作者查詢 / bll135
作者 bll135 在 PTT [ book ] 看板的留言(推文), 共109則
限定看板：book
看板排序：
全部PHX-Suns33259MCU_Talk5915poem5004NBA4257Cobras2169sex1310LoL379Gossiping377GoranDragic322CHCUP187PttHistory165Libra149NY-Yankees117book109Transfer106NBA_Fantasy105MiamiHeat104TKU_Talk100BLAZERS98FJU-Family93AHQ78Ahqwestdoor78FCU_EE97A78Lakers78Knicks73SMSlife71HY-40-Xin69NBAEasyChat68Taurus68CYSH97Y31867FCU_EE97B67L_BoyMeetsGi66PSWO3rd66TKU_CHISB65NCHU-FS10064UTAH-JAZZ60VinceCarter60LitService57TKU_EW94B57Rockets55CFantasy54GrantHill54DYU51NHLUE-ILT51Kings50Sportcenter49marvel46Spurs45Mavericks39Onmyoji36prose35SteveNash1334Taiwanlit34Hawks30Orl-Magic30PACERS30Softball30YZU_CN99A30GossipPicket28TamShui26Hate25NCU97ME-B25Sixers24Cavaliers23Raptors20Celtics19Nets19Shu-Lin19ShuangHe19SongShan19Stock19PushDoll18You_out17Literprize16NBA_Film16Bucks15HK_Comics15NDHU_CSIE1215ChicagoBulls14FLAT_CLUB14G-S-WARRIORS14TKU_trans14Violation13P2PSoftWare12CourtBasketB11NTPU-ACC9711SP2_Basket11Timberwolves11Chiayi10SYSOP10Emergency9NCCU09_PHILO9NCU_MATH869NDHU-dcTT9Viator98Bing9Baseball8cksh85th3178HCSHch13_3118IVERSON8JasonKidd8Jeremy_Lin8LeBronJames8NDHU-CGB8NDHU-ChBb8NDHU-dc-VB8NDHU-dcBm8NDHU-dcCM8NDHU-dcSB8Nuggets8PttBug8SCU_Talk8CSMU-HSA967Grizzlies7japanavgirls7L_TalkandCha7Whales7Wizards7ccsh_86_3256FAPL6GIEE_986NCCU_poetry6NDHU-dc1026PokeMon6specialman6Tobacco6CourtSports5eWriter5Hualien5LaClippers5LTK5NUU_Motor5Old-Games5PublicIssue5SP3_AllSport5story5YAO5AntiVirus4bookhouse4CMU_Talk4gallantry4KingdomHuang4NCHU-AGR074NTUST_Talk4NTUT_CH585A4Pistons4Taitung4Teacher4TFSHS68th3124TFSHS68th3214TigerBlue4Chinese3CSMU-AC923CYHSBAND3Detective3Golden-Award3haiku3HatePicket3HSNU_10083HSNU_11433ILSH-973093Kids_Sucker3KoreaStar3KOTDFansClub3L_SecretGard3LTSH-963113MartialArts3MCUBT97_23medstudent3movie3MysteryStory3NCHU-Stat973NKUTEE3novel3NTUST-ECE3PCCU_Talk3Pelicans3rent-exp3SENIORHIGH3SHAQ3SHINROCK3StupidClown3STUST3SuperStarAve3Taoyuan3TFSHS68th3153Thunder3TunHua05t3113twin3TY_Research3YomiuriGIANT3Anchors2Annie2B97A013XX2balaz2ChineseMed2cksh84th3032CMU_NEWs2CNU2consumer2CourtGeneral2CSHS57th3142CSMU-MIS952CSMU-SO2CSU2CTSH91-3022CTSH933032CTSH963022Dragons2DTJH_3222Eason2FJU-FS932FSHS-95-3082graduate2Hornets2HSNU_10912HSNU_11152HSNU_11462hwhEE_592B2ID_Multi2ID_Problem2joke2KS92-3122KS93-3102KS95-3112KS96-3052KS97-3162KUAS2Lineage2LIT_EE972Lottery2Malaysia2Marginalman2MCU_trans2Militarylife2MuscleBeach2NCAA2NCCU2NCCU_CL_VB2NDHU-His1002NDHU_FIN992NDHU_GILM972NDMC-D622NKNU_ICE2NTUE-TGD972NTUEE_BL5072Nurse2Olympics_ISG2Palmar_Drama2PCSH91_3052Road_Running2RSSH91_3022RSSH93_3052RSSH972SFFamily2SFHS2Singapore2soul2SP2_AllSport2SportLottery2SSSH-16th-Fk2Tainan2TFSHS69th3212TTU-IM2TTU-talk2TTU-Transfer2TTU-US992Viator94gi2WorldCup2YCSH_7_3132YiGo3112YMU_BME952Yoga_Lin2YOLO2A-Rod1AboutBoards1AC_In1Acad-Affairs1AfterPhD1AirForce1Anti-Cancer1AprilSky1asciiart1ASIA-uni1Atheism1Aviation1BabyMother1BDSM1Beauty1BigShiLin1Billiard1Birthday1BLEACH1Cancer1CareerPlan1CATCH1CCU_CSIE87u1CGSH86th3171CGSH86th3211CGU_EE981Chan_Mou1chatskill1chi1ck60th3131ck_17_3011cksh75th121cksh80th3071cksh84th3021CLHS-50-141clmusic1CMJH_93_3051CMU_chorus1CMWang1Comic1CPBL1CPU_FC7811CSMU-HSA951CSMU-MED951CSMU-PT971DaCin1digger1DummyHistory1Education1electronic1EthnosBase1FCU_SB_CLUB1FCU_Talk1feminine_sex1Feminism1FJU-MBA961FJU-STAT95B1friends1FSHS-89-3121FuMouDiscuss1Gindis1GO1Guolun1Hamster1HarukiMuraka1HatePolitics1HCHS593051HsiaYu1Hsinchu1HsinTien1HSNU_11351HSNU_9891HwangYih1ISU1JinYong1JohnnyDepp1JP_Entertain1Ju-881KevinGarnett1KingofPop1KMT1KOU1KS91-3191KS93-3041KS96-3021KS97-3021KS98-3021KUAS_5880321lesbian1Leslie1LinKou1literature1LordsOfWater1LUNA1M_Cannon_3231MacShop1MakeUp1Mancare1MCUBA891MdnCNhistory1Military1mknoheya1MLB1MUSE1NBAGM1NCCU07_TWHis1NCCU08_LawB1NCCU09_CHI1NCCU_TEA1NCHU-MEgradu1NCNUEM1NCUT1NCYU_AQUA_981NCYU_Fst_991NDHU-LS-SB1NetRumor1NHLUE_LED971NSYSUcsebbt1NTHU-DSPMT121NTHU_ENGI121NTNU-HISBK1NTOU-AQUA981NTPU-ACC961NTPU-ECONM961NTPU-STAT-BA1NTU1NTUA_GCA941NTUE-SPE1NTUEOE_R306A1NTUEtalk1NTUPoem1NTUSTfinM971NUTN_MS991NUU_Talk1Penny_11PHAT-MEN1PlayStation1poetry1pts1PU_Family1PublicServan1RayAllen1RIPE_gender1RO1Romances1RootsnShoots1SCU_LawBB1SeibuLions1SET1sky1SMAP1SongJerry1SSSH-09th1141STDM-86-3021STU1SuperBike1Surf1SW_Job1T-mac1Tech_Job1TFSHS61st3211THU-CHE961THU-CHEM941THU-HIS971TKU-CESB1TKU-eesb1TKU_CSSB1TKU_EE_92C1TKU_EWSB1TKU_HisSB1TKU_MESB1TKU_STAT_SB1TKUMB-SB1toberich1TTSH-12th3171TTU-AFL1TTU-I90B1TuTsau1TW-history1TW-language1TW_Entertain1TWSU1W-Philosophy1Wanhua1Warfare1Wrestle1WuLing46-3171WuLing50-3031YoungDotx31YP89-3041Yup00-031<< 收起看板(464)
