人參與, 最新討論串1/1
→
12/14 18:05,
叫橘郡人去買吧, 該屬地化了, 科(海灘人是M形上面的...)
12/14 18:05
就來吐槽一下這句話吧.... 我們官司打贏了.... The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim是我們的正式名稱.... 我想OC官方應該不會再上訴到the California Supreme Court... 所以應該就此定案.. http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-angels20-2008dec20,0,7134077.story -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 169.234.118.243
推
12/20 21:37, , 1F
所以中文應該要翻 洛杉磯 安那罕天使 隊?
12/20 21:37, 1F
推
12/21 03:18, , 2F
用中華民國在台灣這個風格來翻就好了
12/21 03:18, 2F
推
12/21 07:55, , 3F
所以是洛杉磯天使在安那罕?
12/21 07:55, 3F
→
12/21 08:35, , 4F
是的..簡稱洛杉磯天使...呵呵...
12/21 08:35, 4F
推
12/21 20:13, , 5F
Hence, I was wrong. I respect ur judicial decision.
12/21 20:13, 5F
→
12/21 20:13, , 6F
But I'm glad you still followed that news. I didn't.
12/21 20:13, 6F
→
12/21 20:13, , 7F
Thanks man, I like your balls, that's what brings
12/21 20:13, 7F
→
12/21 20:13, , 8F
truth to me, and it helps, thank you.
12/21 20:13, 8F
→
12/21 20:52, , 9F
這裡是大安國還是天使版
12/21 20:52, 9F
→
12/21 21:05, , 10F
Moreno wanted it all, and he won his case.
12/21 21:05, 10F
→
12/21 21:05, , 11F
If Seibu Lions wants "Tokyo-Saitama Lions", and they
12/21 21:05, 11F
→
12/21 21:06, , 12F
won that case (which I bet they would, though
12/21 21:06, 12F
→
12/21 21:06, , 13F
) even if Seibu only wanted customers from Tokyo,
12/21 21:06, 13F
→
12/21 21:06, , 14F
it's still a respectable business decision... btw,
12/21 21:06, 14F
→
12/21 21:06, , 15F
there were NO ONE in Anaheim a decade ago, Moreno
12/21 21:06, 15F
→
12/21 21:07, , 16F
must be a genius going there...
12/21 21:07, 16F
→
12/21 21:07, , 17F
i meant, 30 yrs ago...my aunt was there, she knows...
12/21 21:07, 17F
推
12/21 21:09, , 18F
釜山天使隊 才是正解
12/21 21:09, 18F
噓
12/21 23:29, , 19F
we don't appreciate view from a cub fan
12/21 23:29, 19F
推
12/22 07:54, , 20F
大安國天使板XD
12/22 07:54, 20F
噓
12/22 08:08, , 21F
Where is your NTUST student ID ????????
12/22 08:08, 21F
→
12/22 09:21, , 22F
ten duck, dig duck, tiger duck!
12/22 09:21, 22F
→
12/22 14:37, , 23F
這篇是在吵什麼? 烙一些語句不通順的英文是要表達什麼?
12/22 14:37, 23F
推
12/22 22:50, , 24F
he's speaking Da-anish, not Danish
12/22 22:50, 24F
→
12/23 16:08, , 25F
請看一下日期....我沒那些美國時間follow....
12/23 16:08, 25F
→
12/23 16:09, , 26F
雖然我是過安那罕時間....
12/23 16:09, 26F
→
12/23 16:11, , 27F
latimes 12/20也就兩篇天使新聞而已...需要follow嗎?
12/23 16:11, 27F
→
12/23 20:41, , 28F
i dont even read LA Times, my friend...
12/23 20:41, 28F
→
12/23 20:50, , 29F
乾我屁事?
12/23 20:50, 29F
→
12/23 21:21, , 30F
you said it... and why should I follow your news?
12/23 21:21, 30F
→
12/23 21:22, , 31F
有人叫你follow news嗎?
12/23 21:22, 31F
→
12/23 21:22, , 32F
it's a useful piece of info., but not something
12/23 21:22, 32F
→
12/23 21:22, , 33F
i'm urgent in the know...
12/23 21:22, 33F
→
12/23 21:23, , 34F
我不過就是順手把文章po來....
12/23 21:23, 34F
→
12/23 21:23, , 35F
你care不care,我一點也不care..
12/23 21:23, 35F
推
12/23 23:17, , 36F
可以不要打英文嘛-_-
12/23 23:17, 36F
→
12/24 03:36, , 37F
要打也麻煩注意一下文法
12/24 03:36, 37F
推
12/24 05:39, , 38F
......................果然到哪 就吵到哪
12/24 05:39, 38F
‣ 更多 tunababy 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #19JDeUaz (Angels)