[問題] 讓我不知怎回答的回覆(審稿)
小弟不才在半年前,第一次擔任某生醫材料領域期刊的reviewer,
審到一篇有關laser cladding的論文,其實我真的不知道他的研
究重點在哪,該做的生醫試驗性質,熱影響與結合性質試驗都沒有
做,因為第一次審稿又不好意思勾退稿,因此,小弟跟他提了十幾項
問題,要求他補實驗後再審,最近想說半年過去了,它應該知難而退了
沒想到他在今天回覆過來了,我心想這Author真的是有心,這麼多實驗
他都補了很好,那我也熬夜快來幫他審,沒想到一開起來十幾個問題,
大概有十項都給我回答We described that research results on
bioactivity will be reported in the next report.或We described
that the appropriate bonding strength, along with bioactivity,
will be reported in the next report.我真的有點傻眼,我不知道該
怎麼審下去,我可以回答他:那我可以下次再審嗎???在此請問版上大大
您們有類似經驗嗎?怎處理才恰當?謝謝
PS.不好意思排版有點亂,請各位見諒
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.70.80.89
推
08/17 02:41, , 1F
08/17 02:41, 1F
推
08/17 02:52, , 2F
08/17 02:52, 2F
推
08/17 08:00, , 3F
08/17 08:00, 3F
→
08/17 09:06, , 4F
08/17 09:06, 4F
推
08/17 10:14, , 5F
08/17 10:14, 5F
推
08/17 10:20, , 6F
08/17 10:20, 6F
推
08/17 10:50, , 7F
08/17 10:50, 7F
→
08/17 11:06, , 8F
08/17 11:06, 8F
推
08/17 11:48, , 9F
08/17 11:48, 9F
→
08/17 11:57, , 10F
08/17 11:57, 10F
→
08/17 11:59, , 11F
08/17 11:59, 11F
→
08/17 11:59, , 12F
08/17 11:59, 12F
→
08/17 12:01, , 13F
08/17 12:01, 13F
推
08/17 16:50, , 14F
08/17 16:50, 14F
→
08/17 21:30, , 15F
08/17 21:30, 15F
推
08/18 03:07, , 16F
08/18 03:07, 16F
→
08/18 03:07, , 17F
08/18 03:07, 17F
→
08/18 03:08, , 18F
08/18 03:08, 18F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):