6F推:同意leemt，直銷商藉口很多，原po小心10/10 22:17
1F推:風球詩雜誌 幼獅文藝10/09 21:27
4F推:推小王子10/05 23:00
1F推:09/29 12:12
12F推:推噬夢人09/27 19:54
1F→:這討論串還在繼續阿......(茶)09/18 01:26
183F→:XDDDDDDDDDDD09/13 18:32
20F推:法律部分我覺得有些道理耶......之前電影《不能沒有你》很09/11 17:55
22F→:夯的時候，就有人去訪問原故事的父親，也就是當事人。09/11 17:55
24F→:他說他為什麼抱孩子在天橋要跳，其中一個原因就是因為他很09/11 17:56
26F→:想為孩子做些什麼，可是六法全數又不是白話文他看不懂。09/11 17:56
27F→: 書09/11 17:56
28F→:對於沒錢打官司、教育程度又不高的民眾而言，法律似乎真的09/11 17:57
29F→:是離他們比較遙遠的......09/11 17:57
37F→:那又不一樣了，我說的是常識，T兄說的是思維模式......09/11 17:59
127F推:推薦這篇文章。09/11 17:24
135F→:樓上這會有兩個問題。一、藝術類的無法做到簡化。像文學就09/11 17:27
137F→:是語言的藝術。二、你怎麼知道你選的書，裡面說的是專業的09/11 17:28
139F→:、真的？09/11 17:28
143F→:可以試舉例哪些小說可以用這樣的簡化方式來吸收獲得嗎.....09/11 17:29
144F→:又，你吸收他的主線大綱的目的在得到什麼？09/11 17:30
147F→:另外，主線大綱的定義為何？如果他有埋藏支線的伏筆被撰寫09/11 17:30
149F→:者忽略了，那是不是就會造成讀者的誤解？09/11 17:30
152F→:可以提本為讓讀者獲得「知識」而做且可被簡化的作品嗎？09/11 17:31
153F→:F大，沒關係。09/11 17:31
156F→:不，我的意思是：大綱是誰在定義的？如果定義大綱的人閱讀09/11 17:32
157F→:時撰寫時不夠細心，那讀者就會承擔有誤會的風險了。09/11 17:32
159F→:大家定義的大綱是推薦書的人寫的，對吧？09/11 17:32
162F推:稍微看了一下上面的討論串，我也誠心建議您：不要懷抱目的09/11 17:35
164F→:去閱讀。試著享受且投入其中吧！09/11 17:35
165F→:當然實用性的書籍(EX經濟類......)除外09/11 17:36
176F推:你用意是好的，但......09/11 17:39
184F推:trausing大知道「內化」是什麼意思嗎？09/11 17:42
185F→:您的作法很可能會得到一堆大家當下可以聽懂的結論，但不能09/11 17:42
187F→:知道這些結論是怎麼被推導出來的。到真正要用的時候還是一09/11 17:43
190F→:樣用不出來。09/11 17:43
191F→:但你何以證明那100P的為真且沒有遺漏某些重要的東西呢？09/11 17:43
194F→:像哲學的東西可能就要經過某些推導，如果你只從結果去看，09/11 17:44
196F→:很難了解他的過程跟「為什麼會這樣」09/11 17:44
198F→:就像看NBA只看BOX，那你就失去比賽最精采的部分了。09/11 17:44
201F→:我會同意Jamei大的說法，如果一個人在某專業領域有大量閱讀09/11 17:46
202F→:的事實會比較快能理解。09/11 17:46
205F→:但即使如此，他所整理的重點也未必能在他人心中深刻化。09/11 17:47
208F→:舉一個例子好了：數字版09/11 17:48
209F→:數字版有時會有強者發專業文戰，當然有些人看了就會有所獲09/11 17:49
210F→:得。但是強者說的話有可能是為了回文而片面的回覆，並沒有09/11 17:49
211F→:講得很完整。結果看的人反而容易因刻板印象產生一些誤會和09/11 17:50
212F→:偏見。09/11 17:50
213F→:就是因為這樣的情形，我才覺得下結論、摘要都要謹慎，也就09/11 17:50
214F→:是因為這樣，才證明了術業有專攻這回事。09/11 17:50