作者查詢 / CrazyMarc
作者 CrazyMarc 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共6795則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部politics2182LAW1074stationery672Insurance464Policy262L_SecretGard240CFP234KMT223Lawyer200DPP188PttLifeLaw141HatePolitics121Fund64calligraphic61Suit_Style52Steam49HolySee45LegalTheory40B93A013XX34Examination34Wargaming32ChineseMed26Gossiping19About_Life17CrossStrait17tax16W-Philosophy13L_LifePlan12B95A013XX10ID_Multi10B94A013XX9Beauty9TANAKA9RIPE_gender8LawsuitSug7medache7Salesperson7SUN7toberich7FORMULA16Marxism6GreenParty4MCU-LAW4a-diane3Atheism3CTSH923033drawing3money3NEW_ROC3NTU-PDC3NTUBIME-1023PCCU_MLAW3StupidClown3Tobacco3TSU3B93A012XX2B97A013XX2HsinTien2Japandrama2Kojima2KOTDFansClub2MetalGear2NTULawR972PttLaw2Scorpio2sex2AGEC941AGECR901Agronomy-931B911010XX1B91303XXX1B923022XX1B923023XX1B92A013XX1B933021XX1B96A013XX1bioinfo_lab1CATCH1CFantasy1CGSH87th_3151ChthoniC1civil911civil921cksh81st3021Coffee1DummyHistory1DYU1Economics1Education1EMS1ESOE-911ESOE-921FJU_Psy961FLAT_CLUB1Geotecheng941INSECT-921KS92-3061KUAS_5880321media-chaos1Military1Militarylife1MountainClub1MU1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_CivLaw1NCCU_CriLaw1NCCU_FunLaw1NCCU_LSWLAW1NCCU_PubLaw1NTOU-MME-99B1NTPUprolaw981NTU-EM921NTU-EM931NTU-EM941NTU96thLIS1NTUAC911NtuDormF51NTUDormG11NtuDormM31NtuDormM51NTUDormM61NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUEE1061NTUEE1071NTUEOE_R306A1NTUF-921NTUF-941NTUFM-911NTUGIEE_EDA1NTUHistory941NTULawR931NTUMEB91-B1NTUMEB93-A1NTUMEB93-B1NTUMSE-911NTUMSE-921NTUMSE-931NTUMSE-941NTUnba20051NTUnSA1NTUSA1P2PSoftWare1PC_Shopping1Philosophy1PoliticLaw1PresidentLi1Printer_scan1PU_Law1PublicAffair1PublicServan1shoes1single1study1Tainan1TNFSH94011TTU-AFL1TunHua05t3111TW-history1TYSH49-1101Warfare1<< 收起看板(161)
Re: [閒聊] 經濟不好政府是不是要負全責?
[ a-diane ]0 留言, 推噓總分: 0
(17年前)
4F推:一切都是人民的錯,立委不投給民進黨,123.193.18.22 03/21 16:30
6F→:係後!!!123.193.18.22 03/21 16:30
56F推:884567803/21 16:27
1F推:何不先把你的理解PO上來?03/18 11:07
8F推:我還是偏好老掉牙的德國觀念論03/14 15:53
2F推:結果還沒出來嗎?123.193.18.22 04/02 14:35
1F推:非故意肇事,無過失逃逸02/22 12:16
2F→:§185-4的逃逸必須是故意逃逸02/22 12:17
3F→:或得認知已肇事卻未盡注意而未認知→過失02/22 12:18
4F→:ㄜ...修正...過失應該不罰,本最應該只處罰故意犯02/22 12:19
5F→:認真看了一下,有陷阱,題目是"得為",因此其實非故意02/22 12:20
6F→:肇事逃逸就能成為本罪主體02/22 12:22
7F→:且無過失應該只是附加的敘述02/22 12:22
8F→:第二題正犯應該是不會成立的,沒有實行行為02/22 12:23
10F→:因為題目沒看完整就急著回答 XD02/23 14:17
11F→:第一題肇事如果是故意就要以殺人或傷害論處了02/23 14:30
12F→:至於有無過失應該不是重點,只要有認知到肇事就有成立肇02/23 14:32
13F→:事逃逸的可能02/23 14:33
4F推:陳妙芬的部分要多注意女性主義法學,期末考會考02/02 22:24
5F→:王泰升的要看他的書台灣法律史百選02/02 22:25
6F→:顏厥安我沒上過,聽說他上課取材比較廣,不好準備02/02 22:25
1F推:年輕人自己再怎麼拼,產業人力需求會自己增加嗎?01/15 02:23
4F推:認真文 推123.193.19.90 01/14 21:28
12F推:中肯文123.193.19.90 01/13 18:32