[AOE2] 大家覺不覺得有一些城堡兵好像是被忽視 …
個人雖然玩帝國2玩的不多
不過發現一些種族的vv兵好像都會被玩家無視似的....
首先是法蘭克人....(擲斧兵)
基本上選法蘭克的玩家都是因為騎兵有+20%HP...
所以大家幾乎都是去海起遊俠,而不會考慮擲斧兵....
擲斧兵到底是為了什麼而存在的 =.=
血薄不在話下(60hp),攻擊力也沒很突出(12),攻擊範圍也只有5(精銳+倒鉤斧)
心想...那個算是可以打擊哥德衛隊的兵之一(哥衛近防低是弱點)
但是哥衛海,用遊俠海就可以吃光光了...
再來是塞爾特人...(菘藍武士)
原因是因為是城堡兵,量產不易...
大家都會選擇海劍勇(跟菘武同樣會+15%移速),而且也比菘武便宜5黃金...
軍營也很好蓋,很容易便會海出一堆劍勇來...
大家覺得還有沒有其他vv兵都會被人忽視的?
--
\( ̄▽ ̄)/ ( \ ̄▽)/ ( \  ̄) \( )/ (@ / ) \(﹏@/ ) \(@﹏@)/
The time is now...
\(@﹏@)/ ( \@﹏)/ ( \ @) \( )/ ( ̄ / ) \(▽ ̄/ ) \( ̄▽ ̄)/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.156.102
推
06/01 18:33, , 1F
06/01 18:33, 1F
推
06/01 18:36, , 2F
06/01 18:36, 2F
→
06/01 18:38, , 3F
06/01 18:38, 3F
→
06/01 18:39, , 4F
06/01 18:39, 4F
→
06/01 18:41, , 5F
06/01 18:41, 5F
→
06/01 18:42, , 6F
06/01 18:42, 6F
推
06/01 18:44, , 7F
06/01 18:44, 7F
→
06/01 18:46, , 8F
06/01 18:46, 8F
→
06/01 18:46, , 9F
06/01 18:46, 9F
推
06/01 19:16, , 10F
06/01 19:16, 10F
→
06/01 19:17, , 11F
06/01 19:17, 11F
→
06/01 19:18, , 12F
06/01 19:18, 12F
→
06/01 19:33, , 13F
06/01 19:33, 13F
→
06/01 19:40, , 14F
06/01 19:40, 14F
推
06/01 19:58, , 15F
06/01 19:58, 15F
→
06/01 20:03, , 16F
06/01 20:03, 16F
推
06/01 20:03, , 17F
06/01 20:03, 17F
→
06/01 20:04, , 18F
06/01 20:04, 18F
→
06/01 20:04, , 19F
06/01 20:04, 19F
推
06/01 20:20, , 20F
06/01 20:20, 20F
推
06/01 20:25, , 21F
06/01 20:25, 21F
推
06/01 21:05, , 22F
06/01 21:05, 22F
→
06/01 21:09, , 23F
06/01 21:09, 23F
推
06/01 21:17, , 24F
06/01 21:17, 24F
→
06/01 21:18, , 25F
06/01 21:18, 25F
→
06/01 21:19, , 26F
06/01 21:19, 26F
→
06/01 21:19, , 27F
06/01 21:19, 27F
推
06/01 21:21, , 28F
06/01 21:21, 28F
推
06/01 21:22, , 29F
06/01 21:22, 29F
推
06/01 21:38, , 30F
06/01 21:38, 30F
推
06/01 22:13, , 31F
06/01 22:13, 31F
推
06/02 00:39, , 32F
06/02 00:39, 32F
→
06/02 00:57, , 33F
06/02 00:57, 33F
推
06/02 02:00, , 34F
06/02 02:00, 34F
→
06/02 02:03, , 35F
06/02 02:03, 35F
※ 編輯: meteor9 來自: 140.119.156.102 (06/02 02:03)
推
06/02 02:05, , 36F
06/02 02:05, 36F
→
06/02 02:05, , 37F
06/02 02:05, 37F
推
06/02 02:38, , 38F
06/02 02:38, 38F
→
06/02 04:08, , 39F
06/02 04:08, 39F
→
06/02 05:18, , 40F
06/02 05:18, 40F
→
06/02 10:46, , 41F
06/02 10:46, 41F
推
06/02 10:47, , 42F
06/02 10:47, 42F
推
06/02 11:42, , 43F
06/02 11:42, 43F
→
06/02 15:23, , 44F
06/02 15:23, 44F
推
06/02 15:27, , 45F
06/02 15:27, 45F
→
06/02 17:28, , 46F
06/02 17:28, 46F
→
06/02 17:29, , 47F
06/02 17:29, 47F
→
06/02 17:29, , 48F
06/02 17:29, 48F
→
06/02 17:54, , 49F
06/02 17:54, 49F
推
06/03 13:26, , 50F
06/03 13:26, 50F
推
06/03 17:55, , 51F
06/03 17:55, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):